Jump to content

Hello, Hi, Hey: I'm $$$ richh


Recommended Posts

Spoiler

istg hashiyan alone raps circles around like 95 or even 99 percent of idol rappers and im not even supposed to like japanese rap

 

Edited by Painkiller B
stan hitori
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 493.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Starman

    60032

  • Kinumi

    38629

  • Lance Masayoshi

    26279

  • Soledai

    25884

Spoiler

nothing makes me happier than discovering an old utaite who hasn't retired and realizing that i like them bc theyre from the first generation and have probably covered lots of classics and more importantly songs i am familiar w......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spoiler

my dad just came over and said "kim let me ask u something" and whenever he says that it's bad so i burst into tears before he even said anything and he was like wat the fuk i just wanted help w grammar, anyway on a completely unrelated note i learned about classical conditioning in psych today and now i feel omnipotent

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been itching to dabble in another story idea I've had, but for this one I need to find out some info about first. Something FE related, in fact, but unfortunately it seems that there doesn't seem to be any info about continent sizes. Unless I'm somehow missing something... not even here there seems to be info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Painkiller B said:

how and why

painkiller bzz

uni is sea urchin in japanese idk i can never look at him the same way again

51 minutes ago, Painkiller B said:
  Hide contents

my dad just came over and said "kim let me ask u something" and whenever he says that it's bad so i burst into tears before he even said anything and he was like wat the fuk i just wanted help w grammar, anyway on a completely unrelated note i learned about classical conditioning in psych today and now i feel omnipotent

 

teach me o omnipotent one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Painkiller B said:
  Hide contents

i thought i didn't like rap music but apparently i just don't like idol rappers

 

if u dont like rm we gonna fight

1 hour ago, Painkiller B said:
  Hide contents

my dad just came over and said "kim let me ask u something" and whenever he says that it's bad so i burst into tears before he even said anything and he was like wat the fuk i just wanted help w grammar, anyway on a completely unrelated note i learned about classical conditioning in psych today and now i feel omnipotent

 

lmao wat was the problem wat did u teach him...

wat's classical conditioning

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sylveonzoroark said:

uni is sea urchin in japanese idk i can never look at him the same way again

teach me o omnipotent one

that's hilarious and kinda cute tbh

idk if that is a serious question but im gonna talk about it anyway bc its gonna help me review and also psychology is interesting

1 hour ago, PKLucas531 said:

if u dont like rm we gonna fight

lmao wat was the problem wat did u teach him...

wat's classical conditioning

rm and one other idol rapper r debatable but like u kno

uhh he wanted to know the word for (something) and it was "integrity" so nothin mean...but the way he approached me was rly threatening much like dads

wow i sure am glad u and maybe sylv asked

Spoiler

so u kno ivan pavlov right?? he was this russian guy who made a bunch of significant contributions to wat we know about the digestive system today and he won a nobel prize for it which was pretty rad. but more importantly was that during his experiment w dogs and food he noticed that the dogs, without fail, would salivate whenever they saw the food. at first he was like "this is so fuckin annoying" but then he hmm'd and did a thing:

every time he showed the food to the dog he would sound a bell and eventually the dog began to associate the bell sound with the food and salivate just at the bell. this is a specific example but it can be applied to other things in like

 

[ before conditioning ]

sight of food (unconditioned stimulus) -> salivation (unconditioned response)

they are unconditioned because it is natural and does not have to be learned, e.g. you shiver when it is cold or you scratch an itch when you feel one. also, the bell sound (neutral stimulus) would produce no reaction from the dog during this stage

[ during conditioning ]

sight of food (ucs) + bell (ns) -> salivation (ucr)

this is the acquisition stage during which the dog learns to associate the bell w the food, and eventually

[ after conditioning ]

bell sound (conditioned stimulus) -> salivation (conditioned response)

the dog will react even without the original unconditioned stimulus

 

if the cs is continuously introduced without the ucs, though, the cr will gradually disappear (e.g. repeatedly ringing the bell without showing food will eventually make the dog stop salivating at the sound). it's called "extinction" when the cs and cs lose association in the subject's mind altogether but for some reason it can make a spontaneous recovery and come back some time later, which leads psychologists to believe that extinction suppresses the link rather than eliminating it. funnily enough there's also a thing called higher-order conditioning in which someone could hypothetically introduce a second neutral stimulus into the equation and ALSO make it a conditioned stimulus by associating it with the first neutral stimulus, although it will produce a weaker response. for example

tickle (ns) -> no salivation

bell sound (cs) + tickle (ns) -> salivation

tickle (new cs) -> somewhat less salivation

 

there's also something called generalization which basically means that the subject will produce a similar reaction if presented with things similar to the conditioned stimulus. for example, if u've heard of little baby albert, he was conditioned to fear his white furry rat but after that cried and screamed at anything furry, like rabbits and dogs he was visibly unaffected by prior to the conditioning. babies learn to fear the sound of motorcycles and other motorized vehicles from the sound of a car engine, et cetera

anyway if u classically condition someone to associate Good Things w u (maybe u give them chocolate every time u meet) u can make them like u more. that's a tame example but i think u could potentially take classical conditioning pretty far

 

Edited by Painkiller B
stan hitori
Link to comment
Share on other sites

tomorrow i am gonna read about operant conditioning and i'm already rly excited

 

 

Spoiler

me: i have done my psych homework three weeks in advance!!

kim: nice! now what about your math homework due tomorrow

me:

kim:

kim: dude—

me: i am gonna work on my fourth week of psychology homework

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2017 at 2:20 AM, Infinite Dreams said:

I'll try!  I'm not gifted with words, though... And I'll be as vague as possible to avoid spoilers.  :P:

I'm not sure if you've seen season 1 yet or not, but if not: The show is really neat because it's so... Strange?  Yeah.  Lots of weird, spooky stuff going on in this small town.  (Note: The show isn't too scary to watch alone.  I'm a big chicken and I was fine with it.)  It's set in the 80s.  Every episode made me hungry for more, more, more.  It's really good at building up suspense, and it's hard to stop watching.  

Season 2 feels "bigger" because it builds on a lot of stuff we saw in season 1, and there are all these different different stories going on at once.  

(The episode in particular that I didn't like just had a completely different feel from the rest of the show.  It headed in a direction that I wasn't fond of, and I was like, uhh, am I still watching Stranger Things right now?  Luckily, it was just the one episode.)

Personally, I'd rate season 2 just as good as season 1.  Such an awesome show.  ;):

i haven't really, all i know is most people i know really like it

season 2 is more of like....an expansion?
that sounds real nice
i love when the next season is more a bigger version of the first

On 10/31/2017 at 4:06 PM, Claudius I said:

melkor is pretty much just a child throwing a temper tantrum

except that he's the most powerful being in the universe

ea sounds depressing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Painkiller B said:

that's hilarious and kinda cute tbh

idk if that is a serious question but im gonna talk about it anyway bc its gonna help me review and also psychology is interesting

rm and one other idol rapper r debatable but like u kno

uhh he wanted to know the word for (something) and it was "integrity" so nothin mean...but the way he approached me was rly threatening much like dads

wow i sure am glad u and maybe sylv asked

  Hide contents

so u kno ivan pavlov right?? he was this russian guy who made a bunch of significant contributions to wat we know about the digestive system today and he won a nobel prize for it which was pretty rad. but more importantly was that during his experiment w dogs and food he noticed that the dogs, without fail, would salivate whenever they saw the food. at first he was like "this is so fuckin annoying" but then he hmm'd and did a thing:

every time he showed the food to the dog he would sound a bell and eventually the dog began to associate the bell sound with the food and salivate just at the bell. this is a specific example but it can be applied to other things in like

 

[ before conditioning ]

sight of food (unconditioned stimulus) -> salivation (unconditioned response)

they are unconditioned because it is natural and does not have to be learned, e.g. you shiver when it is cold or you scratch an itch when you feel one. also, the bell sound (neutral stimulus) would produce no reaction from the dog during this stage

[ during conditioning ]

sight of food (ucs) + bell (ns) -> salivation (ucr)

this is the acquisition stage during which the dog learns to associate the bell w the food, and eventually

[ after conditioning ]

bell sound (conditioned stimulus) -> salivation (conditioned response)

the dog will react even without the original unconditioned stimulus

 

if the cs is continuously introduced without the ucs, though, the cr will gradually disappear (e.g. repeatedly ringing the bell without showing food will eventually make the dog stop salivating at the sound). it's called "extinction" when the cs and cs lose association in the subject's mind altogether but for some reason it can make a spontaneous recovery and come back some time later, which leads psychologists to believe that extinction suppresses the link rather than eliminating it. funnily enough there's also a thing called higher-order conditioning in which someone could hypothetically introduce a second neutral stimulus into the equation and ALSO make it a conditioned stimulus by associating it with the first neutral stimulus, although it will produce a weaker response. for example

tickle (ns) -> no salivation

bell sound (cs) + tickle (ns) -> salivation

tickle (new cs) -> somewhat less salivation

 

there's also something called generalization which basically means that the subject will produce a similar reaction if presented with things similar to the conditioned stimulus. for example, if u've heard of little baby albert, he was conditioned to fear his white furry rat but after that cried and screamed at anything furry, like rabbits and dogs he was visibly unaffected by prior to the conditioning. babies learn to fear the sound of motorcycles and other motorized vehicles from the sound of a car engine, et cetera

anyway if u classically condition someone to associate Good Things w u (maybe u give them chocolate every time u meet) u can make them like u more. that's a tame example but i think u could potentially take classical conditioning pretty far

 

oh yes i remember this experiment. man psychology is so interesting i love it

33 minutes ago, Painkiller B said:

tomorrow i am gonna read about operant conditioning and i'm already rly excited

 

  Hide contents

me: i have done my psych homework three weeks in advance!!

kim: nice! now what about your math homework due tomorrow

me:

kim:

kim: dude—

me: i am gonna work on my fourth week of psychology homework

 

tell us about that too i'm already excited too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Painkiller B said:

that's hilarious and kinda cute tbh

idk if that is a serious question but im gonna talk about it anyway bc its gonna help me review and also psychology is interesting

rm and one other idol rapper r debatable but like u kno

uhh he wanted to know the word for (something) and it was "integrity" so nothin mean...but the way he approached me was rly threatening much like dads

wow i sure am glad u and maybe sylv asked

  Hide contents

so u kno ivan pavlov right?? he was this russian guy who made a bunch of significant contributions to wat we know about the digestive system today and he won a nobel prize for it which was pretty rad. but more importantly was that during his experiment w dogs and food he noticed that the dogs, without fail, would salivate whenever they saw the food. at first he was like "this is so fuckin annoying" but then he hmm'd and did a thing:

every time he showed the food to the dog he would sound a bell and eventually the dog began to associate the bell sound with the food and salivate just at the bell. this is a specific example but it can be applied to other things in like

 

[ before conditioning ]

sight of food (unconditioned stimulus) -> salivation (unconditioned response)

they are unconditioned because it is natural and does not have to be learned, e.g. you shiver when it is cold or you scratch an itch when you feel one. also, the bell sound (neutral stimulus) would produce no reaction from the dog during this stage

[ during conditioning ]

sight of food (ucs) + bell (ns) -> salivation (ucr)

this is the acquisition stage during which the dog learns to associate the bell w the food, and eventually

[ after conditioning ]

bell sound (conditioned stimulus) -> salivation (conditioned response)

the dog will react even without the original unconditioned stimulus

 

if the cs is continuously introduced without the ucs, though, the cr will gradually disappear (e.g. repeatedly ringing the bell without showing food will eventually make the dog stop salivating at the sound). it's called "extinction" when the cs and cs lose association in the subject's mind altogether but for some reason it can make a spontaneous recovery and come back some time later, which leads psychologists to believe that extinction suppresses the link rather than eliminating it. funnily enough there's also a thing called higher-order conditioning in which someone could hypothetically introduce a second neutral stimulus into the equation and ALSO make it a conditioned stimulus by associating it with the first neutral stimulus, although it will produce a weaker response. for example

tickle (ns) -> no salivation

bell sound (cs) + tickle (ns) -> salivation

tickle (new cs) -> somewhat less salivation

 

there's also something called generalization which basically means that the subject will produce a similar reaction if presented with things similar to the conditioned stimulus. for example, if u've heard of little baby albert, he was conditioned to fear his white furry rat but after that cried and screamed at anything furry, like rabbits and dogs he was visibly unaffected by prior to the conditioning. babies learn to fear the sound of motorcycles and other motorized vehicles from the sound of a car engine, et cetera

anyway if u classically condition someone to associate Good Things w u (maybe u give them chocolate every time u meet) u can make them like u more. that's a tame example but i think u could potentially take classical conditioning pretty far

 

dude yeah i've read about kinds of conditioning which is y i asked

i read about this really drastic case where this guy would always like, squeeze his wife/gf's (idr) thigh whenever they made out and said "i love you" for like forever and then he could just stare her in the face and squeeze her thigh and she'd say "i love you" like almost as if commanded it was wild

and then he speculated that like... if you did something similar during sex enough times he wondered if u could get an orgasm "on demand" like that psychologists are wild

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Painkiller B said:

wow, euklyd?? sleeping???? incomprehensible

as in u ARE #8 or would date #8 bc tbh knowing u it'd be both

im actually rly sleepy rn (probably bc i've gotten like 2-5 hours of sleep every night for the past week)

definitely both

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, sylveonzoroark said:

oh yes i remember this experiment. man psychology is so interesting i love it

tell us about that too i'm already excited too

do u mean pavlov's experiment or the little albert one??? if u mean the latter yea i watched it in class and cried bc it was so sad : ( he was so afraid of the furry animals and the psychologists kept shoving them on him and he could barely crawl away because he was so small it made me sad

yes i will, thx for helpin me review

9 hours ago, PKLucas531 said:

dude yeah i've read about kinds of conditioning which is y i asked

i read about this really drastic case where this guy would always like, squeeze his wife/gf's (idr) thigh whenever they made out and said "i love you" for like forever and then he could just stare her in the face and squeeze her thigh and she'd say "i love you" like almost as if commanded it was wild

and then he speculated that like... if you did something similar during sex enough times he wondered if u could get an orgasm "on demand" like that psychologists are wild

ya psychology is always interesting but this is one of the more "whoa!!" things i think!!!

thats wild lmao, i think i actually have read about a guy who kissed his wife's ear or neck or sth right after every time they had sex and i forgot what resulted from that but yes conditioning is crazy......i feel powerful

9 hours ago, Euklyd said:

im actually rly sleepy rn (probably bc i've gotten like 2-5 hours of sleep every night for the past week)

definitely both

wow r u ok, do u need someone to mom u

is it at least for something productive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Red Velvet really deserve all this hype and attention?

Spoiler

WaRlzwS.gif

QksHCbH.gif

xdwZLgu.gif

oYmkCHu.gif

iqOvN7B.gif

KePoGc5.gif

GfZq3eu.gif

y1fS3Ki.gif

hd3nylI.gif

THE ANSWER IS YES BECAUSE THEY'RE QUEENS OF CONCEPTS, VERSATILITY, AND TAKING RISKS BUT RELEASING QUALITY ONLY.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Painkiller B said:

wow r u ok, do u need someone to mom u

is it at least for something productive

no i'd just ignore them too

kind of?? the intent was generally good but i didn't necessarily make a lot of progress from it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Euklyd said:

no i'd just ignore them too

kind of?? the intent was generally good but i didn't necessarily make a lot of progress from it

darn, well as ur friend i am gonna remind u to actually be ok anyway

 

Spoiler

d85c21ce2f.png

u irl

 

50 minutes ago, PKLucas531 said:

tom and jerry 

I want to watch the vid but my internet is down atm....

heh nice

: (....shame...........it's rly good and dumb, much like seventeen and especially hoshi and dk

 

29 minutes ago, sylveonzoroark said:

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

ahahaha oh god what the fuck is this help this is the best thing i've seen all year oh my god

 

i still haven't seen move tbh, my friend showed me the lyrics and i was afraid

 

 

 

 

also taemin vaguely looks like wonho from stuck era in the thumbnail and it's scary woops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Painkiller B said:

damian watch this important video of hoshi and dk hyping up carats for the sebtin keombaek

"carats are you ready, seventeen is coming"

Spoiler

watchin this w a different song in the bg is rly good bc they're just kinda movin to the beat w/o any face it's fun

 

Edited by Painkiller B
stan hitori
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...