Mikethfc Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 (edited) Fucksticks Acey disappearing too would imply that there isn't that strict a limit on janitoring. Edited November 19, 2010 by mikethfc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeaponsofMassConstruction Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 1/2. Also, I got an innocent on Spike/DP. Vote: Balcerzak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ether Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 So then the most likely scenario is that you are an insane cop, my subordinate. Either that or mafia have a framer and a lawyer and massive prediction skills, since Spike's role PM did not imply that he scanned innocent, although it could have been extra information that we don't get... >_<. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 (edited) IGNORE THIS Stupid Psych.... I though Spike was Town. >_> ##Vote Bal Edited November 19, 2010 by Psych Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Vote: Balcerzak What makes you suspicious of Balcerzak anyway? Just curious, but I don't believe you provided much reason behind that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 What does a Lawyer do? Is it essentially a Framer? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ether Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 He got a guilty on a townie and a inno on Nicholas. Therefore, he is either insane(would explain both) or the mafia have both a lawyer and a framer, and both caught Weapons. Or Raymond was framed and Nicholas scans innocent anyway(like the generic Godfather, so not impossible), which is the third option. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 (edited) @RD: The opposite. It makes a mafia appear innocent. Can't use it on himself, though, so that's one good thing. Edited November 19, 2010 by Luka Megurine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ether Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 A lawyer makes Mafia's scan inno. Framer makes town scan guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 (edited) Ah, thanks. Yeah, I believe that WoMC is probably insane, since the Assassins being able to guess his target twice in a row is unlikely. Although he did say that he was probably going to investigate Balcerzak or Spike, so maybe it's not that unlikely after all. EDIT: Spelling error. Edited November 19, 2010 by Radiant Dragon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BK-201 Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 He got a guilty on a townie and a inno on Nicholas. Therefore, he is either insane(would explain both) or the mafia have both a lawyer and a framer, and both caught Weapons. Or Raymond was framed and Nicholas scans innocent anyway(like the generic Godfather, so not impossible), which is the third option. This doesn't explain why Bal is guilty. He has had two night actions, scan Raymond and scan Spike. Why jump on Bal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ether Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Weapons stated multiple times he was suspicious of Bal. I guess he is just acting on it, even though he wouldn't have scanned him yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 That's no reason to lynch Balcerzak though; look what happened to Raymond. Psych, why are you voting for Balcerzak? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeaponsofMassConstruction Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Balcerzak is playing in line with his scum meta. He's lurking a bunch, and his content posts this game, while they have a lot of text, in the end don't say much new. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Psych Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 In my mind Weapons was clear, as was Ether, through some circumstantial evidence I had encountered. In short: I've got nothing, but I trust Weapons enough to follow him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeaponsofMassConstruction Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Also, since Ether has to send me my orders, and I think I posted last night that I wanted to investigate Spike/DP, it would be very easy for scum to lawyer or frame my targets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radiant Dragon Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Balcerzak lurking doesn't automatically mean he's scum, past habits or no. Maybe he's just busy, and I don't feel comfortable lynching lurkers without any proof of their guilt this early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anouleth Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Why don't you just scan Balcerzak tonight if you're so suspicious of him? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 ... if anything, Balcerzak's MORE active as scum (see: Choral Mafia 1, where he had everyone fooled until he died because he contributed a lot). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikethfc Posted November 19, 2010 Share Posted November 19, 2010 Why don't you just scan Balcerzak tonight if you're so suspicious of him? Good idea WoMC can scan Bal tonight and we'll hope any potential mafia lawyers/framers don't see this post ^I'd say that's why not, given that WoMC's orders have to come from Ether. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balcerzak Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 I see Weapons is still pushing hard for me. Not unexpected at all. Weapon, may I remind you of Don't Lose Yo' Village here, where you also constantly pushed on me when I was Doctor, until Bizz culted you and told you to shut up? And do you remember in Insanity, when you inducted me into the fake cult? I'm not seeing any difference in how I'm playing this game compared to either of those games, and I was clean each time as well. Sure, maybe it looks like I'm 'lurking', but if my role gives me no information (pro-tip, it doesn't), and I was out of town for an extended period (pro-tip, I was) then odds are good that when I get back, anything I could contribute would just be retreading ground that's already been covered. If you want to talk about people who are really lurking, like hard-core style, I believe we have yet to hear from Jean-Marc, so don't mind if I put some pressure on him, see what he has to say for himself. ##Vote Jean-Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 Now that you bring up the topic of Jean-Marc... 520 Replies. JeanMarc has made zero of these. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaybee Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 Wait... Ether, what military roles are known to you? (e.g. Corporal, Private, etc.)? Also, do you get to control ALL the night actions of these people? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ether Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 I only know of myself and Weapons. And the only roles I know of affecting are myself ans Weapons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliriyum Posted November 20, 2010 Share Posted November 20, 2010 Balcerzak pushing on an inactive person makes him more suspicious IMO. He didn't establish any legitimate suspicions on active people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.