ZemZem Posted April 14, 2014 Share Posted April 14, 2014 Not a math joke, but: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lance Masayoshi Posted April 14, 2014 Share Posted April 14, 2014 Not a math joke, but: lol Also Imaginary Numbers are real Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted April 14, 2014 Share Posted April 14, 2014 Logic is close enough, right? A man's wife tells him to go to the store to buy a loaf of bread. She adds, "If they have eggs, buy a dozen." The man comes home with twelve loaves of bread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttmuncher.ops Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ansem Posted April 15, 2014 Author Share Posted April 15, 2014 too easy 3/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomX2 Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 http://www.buzzfeed.com/babymantis/20-spectacularly-nerdy-math-jokes-1opu my favorite is "shit just got real" LOL, number 10 is actually pretty usable. @Makaze: Nice, I love logic jokes. I was gonna post the old "3 logicians walk into a bar" one, but since everyone knows that I'll just leave this here. It's a difficult riddle instead of a joke, and I couldn't solve it alone, but it's damn satisfying when you get the answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ansem Posted April 15, 2014 Author Share Posted April 15, 2014 ^10/10 would definitely use in real life. I looked up the solution thinking I had gotten it right, but like the puzzle said, its not simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NTG Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 (edited) Help I can't distinguish my cup* from my donut** *or mug **or doughnut Edited April 15, 2014 by NTG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted April 15, 2014 Share Posted April 15, 2014 @Makaze: Nice, I love logic jokes. I was gonna post the old "3 logicians walk into a bar" one, but since everyone knows that I'll just leave this here. It's a difficult riddle instead of a joke, and I couldn't solve it alone, but it's damn satisfying when you get the answer.I think I figured out the answer, but how do I actually check if it's correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ansem Posted April 15, 2014 Author Share Posted April 15, 2014 Google Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 GoogleBut that would spoil the correct answer if I'm wrong... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleph Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I just spoiled myself and as it turns out it involves induction, which I would not have guessed any time soon. Then again my brain is already fried trying to write a function in C that returns true if and only if a supplied line segment intersects with a given cylinder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fruity Insanity Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I hardly get anything in this thread. My math level isn't high enough, apparently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomX2 Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Since there's three of us with the answer now, you can always post your guess (if you haven't googled it yet) and we'll tell you if you're right. @Fruity Insanity: Do you even grind bro? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acacia Sgt Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 (edited) I like this thread. The Pascal one has to be my most favorite so far. lol Speaking of that riddle... hahaha, it's funny how once finding the answer it all becomes easy to understand... then again, it did said it was simply a use of logic. Not that the logic itself is simple, but you know what I mean... Edited April 16, 2014 by Acacia Sgt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MRDRHAWK Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I was gonna make one up but then I realized it was just gonna be a shitty tangent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kriemhild Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Alright, here's my guess at the blue eyes riddle: [spoiler=Blue Eyes Guess]All of the people with blue eyes leave the island together, at the 100th night. Explanation: A blue-eyed person, B1, will see 99 people with blue eyes. To him, there are two possibilities: there are 99 blue-eyed people, or 100 blue-eyed people. B1 deduces that IF there are 99 blue-eyed people, then each of those blue-eyed people (e.g. B2) would deduce two possibilities: there are 98 blue-eyed people, or 99 blue-eyed people. B1 knows that in this b=99 hypothetical scenario, B2 would deduce that IF there are 98 blue-eyed people, then each of those 98 blue-eyed people (e.g. B3, but this set also includes B1) would deduce two possibilities: there are 97 blue-eyed people, or 98 blue-eyed people. The chain goes on. B99 deduces that there are either 2 blue-eyed people or one. IF there's only one, then B100 would deduce that there is either 1 person with blue eyes, or nobody. Before the Guru spoke, both possibilities would work and nobody leaves the island due to uncertainty. But after the Guru spoke, B100 would know that the latter is impossible. Therefore, B100 would know that he actually has blue eyes and will leave the island on the first night. But after the first night, B100 doesn't leave (b is not truly equal to 1), so B99 would now know that the b = 1 is impossible. Therefore, there are only two people with blue eyes and both will leave the island on the second night. This doesn't happen, so B98 knows that b cannot be equal to 2, and so, all three people with blue eyes will leave the island on the third night. The chain continues until we go back to B1. On the 99th night, nobody left the island. So B1 knows that b is not equal to 99. B1 will now correctly deduce that b is equal to 100. All blue-eyed people will arrive at the same conclusion. They will all deduce that they have blue eyes and will leave on the 100th night. I probably couldn't explain that well, but if anybody else arrived at the same solution, they might understand what I mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acacia Sgt Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Alright, here's my guess at the blue eyes riddle: [spoiler=Blue Eyes Guess]All of the people with blue eyes leave the island together, at the 100th night. Explanation: A blue-eyed person, B1, will see 99 people with blue eyes. To him, there are two possibilities: there are 99 blue-eyed people, or 100 blue-eyed people. B1 deduces that IF there are 99 blue-eyed people, then each of those blue-eyed people (e.g. B2) would deduce two possibilities: there are 98 blue-eyed people, or 99 blue-eyed people. B1 knows that in this b=99 hypothetical scenario, B2 would deduce that IF there are 98 blue-eyed people, then each of those 98 blue-eyed people (e.g. B3, but this set also includes B1) would deduce two possibilities: there are 97 blue-eyed people, or 98 blue-eyed people. The chain goes on. B99 deduces that there are either 2 blue-eyed people or one. IF there's only one, then B100 would deduce that there is either 1 person with blue eyes, or nobody. Before the Guru spoke, both possibilities would work and nobody leaves the island due to uncertainty. But after the Guru spoke, B100 would know that the latter is impossible. Therefore, B100 would know that he actually has blue eyes and will leave the island on the first night. But after the first night, B100 doesn't leave (b is not truly equal to 1), so B99 would now know that the b = 1 is impossible. Therefore, there are only two people with blue eyes and both will leave the island on the second night. This doesn't happen, so B98 knows that b cannot be equal to 2, and so, all three people with blue eyes will leave the island on the third night. The chain continues until we go back to B1. On the 99th night, nobody left the island. So B1 knows that b is not equal to 99. B1 will now correctly deduce that b is equal to 100. All blue-eyed people will arrive at the same conclusion. They will all deduce that they have blue eyes and will leave on the 100th night. I probably couldn't explain that well, but if anybody else arrived at the same solution, they might understand what I mean. That's pretty much it. It's basically everybody doing an elimination process of everybody else also eliminating who else is eliminating who has already realized there is more blue-eyed than what they see (if this doesn't make sense then I just don't know how to word it properly). It all boils down to "Group of size X leave on the Xth night." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ansem Posted April 16, 2014 Author Share Posted April 16, 2014 Topic title to nerd trivia y/y Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 (edited) Alright, here's my guess at the blue eyes riddle: [spoiler=Blue Eyes Guess]All of the people with blue eyes leave the island together, at the 100th night. Explanation: A blue-eyed person, B1, will see 99 people with blue eyes. To him, there are two possibilities: there are 99 blue-eyed people, or 100 blue-eyed people. B1 deduces that IF there are 99 blue-eyed people, then each of those blue-eyed people (e.g. B2) would deduce two possibilities: there are 98 blue-eyed people, or 99 blue-eyed people. B1 knows that in this b=99 hypothetical scenario, B2 would deduce that IF there are 98 blue-eyed people, then each of those 98 blue-eyed people (e.g. B3, but this set also includes B1) would deduce two possibilities: there are 97 blue-eyed people, or 98 blue-eyed people. The chain goes on. B99 deduces that there are either 2 blue-eyed people or one. IF there's only one, then B100 would deduce that there is either 1 person with blue eyes, or nobody. Before the Guru spoke, both possibilities would work and nobody leaves the island due to uncertainty. But after the Guru spoke, B100 would know that the latter is impossible. Therefore, B100 would know that he actually has blue eyes and will leave the island on the first night. But after the first night, B100 doesn't leave (b is not truly equal to 1), so B99 would now know that the b = 1 is impossible. Therefore, there are only two people with blue eyes and both will leave the island on the second night. This doesn't happen, so B98 knows that b cannot be equal to 2, and so, all three people with blue eyes will leave the island on the third night. The chain continues until we go back to B1. On the 99th night, nobody left the island. So B1 knows that b is not equal to 99. B1 will now correctly deduce that b is equal to 100. All blue-eyed people will arrive at the same conclusion. They will all deduce that they have blue eyes and will leave on the 100th night. I probably couldn't explain that well, but if anybody else arrived at the same solution, they might understand what I mean. Why doesn't the same logic apply to any other eye colors? It seems to me that B100 could also be a brown eyed person making the same deduction. A brown eyed person would see 100 blue eyed people, but likewise, they would not know that there are not 101 blue eyed people. Why do only the blue eyed people leave the island? Edited April 17, 2014 by Makaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acacia Sgt Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 (edited) Why doesn't the same logic apply to any other eye colors? It seems to me that B100 could also be a brown eyed person making the same deduction. A brown eyed person would see 100 blue eyed people, but likewise, they would not know that there are not 101 blue eyed people. Why do only the blue eyed people leave the island? Because of the same blue-eyed people. They know the blue eyed people can tell who has or not non blue eyes except for themselves, so once each know they have blue eyes and leave, the others conclude that by leaving, then they each know that, at the very least, they don't have blue eyes. Basically, the same logical process the blue-eyed use to see if they have blue eyes or not. Edited April 17, 2014 by Acacia Sgt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Because of the same blue-eyed people. They know the blue eyed people can tell who has or not non blue eyes except for themselves, so once each know they have blue eyes and leave, the others conclude that by leaving, then they each know that, at the very least, they don't have blue eyes. Basically, the same logical process the blue-eyed use to see if they have blue eyes or not. What keeps them from making the exact same decuction as the blue eyed people? According to the logic here, all of the people, regardless of eye color, would conclude that they had blue eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acacia Sgt Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 (edited) What keeps them from making the exact same decuction as the blue eyed people? According to the logic here, all of the people, regardless of eye color, would conclude that they had blue eyes. Because the blue eyed people reach the conclusion first, and leave. For example, let's say only 1 person had blue eyes. Everybody but him would think that there is either 1 (the blue eyed person they see) or 2 (the blue eyed person and themselves) blue eyed people. The blue eyed, seeing none, would think there is either none or 1 (himself). Since he knows the Guru saw a blue eyed person, then he, who sees none, concludes he is the one, and so leaves. After this everybody concludes that if the single blue eyed person left, then it's because he didn't saw anybody with blue eyes, and so concluded that he must be the only one if the Guru saw someone with Blue eyes. Since he left, then they conclude that they don't have blue eyes. This process is applied with more complexity as the number of blue eyed people increase, but the conclusion is the same. Once the blue eyed people realize they have them and leave, the rest can conclude that they don't have blue eyes, since otherwise the blue eyed people wouldn't have left. Edited April 17, 2014 by Acacia Sgt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 (edited) Because the blue eyed people reach the conclusion first, and leave. For example, let's say only 1 person had blue eyes. Everybody but him would think that there is either 1 (the blue eyed person they see) or 2 (the blue eyed person and themselves) blue eyed people. The blue eyed, seeing none, would think there is either none or 1 (himself). Since he knows the Guru saw a blue eyed person, then he, who sees none, concludes he is the one, and so leaves. After this everybody concludes that if the single blue eyed person left, then it's because he didn't saw anybody with blue eyes, and so concluded that he must be the only one if the Guru saw someone with Blue eyes. Since he left, then they conclude that they don't have blue eyes. This process is applied with more complexity as the number of blue eyed people increase, but the conclusion is the same. Once the blue eyed people realize they have them and leave, the rest can conclude that they don't have blue eyes, since otherwise the blue eyed people wouldn't have left. I see. So each blue eyed person needs to wait for [(Perceived # of Blue Eyes) + 1] days. All of the other blue eyed people do the same. Thus, when no one leaves on the (Perceived # of Blue Eyes)th day, they know that they, too, have blue eyes. I would never have figured that out on my own. Edited April 17, 2014 by Makaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euklyd Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Got it. Thanks to Makaze to confirming that I wasn't making shitty logical leaps. [4/17/14 3:21:06 PM] Makaze: What is the answer to the original riddle, then? [4/17/14 3:21:46 PM] Euklyd: [4/17/14 3:16:41 PM] Euklyd: they leave on D[number of blue people] [4/17/14 3:16:55 PM] Euklyd: And all at the same time. [4/17/14 3:21:49 PM] Euklyd: therefore D100 [4/17/14 3:21:52 PM] Euklyd: all the blue [4/17/14 3:22:32 PM] Euklyd: Is there something else that I need to answer? [4/17/14 3:23:24 PM] Makaze: Nope. Not sure if I would have figured it out entirely on my own, but I wasn't being led to the solution at all, so I'm happy. I'd say the thing that gave it away was Hextator's post about "it involves induction." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.