a.f.k.a. Howard Hughes Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 I just loove being voted day 1 for missunderstanding I deserve a medal for not losing my bet yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaybee Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Except that was the reason he started off with, and he just changed his story so he's have a semi-credible reason to lynch Nightmare now. And Nightmare's nowhere near being the scummiest player here, and it also doesn't shed any light on 13th's alliance. If Nightmare is mafia, 13th could be lucky town or mafia who failed at WIFOMing their teammate to safety. If Nightmare is town, 13th is unlucky town or mafia who just pulled a fucking successful persuade out of nothing, because their scumbuddy helped orchestrate the lynch. how often someone who is target of persuation votes on d1 is lynched d1? Persuator is scummy role so people rather wont follow his will. In other words perusator disencourages people from voting for the target. because it gives info about the intentios of persuator and because I though that persuating does everything but makes nighty likely to be lynched. Of course all this lost its importance when 13th claimed persuator. Only thing why its still discussed is rapier bringing the matter back up again and again and again to the point where me repeating my -yes rather bad theory that I didn't even believe at in that point anymore- answer makes it look like i still wanted to lynch nighty. Did I make myself clear enough? May I point out I have been voting 13th ever since he claimed and stopped only at this very page. Just read the top part for the "persuader's intentions" thing. You know what, fine, I give up, I don't get it anymore (once again). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.f.k.a. Howard Hughes Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Last time I checked I have been running for lynching rapier Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Actually, it was last page Sho, quit ignoring the logic. WE WILL USE THAT AGAINST YOU THE REST OF THE GAME. And I will point out, one last time, that I chose Rein to vote Nightmare at complete random. I had no intentions on why I chose who I did. It lets me know what happens when it occurs. In retrospect, the flavor was hilarious. But that is besides the point. I chose the people I did not because of who they were, but because I wanted to know what happened. It lets me know how the persuasion works, if its done automatically in the thread, if its changed in the end, if the player is PM'd the person who they are voting for and they have to post it in the thread themselves, whatnot. I have said this for a while now, but I am not obsessing over it like you are obsessing about the not voting for nighty lynch thing. So with that said, I will probably be sitting here waiting for the next 90 minutes or so, just continuing to argue with Sho Everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.f.k.a. Howard Hughes Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Actually, it was last page Sho, quit ignoring the logic. WE WILL USE THAT AGAINST YOU THE REST OF THE GAME. And I will point out, one last time, that I chose Rein to vote Nightmare at complete random. I had no intentions on why I chose who I did. It lets me know what happens when it occurs. In retrospect, the flavor was hilarious. But that is besides the point. I chose the people I did not because of who they were, but because I wanted to know what happened. It lets me know how the persuasion works, if its done automatically in the thread, if its changed in the end, if the player is PM'd the person who they are voting for and they have to post it in the thread themselves, whatnot. I have said this for a while now, but I am not obsessing over it like you are obsessing about the not voting for nighty lynch thing. So with that said, I will probably be sitting here waiting for the next 90 minutes or so, just continuing to argue with Sho Everyone. The problem is not using it against me, its using it illogically against me. see there is difference between actively suggesting nighty lynch and suggesting it at the start but then changing my option as more information came up. Back in the early steps of game there was really just about nothing to be gained from just about any lynch considering the amount of information we had. Killing nighty might have given us something about the persutor or might not. Sure it was slight lead but better than nothing. Once you claimed, better reasons for lynches came up and I gave up on the nighty thing. This just isn't scummy in my eyes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.f.k.a. Howard Hughes Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Oh and jb, I think that persuating vote on someone makes them less likely to be lynched. You think otherwise. our opinion this is differnet. Try to llok it at my point of view and maybe you see it differently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Unfortunately, Sho, everyone else decides your fate. You've set off the scumdars of several people, including me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.f.k.a. Howard Hughes Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Unfortunately, Sho, everyone else decides your fate. You've set off the scumdars of several people, including me. So its unreasonable to consider the option im not scum? wow you sound very scummy right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paperblade Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 IT'S SPELLED PERSUADING JESUS CHRIST ##Vote: Proto policy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 And me. You have been setting mine off since Rapier was asking you, and you kept getting angry about it and making less and less and less sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Maybe the Mafia think me useful as a way to hide, use a protection ability if they have one on me, and use that to frame me as Mafia. Just a possibility. I honestly think Sho is the best lynch here, though. His lack of sense and pulling bullcrap out of every single pore in his body to justify himself is not helping his image here. But I know one major thing. I will not live to see the next day phase. Nothing will help me live past the night phase, unless Nags is really crazy and we have no Vig. That alone would make me wonder. not having a vig is not uncommon,specially in small games.I wouldn't be surprised if no vigs exist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 So its unreasonable to consider the option im not scum? wow you sound very scummy right now You're doing a terrible job convincing me otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliriyum Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 ##unvote hmmm Honestly I don't think either Sho or Rapier is scum :/ Not sure what to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 IT'S SPELLED PERSUADING JESUS CHRIST ##Vote: Proto policy ##Vote Paperblade That is a very scummy move, explain yourself for these actions! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deliriyum Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Need I say that adding superfluous hashtags will only serve to confuse the kind souls who tally votals? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 IT'S SPELLED PERSUADING JESUS CHRIST ##Vote: Proto policy Requesting for insta mod kill on Paperblade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.f.k.a. Howard Hughes Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 He was basing my scummyness on old theory. of course I get irritated when he brings it back up again and again and again. The thing is I suggest you to read my older post in the light they are suppose to read. That is Rapier asks about my old theory and I answer. As Strawman has said my post are not that scummy in the context you seems to be forgetting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Core: I was making a joke. We do that here. Blitz: He's not playing, there's no hidden players. Sho: We are reading them in the correct light. The "Scumhunt for anything we can use" Light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Unfortunately, Sho, everyone else decides your fate. You've set off the scumdars of several people, including me. I still think Sho is being himself and you are being scummy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Blitz, you best explain yourself. NOW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Need I say that adding superfluous hashtags will only serve to confuse the kind souls who tally votals? lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Core: I was making a joke. We do that here. Blitz: He's not playing, there's no hidden players. Sho: We are reading them in the correct light. The "Scumhunt for anything we can use" Light. that was a joke,seriously, get some sleep before you decide to claim fool again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitz Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Blitz, you best explain yourself. NOW. your unwavering defense on Nightmare with no N0 seems very scummy to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a.f.k.a. Howard Hughes Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 Core: I was making a joke. We do that here. Blitz: He's not playing, there's no hidden players. Sho: We are reading them in the correct light. The "Scumhunt for anything we can use" Light. SO when something is not supposed as active part of convo but to answer one person, it should be used as if it was part of active convo? wow you are scummy ##Unvote: Rapier ##Vote: 13th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
13th Posted January 2, 2012 Share Posted January 2, 2012 I'm going to make a quick analysis on some possibilities on why he thinks that Assumption: Sho is Town Reasoning: Blitz is lucky and thinks you're scum for some absurd reason Assumption: Sho is Mafia Reasoning One: Blitz is misinterpreting the posts and thinks he is town Reasoning Two: Blitz is Mafia, defending his teammate, and is trying to pin the scum on a good player. Assumption: Blitz is Mafia, Sho is Town Assuming this is true, Blitz knows Sho is safe, and wants to try and pin the blame on Eclipse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.