Ilboss Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 Knight/General Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-Naut Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 FE4 Baron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Ithipathachai Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 (edited) Cavaliers (specifically Social Knights that can wield both Swords and Lances) and Paladins. They're so boring, yet usually so OP at the same time. Edited June 16, 2019 by Von Ithipathachai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiran_ Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 Knights/Generals and unpopular opinion, but Paladins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Ithipathachai Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kiran_ said: Knights/Generals and unpopular opinion, but Paladins. Thank you! I knew I wasn't the only one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair General Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 Designated healers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codename Shrimp Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 Cavaliers. They are boring and meh and are just used because they have high mov Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flere210 Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 I am going with paladins too. It's just idiotic how long they lasted as the best class whitout getting rebalanced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Mir Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 (edited) Foot axes in general. They tend to have sucky stats everywhere but HP and Strength, and are honestly the worst classes in the series. Edited June 17, 2019 by Shadow Mir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSbardock84 Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 Soldiers and villagers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yexin Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 griffon riders or whatever they're called Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaMonkey Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 (edited) Pegasus Knights. 1 hour ago, Shrimperor said: Cavaliers. They are boring and meh and are just used because they have high mov Yet you like Pegasus Knights, which are just the same, but they fly. Edited June 16, 2019 by NinjaMonkey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinskyHaaz Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Honestly, anything mounted. So pegasus riders, cavaliers and paladins of all sorts, and (to a lesser extent because they're cool as hell) wyvern riders. I just really like foot soldiers. Gotta make that action up close, on the ground, and personal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowEFX Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 (edited) So much distaste for the mounted units I see... Personally I find it hard to use Fighters or other ground-based Axe classes Edited June 17, 2019 by ShadowEFX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ertrick36 Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 I'd just like a game that properly balanced cavaliers like Thracia did. Either that, or enable everyone to use mounts, 'cuz there's not much point in using infantry units if you can use cavaliers instead. That's why I dislike them. Armor knights really just need to not have the movement decrease. I get that they're trying to go for this whole idea where they take up the rear like a sort of phalanx (because that's what actual heavy infantry would do; they're always in the back of any charge), but we're never using a proper military force; it's always a ragtag band of soldiers, mercenaries, and even civilian militants who have varying masters and causes to fight for. So making armor knights slow to emulate military tactics doesn't work, it just makes them the worst units in the game. Don't like axe-wielding infantry in a lot of games. They're only really good in Thracia, and that's mostly thanks to the units taking on those classes being stupid strong (like Orsin with his Bhuj axe). Same goes for Sacred Stones; Ross has stupid good growths and the ability to pick a class line that'll eventually let him scale mountains and cross seas, so he's naturally one of the best examples of an axe-fighter in the series. Otherwise, they pretty much always suck at hitting things, and their bloated HP won't save their garbage defenses. Which makes me think... I would love to see someone make Rhajat into an oni savage and just try to make her actually function as a unit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Myrmidon. Swordlock, low strength, luck-based survivability? Oof. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Beast units. I'm okay with manaketes tho (as long as they're not creepy lolis). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Landmaster Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Archers, generally (never cared for the mechanics of Bows being sitting ducks to melee weapons)~ Also never cared much for Pegasi because they're weak to bows so I always find them very annoying to try to grind. On top of that, seems like most characters I just happen to dislike are Pegasus Knights~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anaphora Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Sadly archers.  They're useful for Wyvern Riders and other similar units, but overall are usually underwhelming.  It's sad because I loved Niles as a character in Fates, but never used him much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Mir Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 (edited) 11 hours ago, Ertrick36 said: Don't like axe-wielding infantry in a lot of games. They're only really good in Thracia, and that's mostly thanks to the units taking on those classes being stupid strong (like Orsin with his Bhuj axe). Same goes for Sacred Stones; Ross has stupid good growths and the ability to pick a class line that'll eventually let him scale mountains and cross seas, so he's naturally one of the best examples of an axe-fighter in the series. Otherwise, they pretty much always suck at hitting things, and their bloated HP won't save their garbage defenses. Which makes me think... I would love to see someone make Rhajat into an oni savage and just try to make her actually function as a unit. I honestly fail to see how Ross is an exception when his growths aren't that good other than HP, Strength and Luck (AKA, typical axe unit). I don't see crossing seas or mountains as very practical in the grand scheme of things, either. It also doesn't help that there's only one Ocean Seal short of the secret shop... which isn't until 2/3 of the way through the game. Edited June 17, 2019 by Shadow Mir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
May Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Archers/Snipers (for now). 1-3 range archers seems like the standard going forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anathaco Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Pegasus Knights. Never had one that felt satisfying to use or even grew well. I just hate units who can’t deal damage (though I have yet to play Shadow Dragon and I hear Caeda is really good in that game). I’m also not the biggest fans of their characters, they always feel too tropey or bland to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightcosmo Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Going to go with Knight's as well. Not because moving or stats, just not a fan of the design of them. I don't hate any class on a gameplay level, and i'm not going to hate on cavalier for being good. Is it wrong to give the player an edge somewhere? I dunno, I don't see anything wrong with it, though. Sure, you could say it's poor balancing, but when isn't Fire Emblem poorly balanced? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMinus Posted June 17, 2019 Share Posted June 17, 2019 Troubadours because i think it's weird that in a lot of games, they're a straight upgrade to clerics/priest. It's obviously still a good class, but i don't like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilboss Posted June 17, 2019 Author Share Posted June 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, MrMinus said: Troubadours because i think it's weird that in a lot of games, they're a straight upgrade to clerics/priest. It's obviously still a good class, but i don't like it. I agree, units like Priscilla make units without a mount (Like Serra) almost obsolete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.