Jedi Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 FE6: Guinevere stole it to give to Roy, to keep it away from Zephiel, as it can break the seal on the Binding Blade (I also made the assumption it's what released Idoun, but I am less sure on this) How I forgot this just shows how long its been since I actually read FE6's story. Whoops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodperson707 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 Yeah, every FE has had an FE.FE1: The Shield of SealsFE2: There isn't one on Valentia, but the same universe as FE1FE3: Shield of Seals againFE4: The house crest of Velthomer, not important, but it's thereFE5: See FE4FE6: Guinevere stole it to give to Roy, to keep it away from Zephiel, as it can break the seal on the Binding Blade (I also made the assumption it's what released Idoun, but I am less sure on this)FE7: The FE is a coronation thingy, same one as in 6FE8: Grado's Sacred Stone is called the FEFE9: Lehran's Medallion is the FEFE10: See FE9FE11: See FE1FE12: See FE3FE13: The Shield of Seals again, though it no longer goes by that name The only thing i find weird is that some posters earlier in the thread mention aqua being a good keeper for the fire emblem as she seems to have water powers, but i don't see anything on that list with fire besides the magic "Flames" on the medallion in fe 9 and 10 and sorta Fe 6 as the thing it unlocks had fire power, and even less so the fire emblem from FE 4 belonging to the house with the holy fire tome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ereshkigal Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 Not sure about the shield of seals, but Grado's Sacred stone was called the FE because it would occasionally emit ghostly flames, at least IIRC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 Not sure about the shield of seals, but Grado's Sacred stone was called the FE because it would occasionally emit ghostly flames, at least IIRC. I think it was simply an "Emblem" with some neato abilities. It is quite interesting how the Emblem hasn't had any association with Fire for the most part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ereshkigal Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 (edited) I think it was simply an "Emblem" with some neato abilities. It is quite interesting how the Emblem hasn't had any association with Fire for the most part. Yes. As you know, the Stone of Grado is possessed of…unique powers. It was once used to seal away the Demon King, and it alone held the dark one’s soul. It burned within with the Demon King’s rage, and we called it the Fire Emblem. Prince Lyon and a team of mages skilled in ancient lore hoped to harness its energies. I remember the joy in Prince Lyon’s eyes when he spoke of using it to save lives. I think I just over-interpeted this line. Edited May 8, 2015 by L95 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 I think I just over-interpeted this line.Tbh the name makes the most sense in Sacred Stones.Knolls line and the fact the stones are "emblems" of the various nations power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goodperson707 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 (edited) okay but still no actual flames involved, on the title I guess manakete doesn't have a good ring to it, and there are too many games with dragons in the title, cause really sure theres always a Fire emblem but never actually having much to do with you know... Actual Fire. But its still a cool title so not many complaints from me there. Though what is it in Japanese? emblem of flames/fire right? Still it would be nice to have a fire emblem with more than a loose connection to fire (FEs4-7) or random spectral flames (FEs8-10) or a shield? (FEs1,3,11-13) Actually those numbers are kinda interesting we had two Fire emblems in a row that had a loose connection with flames (velthomor crest, elibian fire emblem) and two more in a row with spectral flames (stone of Grado, Lethran's medallion) plus the shield of seals but they were remakes and one sequel past FE4. So by those numbers we should have a different type of fire emblem this time though I'm not that hopeful on actual flames. Or my numbers mean nothing and i should get some sleep. You decide! FE if coming to stores in NA and EU hopefully pretty soonish. (Yeah it might be the sleep thingy) Edit woops no ghostly flames, hmm it sounded right to me. Well the sleep thing seemed to have won. Edited May 8, 2015 by goodperson707 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five5 Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 Could be confusing to newcomers if the medallion is the fire emblem and the themes of water continue around Aqua. It and Aqua's song must have a connection to Kamuis transformation, is she wearing it in the drowning scene? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ereshkigal Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 (edited) I don't think you can wear a song, but she is wearing the necklace, and it is glowing when the dragon reverts to a human-like form. Edited May 8, 2015 by L95 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyea Posted May 8, 2015 Author Share Posted May 8, 2015 If the FE is a dragonstone it could be associated with dragon-fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 Could be confusing to newcomers if the medallion is the fire emblem and the themes of water continue around Aqua. It and Aqua's song must have a connection to Kamuis transformation, is she wearing it in the drowning scene? And it was recently confirmed "Aqua has the power to heal with her songs" http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=53607 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DanMan Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 (edited) I agree with it having something to do with Aqua... if it even exists. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but not every Fire Emblem game has had something named after the titular artifact in it, right? EDIT: Beaten to the last bit. Edited May 9, 2015 by Leon of Nohr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book of Ereshkigal Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I agree with it having something to do with Aqua... if it even exists. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but not every Fire Emblem game has had something named after the titular artifact in it, right? EDIT: Beaten to the last bit. Every Fire Emblem has had a Fire Emblem in some way, and in varying levels of importance. Yeah, every FE has had an FE. FE1: The Shield of Seals FE2: There isn't one on Valentia, but the same universe as FE1 FE3: Shield of Seals again FE4: The house crest of Velthomer, not important, but it's there FE5: See FE4 FE6: Guinevere stole it to give to Roy, to keep it away from Zephiel, as it can break the seal on the Binding Blade (I also made the assumption it's what released Idoun, but I am less sure on this) FE7: The FE is a coronation thingy, same one as in 6 FE8: Grado's Sacred Stone is called the FE FE9: Lehran's Medallion is the FE FE10: See FE9 FE11: See FE1 FE12: See FE3 FE13: The Shield of Seals again, though it no longer goes by that name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethin Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 I'm kind of surprised no one's mentioned the "Bocca della Verita" golem as a possibility. Then again, the golem might just be a random Nosferatu... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurath8 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 (edited) I'm kind of surprised no one's mentioned the "Bocca della Verita" golem as a possibility. Then again, the golem might just be a random Nosferatu... Since the Fire Emblem tends to manifest itself as a small stone or set of stones, I doubt it's a monster this time. At risk of derailing this thread, have we actually seen or heard anything about that golem since the cameo in the January direct? Edited May 12, 2015 by Aurath8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hero of the Fire Emblems Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) I've heard, I could be wrong, but I've heard the Fire Emblem in 7 and 6 IS the Binding Blade itself; specifically the red circular gem in the center of it's hilt. Like the gemstones of the 1/3/11/12/13 Fire Emblem. And to unseal it, you must physically insert the gem back into the hilt. On the main subject, it would be cool for the Fire Emblem to be a person, either MU14 or Aqua (I FIRMLY REFUSE TO USE DEFAULT NAMES FOR AVATARS UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE), or a Dragonstone for MU. After all, the Binding Shield AND the Binding Blade both had strong ties to dragons before, so it's phesable they could return to that concept with Dragons finally back in the limelight after being sidelined since 7 (sans the remakes, 11 and 12). Edited May 13, 2015 by Hero of the Fire Emblems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Book Bro Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Now that we know all the royals have dragon blood but can't shapeshift like Kamui, I'm wondering if "Fire Emblem" isn't maybe the term used for a person that has dragon blood who can also transform into a dragon. New theory: Kamui's promoted class = Fire Emblem :> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.