Mekkah Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Jamka!Faval would be tanky, but I dunno about the skillset and all. Pursuit/Charge/Critical. Looks like a great skillset to me, won't even need Ichieval to kill things. Of course, Faval hardly ever does...money really isn't much of an issue for someone who doesn't have trouble with arenas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Tarrasque Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 You mean Continue and not Critical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mekkah Posted July 6, 2009 Share Posted July 6, 2009 Right, I was confusing him with Noish. Whatever, Continue is even better than Charge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rei Rei Posted July 7, 2009 Share Posted July 7, 2009 So, for Faval it goes like this, then? Dew! Noish! Jamka! Lex! Noish! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just call me AL Posted July 7, 2009 Share Posted July 7, 2009 (edited) I'm pretty sure Holyn's below Dew last time I checked, not Noce. (And speaking of Noce, he's mentioned twice on that list.) Just pointing out a few errors. Edited July 7, 2009 by Little Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheetah7071 Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 In an attempt to blow the dust off of this topic, I have a proposal that would make this list doable. Instead of just having the global list and being done with it, instead rank each set of children independently (i.e., have a sety list, an arthur list, etc), and only include, say, the top three of each child in the global tier list. Maybe the bottom one too just for laughs. This cuts down the size of the global list from 208 to 77 (91 if we include the worst of each child as well). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodykitty Posted July 15, 2009 Share Posted July 15, 2009 (edited) In an attempt to blow the dust off of this topic, I have a proposal that would make this list doable. Instead of just having the global list and being done with it, instead rank each set of children independently (i.e., have a sety list, an arthur list, etc), and only include, say, the top three of each child in the global tier list. Maybe the bottom one too just for laughs. This cuts down the size of the global list from 208 to 77 (91 if we include the worst of each child as well). I would much rather see a global tier list, because it puts the individual children into better perspective relative to other characters. Edited July 15, 2009 by Chainey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dondon151 Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 I would much rather not see that tier list at all because it would hurt the eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Draper Posted July 16, 2009 Share Posted July 16, 2009 I actually agree, the tier list already looks stupid with every single pairing for a child right next to each, it just looks stupid. Keeping it to the top three should be good enough, at least for now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.