Jump to content

Can someone help me solve these two trig identities?


Darros
 Share

Recommended Posts

Holy crap. I've been working on these for a while, and I do NOT get them. Also, I can only prove using one side of the equation, not alter both.

These are the problems.

work1.png

and

work2.png

Edited by Skasaher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The second one you can rearrange the last term to (1/cos^2)/(1/sin^2), which is just tan^2. on the LHS you simplify sin^2 + cos^2 to make 1

so you end up with 1 sec^2 =2+tan^2 or sec^2=1+tan^2 which is what you get if you divide the sin^2 + cos^2=1 by cos^2.

ANd I'm about to start the other one so I'll get back to you on it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay for the first one I noticed you said to only focus on one side so for the LHS:

you can factor out cos^2 for the num. and denom

Cos^2(1-tan^2)/cos^2(1+tan) which leaves you with 1-tan^2/1+tan

By completing the square you can show that 1-tan^2=(1+tan)(1-tan) which leaves you with 1-tan on the LHS

Multiply by tan and you get tan*(cot-1) as cot=1/tan multiplying by tan is the same as dividing by cot so you get:

cot-1)/cot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How often are you right about anything little boy? I had to unignore your post because I knew it would be hilariously off.

I'm not sure what gives you the right to be suck a fucking prick, especially since asking for help is better than not doing so and leaving yourself hanging out to dry.

Also, the most useful trig identities in general are:

(sinx)^2 + (cosx)^2 = 1

(secx)^2 - 1 = (tanx)^2

(cscx)^2 - 1 = (cotx)^2

You can form all the other identities from those. Once you get the hang of those, trig identities with single angles aren't too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say that like I was talking to you. I wasn't. Learn to infer.

Actually though he never asked to be told "what gives [me] the right to be suck a fucking prick", so I guess any query was implied if present at all.

Still, typically people want to know the answer to something when they complain about not knowing it, so I pre-empted him.

Edited by Obviam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say that like I was talking to you. I wasn't. Learn to infer.

No, you learn to use the quote button.

Still, typically people want to know the answer to something when they complain about not knowing it, so I pre-empted him.

That's fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think fucking run to me. I'm not even about to give a fuck. Query someone who cars.

I tried but Michael Schumacher's fully booked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you so so so much Mike and Mercenary Raven, I got it done!! If it's not a hassle, I'd like this thread locked now please. ._.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...