FaxyWaxy Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 On an unrelated, but unpleasant note, lat night Mist........ ........ ....TURNED ME ON! ;O; *goes off to cry in shame about that* AH HA!!! the plot thickens Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 26, 2009 Author Share Posted June 26, 2009 AH HA!!! the plot thickens Oh no, this does not sound good. O_O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FaxyWaxy Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 MHUAHAHAHHA oh no it isnt, i know your deep dark secret on a brighter note, my tiles could be used for movement squares Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikethfc Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 Wait so CrashGordon is going to turn into mists no1 fanboy soon that wuold be so weird Although I think I play too much as well because whenever I read a book if they share the same name or is similar to a fire emblem character then I always imagine them looking like that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FaxyWaxy Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 Wait so CrashGordon is going to turn into mists no1 fanboy soon that wuold be so weirdAlthough I think I play too much as well because whenever I read a book if they share the same name or is similar to a fire emblem character then I always imagine them looking like that YES i do that too, it justs makes the character a whole lot cooler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 26, 2009 Author Share Posted June 26, 2009 MHUAHAHAHHAoh no it isnt, i know your deep dark secret on a brighter note, my tiles could be used for movement squares It's no secret, it was a mistake, a mistake I tell you! D: I even yelled at my personals for erecting! ;_; Lol, make sure to paint them the right colours! Wait so CrashGordon is going to turn into mists no1 fanboy soon that wuold be so weirdAlthough I think I play too much as well because whenever I read a book if they share the same name or is similar to a fire emblem character then I always imagine them looking like that No, No, NOOOOOOOOO! ;O; You mean like this: ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikethfc Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 You mean like this: ? All he needs is two animal buddies and the image is complete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Tarrasque Posted June 26, 2009 Share Posted June 26, 2009 Seriously, first I saw a Tom Cruise film called "Valkyrie" and thought to myself "Why make a Film about such a bad class?! Ah hahaha Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh even harder HAHAHAHAHA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 Ah hahahaOh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh even harder HAHAHAHAHA It's not THAT funny! :( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 It's absolutely hilarious that anyone could think the Valkyrie class is bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 It's absolutely hilarious that anyone could think the Valkyrie class is bad. It's easier if you've only played a game with a whole ONE valk, and not to mention that even people who like her think she sucks as an example of the class. And I heard being Mounted in the GBA game doesn't let you Canto, so it's pointless to take one over a Bishop or (possibly) Sage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 Higher movement is always more useful. Plus, it's not like you're always gonna have your high movement characters sit back with your low move characters, what if one of them gets hurt man? In other news, having a mounted magic user is fun. Mount>No mount. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 Higher movement is always more useful. Plus, it's not like you're always gonna have your high movement characters sit back with your low move characters, what if one of them gets hurt man? In other news, having a mounted magic user is fun. Mount>No mount. The unmounted Magic/Healing characters tend to have ENOUGH to be useful. Also, aren't the unmounted ones meant to have more MAG? And who gets hurt? The high move guys? the low move guys? In any case, they're close enough for assistance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 (edited) In any case? Any as in "Any case you could possibly think of" any case, or any case as in "any case that benefits what you think more than what benefits what I think"? Edited June 27, 2009 by Boat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 In any case? Any as in "Any case you could possibly think of" any case, or any case as in "any case that benefits what you think more than what benefits what I think"? Any case I've encountered while playing FE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 Well you fail Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 Why, because my Healers and Magic users don't need to be mounted to work? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 No. Why then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 It should be obvious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 I'm afriad it's not though, so you might as well tell me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 Actually it is completely obvious. You clearly don't have a brain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 THEN I was bouncing on my trampoline, and I looked into the glass windowed door of our summer house and saw ILYANA! You bounce on your trampoline? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 Actually it is completely obvious. You clearly don't have a brain. It is not to me. And I must have a brain, as a brain is needed to remain alive (I know you aren't being literal, but seriously, not seeing the occaisional obvious doesn't make me completely stupid, I was doing School work 2 years above my level just before the break I'm on). Now just say what it is, you are gaining nothing from doing this. You bounce on your trampoline? Yeah, so? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kintenbo Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 Yeah, so? You're supposed to boing on it, not bounce! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.