Raven Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 (edited) Not gonna post them here for obvious reasons (posting n00ds gets your SF account banned, in case you don't know) but if you so much as google for it, you'll find them easily. I'm just saying this here so you good people here know they exist. Particular favourites of mine are of Jennifer Lawrence. Everything else doesn't matter to me. Edited September 5, 2014 by Integrity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passionfruit Cappuccino Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 While i find it to be a very unfair and horrendous thing in regards to the people involved, the pictures kinda make me a tad happy about it :/. Kate Upton tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 if they didn't want the pictures leaking out, shouldn't have let them exist in the first place. I'm not saying it's their fault, but it's not not their fault, either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 haven't looked, don't intend to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkhead Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 if they didn't want the pictures leaking out, shouldn't have let them exist in the first place. I'm not saying it's their fault, but it's not not their fault, either. ^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magical Glace Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Who cares? Unless Ciel Phantomhive or Kagamine Len or Utatane Piko or [long list of fictional people] are among them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrightBow Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Okay, how could one's conscience possible allow someone to go after those images? It's bad enough that the privacy of these people has been violated, but there is no need to turn yourself into an accomplice of the act too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 I don't think me posting this here will make any difference on the amount of coverage this has already received. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrightBow Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 (edited) I don't think me posting this here will make any difference on the amount of coverage this has already received. Since when is "everybody else is doing it" an accessible excuse? I get the concept of peer pressure but I don't see that applying here. As if the fact that those images are accessible because of some asshole changes anything about them being nobody's business but the people featured on them. If something was okay simply because it was possible, then we wouldn't need any laws ever. And you do seem to at least think that your topic will make a difference, given that you wrote in your OP that you made this topic specifically so that "the good people here know they exist". Edited September 1, 2014 by BrightBow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragoncat Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 if they didn't want the pictures leaking out, shouldn't have let them exist in the first place. I'm not saying it's their fault, but it's not not their fault, either. This... But I do feel bad for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 Since when is "everybody else is doing it" an accessible excuse? I get the concept of peer pressure but I don't see that applying here. As if the fact that those images are accessible because of some asshole changes anything about them being nobody's business but the people featured on them. If something was okay simply because it was possible, then we wouldn't need any laws ever. And you do seem to at least think that your topic will make a difference, given that you wrote in your OP that you made this topic specifically so that "the good people here know they exist". I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to argue here. If you're that mad about it, go on other internet social websites where there are thousands upon thousands of internetters fully aware of this situation and sharing the images. I for one think Jennifer Lawrence is smoking hot, so I'm pretty happy to have seen the evidence to back up my assumptions. You can do what you like, I'm not bothered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciarre Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 if they didn't want the pictures leaking out, shouldn't have let them exist in the first place. I'm not saying it's their fault, but it's not not their fault, either.dude, what Those were pictures intended to be for her significant other. In NO WAY is it her fault that a hacker got a hold of them. "Shouldn't have let it exist in the first place" is a bullshit excuse, please stop jennifer lawrence is pretty damn hot, not disagreeing, but it's not her fucking fault jfc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 I'm not saying it's their fault, but it's not not their fault, either. @_@ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shahrivar Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 I only cared for the Kirsten Dunst ones, but they were deleted already. Didn't bother to investigate further. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciarre Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 also one other thing to note is that hackers also got a hold of pictures that were deleted off icloud @_@ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 dude, what Those were pictures intended to be for her significant other. In NO WAY is it her fault that a hacker got a hold of them. "Shouldn't have let it exist in the first place" is a bullshit excuse, please stop jennifer lawrence is pretty damn hot, not disagreeing, but it's not her fucking fault jfc I didn't say that it was her fault. However the fact that they merely exist means that there is a possibility - no matter how remote - that things will leak out into places where these pictures weren't intended to reach. And that's exactly what happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freohr Datia Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Sure there was a risk, but knowing that they didn't want others to see it at all says to me that we should respect that. No matter how much "they should have seen it coming." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 (edited) I didn't say that it was her fault. However the fact that they merely exist means that there is a possibility - no matter how remote - that things will leak out into places where these pictures weren't intended to reach. And that's exactly what happened. If a celebrity such as Lawrence even goes nude to use a bathtub or shower, or in her house or trailer or something, there is a possibility - no matter how remote - that some asshole tabloid photographer will get a shot. It may be advisable to protect one's private property and person, but that's not the same thing as suggesting one is in any way liable for that. Edited September 1, 2014 by SeverIan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Posted September 1, 2014 Author Share Posted September 1, 2014 Sure there was a risk, but knowing that they didn't want others to see it at all says to me that we should respect that. No matter how much "they should have seen it coming." Not even that they should have seen it coming. They obviously assumed their content was safe/deleted/whatever, but that wasn't the case. If a celebrity such as Lawrence even goes nude to use a bathtub or shower, or in her house or trailer or something, there is a possibility - no matter how remote - that some asshole tabloid photographer will get a shot. It may be advisable to protect one's private property and person, but that's not the same thing as suggesting one is in any way liable for that. I didn't say they were liable. The content exists, the content got out. There's nothing more to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizenberg Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 The content exists, the content got out. There's nothing more to it. exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ϲharlie Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 haven't looked, don't intend to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyWalk Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 (edited) nudes don't really do anything for me tbh, i mean, i'll always appreciate a good body no matter what but it's still a bunch of pixels as for the subject of who's to blame, it's always a double edged sword, but i'll stand by it being more the hackers fault than anything. naked bodies really aren't that big of a deal once people are over 18 anyway. Edited September 1, 2014 by Alb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esme Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 unless the nudes belong to chris pratt I do not care Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Esau of Isaac Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 Okay, how could one's conscience possible allow someone to go after those images? It's bad enough that the privacy of these people has been violated, but there is no need to turn yourself into an accomplice of the act too. Accomplice? Get out of here. You are no more an accomplice to the act of invasion of privacy by finding these images than you are an accomplice to murder by watching an ISIS execution video. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 If you exist on this earth you are at risk of someone harming you might as well just stop existing amirite seriously I second CR's post this is a serious violation of privacy I'm honestly disgusted If you want naked pics of people go find some free porn or something don't look at stuff that people did not consent to be distributed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.