Makaze
-
Posts
637 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Makaze
-
Well excuuuuuuuuse me.
-
Tear is my waifu, just letting you guys know
Makaze replied to Safyrya's topic in Far from the Forest...
I'm getting déjà vu... -
Tear is my waifu, just letting you guys know
Makaze replied to Safyrya's topic in Far from the Forest...
That last post makes me think Safyrya is not trolling. -
I mean... I could go with my gut on someone else, but I'm getting bad vibes from what he has done. Especially with the question dodging. Care to sell me on someone who looks more like scum? @Cam: Please give reads. You've essentially jumped on and off of individual targets only to revert without voting and that has not been helped at all. Please post something helpful.
-
As others have said, NO. Sorry, but I'm feeling better about my vote every time you post.
-
Tear is my waifu, just letting you guys know
Makaze replied to Safyrya's topic in Far from the Forest...
There is a joke I could make about that but I'll leave it implied. -
This post is lazy. Maybe I'm being counter-productive here but it feels weird when people agree with me after all this time. Please expand on the intent you read behind all of these people. Can you please answer my questions? @Hosts: Can we get votals so far? We went through a lot of pages with minimal voting...
-
Amazing.
-
Tear is my waifu, just letting you guys know
Makaze replied to Safyrya's topic in Far from the Forest...
-
How did you profit from soft claiming? How did town profit?
-
Okay. I can get how it's anti-town to ask for the role itself. But if you can forgive that mistake, the more important questions are still unanswered... The ones we actually need, I mean. Which is also suspicious. Why soft claim? Not answered. How could the role have been proven? Not answered. But they went ahead and answered with which role it was... Why would they soft claim and then full claim without reason? I don't feel any better about it than I did before I asked.
-
Okay... So the soft claim they made was not suspicious at all? Wouldn't they only profit from such a soft claim if they were scum?
-
What is bad about prodding someone about their role after they went out of their way to mention it? AKA if they weren't planning to answer these, why would they go out of their way to hint that they had a role? I am not being disingenuous. I really don't see any problem. Apparently I have short term memory loss with this game. Cam is more suspicious than previously thought. He was tunneling on me and asking for citations and the like without voting me. I wasn't able to think clearly then but with a clearer head... It's clear he is trying to keep me on the defensive by asking me to prove things while contributing little himself. Leaning more scum given the FFM vote and dismissal of the Paperblade case... And still no input on that case. On FFM, I'm actually struggling to find anything inherently scummy in their actions. I can't even find the things that originally bothered me. I think I may have been swayed by others' reads in the midst of all that happened D1. Role reversal for those two. Cam is my second scum read unless he can come up with a great explanation for the FFM vote and lack of case on Paper.
-
Please elaborate. What role do you have? How could you have proven it? Why did you mention that you were a role when said role can still confirm you town and get you killed? How did claiming that you had a role profit town enough that your inevitable death wouldn't matter?
-
You're backpedaling. You said it was suspicious that I brought up ITP. I said that if I wanted to draw attention away from it I wouldn't have asked about it. You said someone else beat me to it. I proved you wrong. Sangyul never would have posted that about the ITP if I hadn't asked about it. Where are you going with this? What aren't you buying? That I missed the post? You have a strange concept of the word defense.
-
Fair enough. Been scum hunting a little between posting. I feel I've given my biggest read and most other people don't have anything that comes close to a strong scum tell. Psych is still reading confirmed scum. I can't imagine what they could say that could make up for not voting Paper and soft claiming a PR out of nowhere. On my past reads, Darros has done several things that make a lot of sense for town, including the way he has addressed me. He is my biggest town read actually. Cam... Mostly null. Need more posts as of D2, but not voting Paper is suspicious. The most suspicious thing on FFM at the moment now is their absence in D2, which is why I need more content. FFM still has a lot of suspicious activity, but less of a priority than Psych. My gut says he is town for reasons aforementioned, but it's possible he bussed on Paper. Would be onky with lynching him as a secondary. Eury pretty much cleared themselves by giving good arguments but I'm still not sure why they are so adamant; seemed to jump on me with fervor specifically because I prodded them. I would like to requests prods on bladesceape and Kay because they have not voted or given any reads at all.
-
I'm kind of baffled here. Do I need to bold the sentence? "Does this mean we have a serial killer or can't we know?" "Does this mean we have a serial killer" "serial killer" It doesn't get more blatant than that. On the quote: Not true. I suppose my lack of knowledge was only implied and got caught in the 'playing dumb' thing, but I did heavily imply I did not know that it was a hostile role before stating that no one had said so explicitly. @Eury: There is a difference between being silent to avoid being read initially like ZM did and changing behavior because you are the target of a lynch mob. What I said makes perfect sense, if a person cannot speak without hurting town. I haven't stopped completely, though; see me talking now? That said, you did a great job of arguing against me there, even using my own points. I can see why you think I'm the SK and would agree with you if it weren't me.
-
Welp. Sorry for the prod then. Why didn't you quote that earlier? Would have saved a world of trouble.
-
Uh... Yes it did. It was the very first thing in the post. Then I followed up when Boron said that we did in fact know that it was a hostile third party.
-
Okay, my mistake. You didn't out that it was a hostile third part, unless I missed it. That's what raised my brow--you added that the third party was definitely hostile and it didn't seem to fit your earlier description of the Numbers role.
-
#301 & #302 if the image doesn't sell you.
-
Read back one further. My post was first:
-
When I asked about a survivor, I was playing dumb. I thought it would help to hear how you knew it was an SK. I was fishing for anyone with info on the third party. I also know practically nothing about mafia outside of the traditional VT/DOC/COP/MG setup. There are some bizarre roles in this game and I thought it could have been a night vig (if those are a thing), an SK, or some kind of special Mafia role, too. I got the info I wanted but not because what I did was smart, as (I think it was Darros?) pointed out.
-
Really? Who brought it up first? I thought I read at least skimmed every post from the start of the day. @Sangyul: You have me on that. I'll try to keep it down. Don't expect my play to become less chaotic on a dime though. @Eury: I'm getting confused. Your vote on Psych makes a lot more sense than your vote on me. What makes you more confident about my intent than his? I don't really care if it riles feathers, so long as they are the ones of the person I'm reading. See: My prod to you. It becomes an issue when my scumhunting makes people other than the ones I'm reading get all upset. It's anti-town to make myself a lynch target; logically, if I can't speak without hurting town, I shouldn't speak at all.
-
On a purely rational side, this doesn't make sense. If I wanted to draw attention away from it, especially in the interest of keeping the third party away from me, I would not bring it up on my own. I would have no reason to connect myself to the third part by mentioning it. I would have good reason to purposefully avoid the subject the third party entirely unless someone else accused me first.
