Makaze

Actually, ##Unvote. I need to think about Shinori's logic.

What the hell? Okay... ##Vote: Lord Gaius

Nominations: 9: Integrity 9: Ein 8: necktie 7: shinpichu 6: Loki 4: Draco 1: Hero-King 1: Shezzy

It may be a little weird, but you'll see if/when I flip. On that note, Ghoulin is being a little scummy, only voting for Mancer's slot... Making no efforts to scumread anyone else. Even when they mention me, they waffle. Shouldn't he be more concerned to find out who was with FFM even if he's new?

Person

Rider

What a time to be alive... Nominations: 3: Integrity 3: Ein 3: shinpichu 1: Hero-King 1: necktie

I ask because I don't think "his newer stuff is meh" is any better than a case based on him subbing out. All the more when you had a strong townread on him.

Advice for future communities: You might look like less of a troll if you didn't use "Le" and "Craptain" in your usernames. To paraphrase the wisdom of the ages, ironic shitnaming is still shitnaming.

I'm town, man. You're right on the misrep. I'm sorry. I was desperate for associative reads and assumed everyone's early votes on FFM and FFM's early votes on others were telling of something. On my latest reread I concluded your RVS vote was truly random and not indicative. FFM's could be random too, but less likely since they are informed. I asked what it meant instead of saying "I scumread Mancer for subbing" because I don't scumread Mancer for subbing. I had to ask what it meant before it could affect my read. The answer to my question is obviously no. I realized it myself when you mentioned a doc just now because one scum subbing out wouldn't result in a no kill, or I don't think so. Everyone would have to abstain, not just one. Can you clear something up for me? Two days ago you said this: But now Mancer is your second highest scumread. Why did your read flip so strongly?

Nominations for #22 are open. Nomination ends next Tuesday.

... On the other hand, does anyone have any idea why scum didn't kill anyone last night? Could Mancer's subbing out have anything to do with it or no?

Oops. his RVS vote* Who do you actually read scum* Sorry...

Oh, happy birthday then! I believe you. Your reaction is great so I'm officially town reading you. If you don't like the Rapier case please provide an alternative or a better case on him when you get a chance.

Oh. Can't speak for others, but I was voting Mancer because of RVS votes and terse wording, until eclipse subbed in and generated better content. Given how Mancer subbed out it seems likely that or that and a combination of something else was the reason for the terseness and he RVS vote truly was random. Why do you actually read scum?

I started on associative reads right away... I read his ISO again and you're right. FFM didn't get more adamant about the Mancer vote. Just actually reasoned it out appropriate to the situation of a wagon. There are other potential reasons or Mancer to change speech patterns. Fewer reasons for you to act in town's interests. Overall this post seems town-oriented, so I'm reading your slot better until further notice. ##Unvote As for being tired, I've been working on my votal bot a lot which is distracting me from playing, plus AM/PM, but both are died down now. I'll make a bit more effort to case today. For the record I'm still pretty sure Paper is town now based on his content. I think Quote is 100% town cleared by FFM's vote. Reread of Lord Gaius shows he needs to post more substantial stuff, but his content this game is significantly better than it was in AM/PM and he was scum there. Gut town read. @Poly: Please give your associative reads and such on FFM's possible buddies. I just realized I don't have any good reason not to suspect you so you're null. Are you scum? Your vote on FFM could easily have been a bus vote (there was a votal that had FFM at 3 votes right above your vote). Rapier is still shadier than everyone else because of his weird backpedaling defense of keeping his vote on me when FFM had the wagon. [spoiler=The case]Initial weirdness: Upon being corrected: But then I voted for FFM. I'm pretty sure about this, by which I mean about 50% while everyone else is at 30% or worse. ##Vote Rapier

No comment on FFM's case on you either, for that matter.

Literally the next post:

Know what, going to go with the meta read for the first time. Still Rapier / Mancer > Lord Gaius, willing consolidate on either. ##Unvote ##Vote Mancer ##Votal

My point was you implied you weren't sure on the Shinori case but didn't bother to make any comments about the FFM wagon.

I wanted to say that too, but also it's possible it was a bus attempt because he knew he was going down, right? WiFOM similar to Lord Gaius. Plus the way he's wording his cases sounded weird and terse which is why I ISO'd him in the first place.

Now that you mention it, Mancer is a little suspicious for the same reason Lord Gaius is. Early vote on FFM, then moved off the wagon without explanation or mention of the FMM wagon. Plus, his cases on Shinori and you are super weak and he doesn't make much effort to push them. He made his Shinori case then sat on it despite apologizing for it later: Mancer said they didn't have time to review the info, but they stil could have voted for someone else or unvoted in the above post if they weren't confident anymore.

Western

Creative writing: The backstory for my hack character. Non-creative writing: Some essay post on a forum. Coding: Version 0.1.6 of my Votal Bot script.

Looking at FFM's posts and casers, the two most likely associative reads seem to be Lord Gaius and Rapier. Lord Gaius and FFM RVS voted each other then backed off of their votes soon after. They then ignored each other. WiFOM and therefore null, but worth noting. Rapier said they disliked FFM's play but excused it for because of newness, but when that reason fell short they kept their vote on me anyway and qualified their reason for staying put. Reads kind of like backpedaling? Rapier > Lord Gaius so far. ##Vote Rapier