Same question as below.
Staw man (misrepresenting your opponent's argument so that you can counter it; à la "People in the Middle East have good reasons to be angry at the US", countered by "How can you support something like terrorism?"), then faulty generalization, especially cherry picking (appealing to specific cases to support your point despite the body of evidence contradicting it), followed by argument from ignorance (claiming something is true because no one can prove it wrong).