Knife Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 (edited) When does it go too far? Obviously, killing human is regarded as univerally immoral. But what about other organisms? Is it right to kill something based on it's intelligence and size? Killing a monkey or a dolphin would probably be regarded as immoral compared to killing plants, bugs and germs. What makes one organism's life more important than the other? Edited December 6, 2008 by Knife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive Account Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Augh, another one of these. You seem to like debate Knife. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knife Posted December 6, 2008 Author Share Posted December 6, 2008 Augh, another one of these. You seem to like debate Knife. Nah, I just like starting the fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive Account Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Oh look Knife burnt down the forest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Judy Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Geez man another topic...they don't get anywhere... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLSothe Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 It depends, I suppose. If you kill an animal, you could be killing for meat. "There are two reasons to kill Son, self defense, and meat." -John Wayne. Truer words have never been spoken. If you want/need meat, killing an animal is perfectly acceptable. Would I eat a monkey? No. Do other people? Yeah. So, killing a monkey is obviously acceptable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emeraldfox Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Sooo..... If someone kills a human for meat it's just peachy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judas Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Everything must be killed. Destruction and mindless murder are the key to a fulfilled lifestyle. Blood for the Blood God! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kommissar Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 (edited) Killing doesn't, technically speaking, ever go "too far" until it hampers human social systems or human survival. Bad feelings over killing certain animals are probably a byproduct of our highly developed sociability. I assume you want a moralistic answer? Killing is usually wrong when it lacks a socially-approved utility. Killing out of malice is almost always regarded is wrong. Edited December 6, 2008 by Der Kommissar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral "Bull" Halsey Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Just what is it that you are trying to prove Knife? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLSothe Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Sooo..... If someone kills a human for meat it's just peachy? Perhaps you need to re-read my post. I said "if someone needs to kill an animal for meat, it's okay." Like it or not, meat is food. People will likely never abolish eating meat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Envoy of the Beginning Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Perhaps you need to re-read my post. I said "if someone needs to kill an animal for meat, it's okay." Like it or not, meat is food. People will likely never abolish eating meat. Except there's one thing....Humans are animals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esau of Isaac Posted December 6, 2008 Share Posted December 6, 2008 Killing non-sapient is much more acceptable than ending the life of a human. I'd say the less complex the creature is, and the less pleasing it is to the eye, the more acceptable it is to kill it. And of course the emotion it can exhibit. Few would care if I smashed a spider, but I am sure that there would be many speaking out if I killed a stray dog. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knife Posted December 6, 2008 Author Share Posted December 6, 2008 It depends, I suppose. If you kill an animal, you could be killing for meat. "There are two reasons to kill Son, self defense, and meat." -John Wayne. Truer words have never been spoken. If you want/need meat, killing an animal is perfectly acceptable. Would I eat a monkey? No. Do other people? Yeah. So, killing a monkey is obviously acceptable. What if they are really annoying? As in flies? Also, intelligent creatures are regarded as even worse to kill, but why is it that we value the life of intelligent things over the unintelligent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phoenix Wright Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 It really goes to "survival of the fittest" with this one. Of course, all the insects that aren't dangerous are killed anyway with pesticides and other stuff. But the answer is: No one cares [about the insects]. There are too many people afraid of "creepy-crawlies" to give anything to them. My big brother's girlfriend is different however, she'll kill insects, but actually feels bad for doing it. It also depends on how the animal is treated. Like Esau said, a dog being killed (not necessarily a stray) would be 100x sadder than a lion dying. Cuteness also matters to some guys and girls. For me, I'd rather not kill anything, but I do anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunny: spider bitten Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 From what I understand, Intelligence among animals has nothing to do with whether or not they become food. Utility>Intelligence in almost every situation. Cows are supposedly more intelligent than you average dog, but even the biggest nicest Bull does nothing that a decent Horse can't do better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
California Mountain Snake Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Cows are supposedly more intelligent than you average dog. You've never met a cow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Imagine getting jailed for washing your hands with soap. Killing is pretty much very "inmoral" but many ppl kill thousands of bugs, cows, chickens, pigs, etc. everyday. So really it's all about idk how to call it. :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Judy Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Well if someone wants to kill an animal for food I think that is alright. Though killing it for the pleasure of sport is cruel. Except there's one thing....Humans are animals. Say wut? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esau of Isaac Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 (edited) Well if someone wants to kill an animal for food I think that is alright. Though killing it for the pleasure of sport is cruel. I'd say that if it mattered whether it was cruel or not, they wouldn't die in the first place. I hardly care if my murderer will devour my flesh when I die. I don't see why it matters if we allow hunters to kill for food. Say wut? Humans are animals. Homo sapiens sapiens. Is there something weird about that? Edited December 7, 2008 by Esau of Isaac Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Judy Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Humans are animals. Homo sapiens sapiens.Is there something weird about that? Ah no nothing weird. Thanks for explaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lolDeath Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Obviously, killing human is regarded as univerally immoral. No it's not. It is supported under numerous circumstances in various cultures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 Wow, there are people who thought humans weren't animals? Crazy. Anyways, I find any species killing others of it's species wrong, but some animals naturally eat meat (like lions, tigers, humans, sharks) so fine, just don't eat crap of your own species plz k thx. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defeatist Elitist Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 (edited) Well, seeing as I'm not big on morals or ethics... I'll treat killing like everything else. It really must depend. For a human: If it is the only recourse that will surely benefit society, then yes. If the person could live a fully fruit full life on the other hand, it hopefully will be avoided. Sadly, if they're coming at you with a knife, that's kind of hard, and you're the stable one, so go ahead and live. I don't believe in the Death Penalty, but I understand that sometimes death can be the best course of action. For other animals, basically, as long as it helps. Animals have the right to be tasty. :P Edited December 7, 2008 by ZXValaRevan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kintenbo Posted December 7, 2008 Share Posted December 7, 2008 The only time I'd ever try to kill is if someone is trying to kill me. Even then, I'd search for an alternative, like disabling the assailant, first. Killing would be the very, very last option I'd choose. As far as animals go, kill for food or self-defense. I would never hunt for sport or just for the fun of it. Otherwise, I would rather not kill any living creature, even insects, but we all kill them by accident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.