Naglfar Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 My eyes have been opened. FE10 Ilyana for Top tier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikethfc Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Well she does have the best availablitity and if you use her she normally has the most kills because of all that babying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momo Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Well she does have the best availablitity and if you use her she normally has the most kills because of all that babying. why are you sandbagging her? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naglfar Posted August 3, 2010 Author Share Posted August 3, 2010 why are you sandbagging her? Yeah. She can get around her speed cap with Adept. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikethfc Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 why are you sandbagging her? I am? Thats just how I use her in part 3 feed her kills and give her blossom to help her double. So she normally gets the most kills by endgame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naglfar Posted August 3, 2010 Author Share Posted August 3, 2010 I am? Thats just how I use her in part 3 feed her kills and give her blossom to help her double. So she normally gets the most kills by endgame. Stop trying to be serious in a joke thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawman Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 (edited) FE10 Ilyana can't be top tier...she doesn't look cool enough as third tier Arch Sage. Edited August 3, 2010 by acey555 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowofchaos Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 FE10 Ilyana CAN be top tier...she eats enough as third tier Arch Sage. fixed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 My eyes have been opened. Aren't you SolNaglfar, the great troll of FE GFAQs boards? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted August 3, 2010 Share Posted August 3, 2010 Aren't you SolNaglfar, the great troll of FE GFAQs boards? Naglfar [Avatar] * * Not the one from GameFAQs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naglfar Posted August 4, 2010 Author Share Posted August 4, 2010 Naglfar [Avatar] * * Not the one from GameFAQs. Pretty much this. Wow, I haven't been mistaken for a GameFAQs troll once since I put up that member title until now. I had a feeling this thread would do it, though. :3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 Aren't you SolNaglfar, the great troll of FE GFAQs boards? You have a knack for missing the obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenrir Posted August 4, 2010 Share Posted August 4, 2010 Is she really in high/top on gFaqs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naglfar Posted August 6, 2010 Author Share Posted August 6, 2010 Is she really in high/top on gFaqs? I didn't see any tier list. To be honest, the general consensus is that she sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenrir Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 I didn't see any tier list. To be honest, the general consensus is that she sucks. pretty accurate consensus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted August 6, 2010 Share Posted August 6, 2010 I didn't see any tier list. To be honest, the general consensus is that she sucks. Don't you think that "general consensus" is somewhat redundant!?!?!?!?one?one? As a consensus is already a generalized agreement... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Don't you think that "general consensus" is somewhat redundant!?!?!?!?one?one? As a consensus is already a generalized agreement... Wouldn't "consensus" mean that everyone there agrees with the statement? To meet the definition of the word you need everyone to agree. Sticking "general" in front of the word would then indicate to me that maybe not everyone agrees, but very very many people agree on that conclusion. I don't think it is redundant in that case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fayt Zelpher Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Wouldn't "consensus" mean that everyone there agrees with the statement? To meet the definition of the word you need everyone to agree. Sticking "general" in front of the word would then indicate to me that maybe not everyone agrees, but very very many people agree on that conclusion. I don't think it is redundant in that case. I'm not much of an English person, but 'consensus' does imply (at least near) unanimity while 'general consensus' would suggest that there's at least a small group that disagrees, but it's accepted by both. So yeah, I agree with this statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReformBlade Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Either way, Ilyana has X fans too many, where X = # of fans she has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Sorry, you guys are right I just had a brain farttt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted August 7, 2010 Share Posted August 7, 2010 Sorry, you guys are right I just had a brain farttt. Other people agree that "general consensus" is redundant, though. http://languageandgrammar.com/2008/04/08/the-general-consensus-is/ Found that on Google when I was making my post and then decided that I didn't care what they said. Consensus, to me, means that everyone agrees. When a company makes decisions "by consensus", that doesn't mean that 6 or 7 of the 10 people on a board agreed to the proposal and the other 3 or 4 were out of luck. All 10 came to some sort of agreement on the subject. All. If I were to say (for some fictitious company) "The general consensus in the company is that the higher ups are morons" then that is clearly different from "The consensus...". Most likely, the "higher ups" would disagree rather strongly with the statement that they are morons, and they are part of the company. Hence, it is not a consensus. However, if nearly everyone else firmly believes that the higher ups are morons, then it can be called a "general consensus". To me, this would be far more significant than saying "The majority opinion in the companay..." or something similar because that could mean only 51% of the members believe the higher ups are morons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.