Esme Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 gamma master race Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 But I'm beta! EDIT: No I'm Omega! I'd consider myself Omega as well, archetype-wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 I'd consider myself Omega as well, archetype-wise. There's this one fictional book about wolves I read (vaguely like a watership down for wolves) where the super weak wolfy in the pack was called an omega. He was also known as a sikla. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 There's this one fictional book about wolves I read (vaguely like a watership down for wolves) where the super weak wolfy in the pack was called an omega. He was also known as a sikla. Hmmm. That's very different from the usage I've heard. In the usages I'm used to, there are three main types: Alpha, the one who takes charge of a group in a social setting. Beta, the one who follows an alpha in a social setting. Omega, the one who makes their own way without leading or following. The Omega is often weak due to lack of social support but they are decidedly not with a pack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 Hmmm. That's very different from the usage I've heard. In the usages I'm used to, there are three main types: Alpha, the one who takes charge of a group in a social setting. Beta, the one who follows an alpha in a social setting. Omega, the one who makes their own way without leading or following. The Omega is often weak due to lack of social support but they are decidedly not with a pack. When I think of omega I usually think of "I am alpha, I am omega." Anyway, it was just a novel, so I wouldn't be surprised if the meaning was adulterated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esau of Isaac Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 I'll start by saying BMI is a pile of horseshit. It does not take your muscle and bone mass into consideration (they weigh substantially more than body fat), and considers you to be made of nothing but body fat. According to this bullshit mass indicator, the fittest and leanest rugby players in the world are "obese" because they weigh a lot more than your thin, no-muscle person of the same height. It doesn't really take anything into account. It's literally just a measure of your weight to your height. Anyone who lends it much credence beyond the simplest of rules of thumb is cuhrazy. Anyways, autism ahead I'm going to assume that 50% is the average growth rate. HP: 40% STR: 60% SKL: 40% SPD: 65% LUK: 50% DEF: 35% RES: 30% So does that mean my end stat gains would probably look like this? HP: 16 STR: 24 SKL: 16 SPD: 26 LUK: 20 DEF: 14 RES: 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 (edited) It doesn't really take anything into account. It's literally just a measure of your weight to your height. Anyone who lends it much credence beyond the simplest of rules of thumb is cuhrazy. Anyways, autism ahead I'm going to assume that 50% is the average growth rate. HP: 40% STR: 60% SKL: 40% SPD: 65% LUK: 50% DEF: 35% RES: 30% So does that mean my end stat gains would probably look like this? HP: 16 STR: 24 SKL: 16 SPD: 26 LUK: 20 DEF: 14 RES: 12 Yes... Very close, actually. Not counting promotion gains and such and assuming you start with 1 in each stat. Mine: HP: 14 Str/Mag: 12 Skill: 21 Spd: 18 Luck: 6 Def: 27 Res: 27 Still no idea for a class. High defense Bishop? Edited June 30, 2014 by Makaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pull My Devil Trigger Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 why not high resistance knight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 why not high resistance knight 14 HP. I guess it's possible but someone already turned it down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moira Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 (edited) maybe you started as a priest/cleric, went to bishop, and class changed into the knight path? just looking at the stat increases you got and forgetting what your actual growths are. Edited June 30, 2014 by Fluorspar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 (edited) Terrible. HP 35% Str/Mag 30% Skill 55% Speed 45% Luck 15% Def 70% Res 70%A Knight, maybe? Edited June 30, 2014 by Makaze Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 What the. . . I AM THE LAMBDA, GET AT ME. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.