Thor Odinson Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Peppy's shouldn't count either since booooooo is not a reason. Peppy, if you're reading this, next time you rate a unit you don't like, give at least some valid reason instead of just sticking some text there. Anyway I'll be counting since gotta keep it consistent with the spreadsheets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Refa Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 How does a 7.5 equate to decent filler? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 (edited) Yeah, I gotta agree to that. 7.5 does seem a bit high for decent filler. But at least there's justifying text and shit unlike some other votes. Eh, it's not like Karel's final score's much high anyway, which I got as a 4.04 not counting in the two that didn't even try giving proper reasoning. I'll leave the GDocs open a little longer if 13th or anyone else wishes to change his vote as I set up Harken's thread, but I'm not too fussed about this one. Edited January 25, 2012 by Luminescent Blade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Yeah, I gotta agree to that. 7.5 does seem a bit high for decent filler. But at least there's justifying text and shit unlike some other votes. Eh, it's not like Karel's final score's much high anyway, which I got as a 4.04 not counting in the two that didn't even try giving proper reasoning. Shiitake. That was supposed to be a 6.5. I REALLY hate the lack of numpad on this keyboard. Sorry bout that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Oh, well, that's cool then. Yeah. That puts Karel at a 4.01. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geriba Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Then fine. Rate The Unit under conventional play through options. Conventional as in, how you can play the game "out if the box, without hacks". Or better yet, conventional as in how Serene's Forest declares a unit, see http://www.serenesforest.net/fe7 for details...yea. Is that specific enough? I started this thing assuming people would rate units on their well known, standard facts, not arbitrary stats generated in hacks. This doesn't preclude the swordmaster-only run hypothetical. Would that still be an acceptable standard? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anouleth Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Karel was really useful in my Karel-only playthrough, 10/10! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsalmon Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Louise had 28... And has an Auto A that gives her +3 Defense, and ranged attacks. Karel has like, no realistic supports and Sword-lock. :/ Rating now, not counting Swordsalmon's 0 because he didn't justify it. Wow, that's not nice. :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted January 25, 2012 Share Posted January 25, 2012 Then why didn't you say that? If you typed out actual reasons instead of "31HP :/", then it would have counted. I've threatened to discount ratings of good ratings of units I like until the rater has provided me with something reasonable. Should've said something more like "31HP with supports too slow to make up for the defensive problems and swordlock means the shittiest range options ever and WTD, terrible, 0/10" that would've been acceptable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anouleth Posted January 26, 2012 Share Posted January 26, 2012 And has an Auto A that gives her +3 Defense, and ranged attacks. Karel has like, no realistic supports and Sword-lock. :/ Even with her support, Louise has less defense than Karel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.