Makaze
-
Posts
637 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Makaze
-
the great member sorting chart - where will you go!?
Makaze replied to Chen's topic in Far from the Forest...
Agreed. Arbacative? -
the great member sorting chart - where will you go!?
Makaze replied to Chen's topic in Far from the Forest...
['Makaze'].sort(); -
Nominations: 10: Loki 6: TheEnd 4: necktie 4: Soledai 3: Draco 2: Rehab 2: Integrity 2: Lettuce 2: ZM 1: Horace 1: Carmine Sword 1: Shirley 1: Carter 1: Roy
-
function slush() { if (lemon && cone) { return 'snow cone'; } else { return 'slush'; } }
-
Example of what you could do: When someone says they are confused about what you meant or says, "They could have meant this or that," showing that they don't get it, you can clarify it instead of saying "|:". I agree that we'd have to talk to get anywhere. But things like replies of "|:" aren't a conversation, to me. It's customary to clear up confusion if you want the conversation to continue. When you don't do what other people do when they want the conversation to continue, it makes sense to assume the reason you did not clear it up is because you don't want it to continue. "Someone who wants the conversation to continue will clear up confusion." "I am confused." "Ein does not clear up the confusion." "Therefore, Ein does not want the conversation to continue." Seems deductively valid, to me.
-
Personally I can believe that you think the conversation is a waste of time because of your non-answers. Look at your posts in this conversation so far: What happened: I offered you an example where I wasn't sure which you meant. I expressed that I needed more info. And you responded with a blank face. That makes me think that you are not interested in clearing up my confusion. Your priority lies with expressing how disappointed you are that I didn't figure it out on my own. It's an example of what I said in this post: You put the burden of figuring out what you mean on others instead of being clear in the way you express yourself. We might get the idea you feel it's our fault if we don't understand instead of changing your own approach to how you say express it. It's not much of a leap to assume you think it's not worth talking with us because we won't understand you in the first place.
-
If one is correct, you should state which it is. If neither are correct, you should offer the correct assumption. You're digging your own grave by not offering any feedback.
-
Yes. This is a good example. I can't tell if you agree or think that having a conversation is not worthwhile. Tempted to assume the latter because of the 'rite'.
-
I've observed that you have a habit of saying something passively or vaguely aggressive and then say things like, "You know exactly what I mean," or something else that isn't a straight answer. They often don't know why you said what you did, and therefore they can't get a read on its seriousness.
-
I heard some people want to be able to ignore quotes...? But I suppose that would be silly when you can see posts that respond to the quotes.
-
Either very long or curly. Medium: Depends. I enjoy shows a lot because there is more content, but films are consistently higher quality.
-
Nominations for #14 are open. Nomination ends next Tuesday.
-
Yes. All the time.
-
The lost children are a spectacular mushroom cloud in the sky!
-
2. What is or has been your greatest obsession? 3. What have you felt the strongest about? Why? 4. Red pill or blue pill? Why? 5. What is your dream profession? Sorry if any of these have already been asked.
-
Due
-
Kill
-
Bee
-
It's believed in general Christian ideology that demons are spirits. They can possess or haunt objects as well as people.
-
-
"But I don't think every sweater you get from Goodwill has demons in it." In the running for quote of the year.
-
Ciraxis, alone in the desert.
-
Not really. Don't know who most of them are.
-
They had mutually exclusive member bases.
-
It is just me or this thread slowly becoming the new FE4 Thread in all but name?
