WeaponsofMassConstruction Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Baaaaa. Baaaaaaaaaaaaa. By the way, I think everyone has some kind of special role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 If it was anyone else making the suggestion of a mafia unlynchable ... D: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 I think light is or was trying too hard... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Spoon Posted June 6, 2010 Share Posted June 6, 2010 I'm only kidding, maybe. You may want to watch your back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crysta Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 I'll vote WoMC I guess, with Fayt's reasoning more or less. Pwning Sync and getting him out of the way doesn't strike me as a bad idea, either, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeaponsofMassConstruction Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Okay, I claim impulsive voter. I can't vote for anyone who has already gathered votes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Extremely suspicious of Fayt. Even if he IS the doctor he's effectively been neutralised with his stupid roleclaim, barring some kind of bulletproof doc, or...grannurse. And he's shown himself to be at least halfway competent...a better player than I am, and I wouldn't make that mistake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Okay, so if we were to take what Tables just said at face value, he's saying that the person he investigated last night was anti-town, and still very much alive. So if we take what he said at face value, we should try to figure out who he would investigate. I can think of four candidates. Ninji Fayt Zelpher Raymond WoMC Discuss, I guess. ...what I must've missed the point at which I suddenly became a decent investigation target. It escapes my comprehension why anyone would claim doc so early in the game while there's just a single vote on him, unless he isn't. Since Spoon seems to believe him, however, I'll go with WoMC for now. His roleclaim doesn't look very convincing at all, especially after that similar crap we got at CM2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Well, Spike's claim in CM2 turned out to be correct, so... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Well, Spike's claim in CM2 turned out to be correct, so... Spike's was correct, yes. Dracohon's wasn't. And I just generally find it hard to believe that there's a role in this game that sports nothing but a voting restriction. Not impossible, but... But if you've got another suspect that you deem worthwhile to check out I (and I guess everyone else as well) will happily listen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Spike's was correct, yes. Dracohon's wasn't. And I just generally find it hard to believe that there's a role in this game that sports nothing but a voting restriction. Not impossible, but... But if you've got another suspect that you deem worthwhile to check out I (and I guess everyone else as well) will happily listen. Ah, yeah. Well, the stuff I just said about Fayt still applies... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracohon Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Spike's was correct, yes. Dracohon's wasn't. And I just generally find it hard to believe that there's a role in this game that sports nothing but a voting restriction. Not impossible, but... This is probably a stupid time to say this, but I've got a role in this game that sports nothing but a voting restriction. I'm only allowed to vote for someone if they've already got the majority of votes. So yeah, basically I'm a forced bandwagoner. Also, I'm pretty sure I know what Fayt's doing, and I wouldn't suggest voting for him. And, now for the bandwagon vote: WoMC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crysta Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Wow. Vote restrictive roles suck. Can you like... not vote, or do you have to every day phase? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dracohon Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Nah, I can not vote if I want. I didn't vote last day phase. At least I don't think I did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeaponsofMassConstruction Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Can you guys think for yourselves for once? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliriyum Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Yeah I don't really like this vote. I'm not sure though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Got a better plan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balcerzak Posted June 7, 2010 Author Share Posted June 7, 2010 If you're going to change something, now is the time. I was actually just about to update the phase, but I can wait a little longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliriyum Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 The fact that WoMC claimed so early yesterday was weird, and his choice of claim was also weird. Definitely not ideal for mafia to do. If he was mafia, he would have chosen a role that gave us a reason to keep him around. I would ask to randomly pick someone else, but it's a little late for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_____ Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 I'm doubting WoMC's guilt, too, but I don't know who else to vote for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ether Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Like I said,we have no real evidence to work off of,and Sync is useless as he left on a roadtrip,so if we have a mediocre chance of hitting mafia,we may as well knock off the guys who won't be helpful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheezperson Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 I honestly think that Sync is the better vote. He's not going to do us ANY good for a while, and I see no reason to keep him over Weapons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 Well, I guess I see your point about Weapons. However, I really don't have any clue about who else to lynch. I really don't like lynching someone just for being inactive, mainly because I've made some pretty bad experiences with that recently. I would vote for Fayt instead, but Spoon seemed to trust him, so... I'm not sure. I would be willing to change my vote to a no lynch just to ensure that we don't lynch someone who might be a townie, but we really need some info from the power roles if we do another nl. What do you guys think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheezperson Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 No, a nl at this point would be a waste of a day. How long did Sync say he was going to be gone? And why are people so keen on taking out Weapons anyways? That list had 4 people's names on them, why choose Weapons? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crysta Posted June 7, 2010 Share Posted June 7, 2010 I guess we can lynch Sync next time if we don't have any better ideas. >_>; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.