deleted35362 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaMonkey Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 I didn't think that any other words apart from "no" were required in my answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inui Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 sf mods r gay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted35362 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 sf mods r gay sorry, inui. i already tried recruiting them to gay thread and it didn't work :L Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Icon of Sin Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 some sigs may be long, but has anyone noticed the length of some people's locations i'm looking at one with twelve lines Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 sf mods r gay i should ban you for sedition Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ϲharlie Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 I remember one time when I reported an obnoxious animated sig that was like five times the specified file size, and nothing was done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deleted35362 Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 anyone can ignore specific sigs whenever they want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peener weener Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 (edited) I remember one time when I reported an obnoxious animated sig that was like five times the specified file size, and nothing was done.Was it mineI was told to change it Edited January 29, 2014 by Stolypin Necktie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ϲharlie Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 No, it was someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Laufeyson Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I think SF is too lenient with the Size of signatures personally but maybe that's just me AND HOW! At my other forum, sigs cannot really exceed like 200x600 pixels. Plus, theres an automatic cut off where the forum software will cut your sig off it its too many lines. We cannot even use the spoiler tag trick there cuz yeah. Plus it cant be hella big in animated gif form. I think the cut off is about 1mb at most. Not sure actually. To be honest, i wasnt even aware some of my larger, animated sigs were breaking any rules. Not until Bal pointed it out. Hurrr. No, it was someone else. It may be the same person im thinking of, who had a gajillion different animated images stacked in their sig for hella days with a terrible fucking layout. Ugh...ugh! As far as content goes, yeah this forum is the most lenient in terms of what can be actually in your sig/avatar, at least the forums i visit. My other forum, you cant have bad words in your sigs/avatars. You cant also have anything really NSFW. Scantily clad, or suggestive, maybe depending on the actual content. Its sort of a case-by-case issue though. Hard to explain. Like Esme's current sig wouldnt be allowed at that forum cuz "Mmm, dick." Even if we do agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momentai~ Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 AND HOW! At my other forum, sigs cannot really exceed like 200x600 pixels. Plus, theres an automatic cut off where the forum software will cut your sig off it its too many lines. We cannot even use the spoiler tag trick there cuz yeah. Plus it cant be hella big in animated gif form. I think the cut off is about 1mb at most. Not sure actually. To be honest, i wasnt even aware some of my larger, animated sigs were breaking any rules. Not until Bal pointed it out. Hurrr. SF has rejected some of my images and gifs for being too large so I came to the conclusion that if it were allowed it was an acceptable size but I've been told to spoiler stuff once or twice so I guess that's not always the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Laufeyson Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Well the spoiler tag thing really does help. I do like how that option is available if we want to get a little nutty with our sigs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 sf mods r gay Oh, speaking of! It's past Christmas, so why are those ladies still in holiday wear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Laufeyson Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Oh, speaking of! It's past Christmas, so why are those ladies still in holiday wear? You make me smile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Refa Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Oh, speaking of! It's past Christmas, so why are those ladies still in holiday wear? Probably for the same reason as Shin's avatar; I guess living under a rock does have its benefits... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shin Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Probably for the same reason as Shin's avatar; I guess living under a rock does have its benefits... But it wasn't a rock, it was a... Boulder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 No. I haven't seen anything NSFW in all of my time here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 AND HOW! At my other forum, sigs cannot really exceed like 200x600 pixels. Plus, theres an automatic cut off where the forum software will cut your sig off it its too many lines. We cannot even use the spoiler tag trick there cuz yeah. Plus it cant be hella big in animated gif form. I think the cut off is about 1mb at most. Not sure actually. To be honest, i wasnt even aware some of my larger, animated sigs were breaking any rules. Not until Bal pointed it out. Hurrr. Actually... Spoilers stop content from being loaded before being opened, so they solve most all problems. The line limit is still an issue, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euklyd Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 No. I haven't seen anything NSFW in all of my time here. This is true. However, I'd say that I've seen things I would rather my parents, say, not see, or random people walking behind me at college. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euklyd Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Actually... Spoilers stop content from being loaded before being opened, so they solve most all problems. The line limit is still an issue, though. Pretty sure this is incorrect. I've seen threads with tons of images, all spoilered, that have taken a long time to load. Also clicking the "show spoiler" before it's finished loading won't open it; you have to click it again. Or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I don't think it's fair to use that kind of standard because it is too limiting. If you are concerned about that, you may want to find a way to hide the page when people come looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 (edited) Pretty sure this is incorrect. I've seen threads with tons of images, all spoilered, that have taken a long time to load. Also clicking the "show spoiler" before it's finished loading won't open it; you have to click it again. Or something. While that's interesting, I would need to test it... The dispay: none property in CSS stops something from being loaded by the DOM. Maybe the spoiler content isn't being hidden until after it loads? That would be a problem. Edited January 29, 2014 by Makaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euklyd Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I don't think it's fair to use that kind of standard because it is too limiting. If you are concerned about that, you may want to find a way to hide the page when people come looking. That's why I hide sigs. I guess I'm not even using that as a standard; I did say I don't think it's too lenient earlier. I guess it's more a partial explanation for why I hide sigs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 (edited) Tested it. It seems only the container is hidden, defeating the purpose. Whoever coded this needs a new job. Actually... display: none doesn't stop it from being loaded. I've been lied to all this time. Curses! There is a way to stop them from being loaded and that is to use JavaScript (jQuery in this case) to dynamically remove the images from the DOM until the spoiler is clicked, and then add them. Edited January 29, 2014 by Makaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.