FFTF member archetypes: 2016 edition, revised and cleaner

[Elyn]

Could i classify as historyboo? historicaboo? Or something that means 'a unhealthy obsession with history'

: o

[Makaze]

It's perfect

[Chen]

Could i classify as historyboo? historicaboo? Or something that means 'a unhealthy obsession with history'

: o

liking history is pretty normal

[Person123]

Is there a category for no life do-nothings such as myself?

[Chen]

Is there a category for no life do-nothings such as myself?

yeah that's pretty normal

[Person123]

but..but I'm a special snowflake

[Original Alear]

Is there a category for no life do-nothings such as myself?

You need an archetype for ppl with great avatars.

EDIT-Oh that's normal because normals have avatars from FE and Berserk and stuff.

Edited February 6, 2016 by Sane Young Dog Man

[Chen]

but..but I'm a special snowflake

hey, there were a ton of you running around in the eimm

therefore, not special!

[Person123]

hey, there were a ton of you running around in the eimm

therefore, not special!

I don't think there were enough of me tbh. I died too early to flood the alias list rip

[Person123]

You need an archetype for ppl with great avatars.

ayy, thanks.

[Chen]

normals have pretty great avatars

[Original Alear]

normals have pretty great avatars

I said that in my edit hahhahaaa

[Chen]

shit

[Monde]

ah yes, finally a category for me

ah yes, the kpopists

[Parrhesia]

I don't hate weebshit and anime, but everything else applies decently well, I believe.

EDIT: Hmm, the more I see it, 'experienced ;)' doesn't fit me either since I'm not a dick.

The traits of the Experienced archetype are, in simplified terms;

- Age. Not immutable, given the use of the word 'often', but out of high school and often into university suggests at least 19 or 20. Judging by your profile, you are 18.

- Refined music tastes; I don't know your music tastes.

- Dislikes anime. You've conceded that you don't fit this.

- Outspoken dislike of stupidity. This isn't a trait I've particularly noticed with you - in fact, mostly you've been on the receiving end.

Having placed yourself in this group despite, at most, 1 (unproven) out of the 4 criteria, you say that you, in fact, are not because you aren't 'a dick' (ZM, 2016) implies that the sticking point of the matter was that you regard one or more of the prerequisites as immoral. Presumably, we can discount age from that, and since you aren't Tipper Gore, we can probably discount music tastes from that as well (especially as this is the only criterion you could possibly fit). A dislike of cartoons is, again, a matter of taste. I could perhaps see the dislike of people who take their love of cartoons to a level deemed excessive by society at large as a point of principle, but I don't think it holds up, either. Which leaves only the last point, the tendency to lash out at stupidity. It's true that this can be an unattractive tendency when taken to extremes, such as writing a faux-academic response to one badly-thought out statement from a day and a half ago, but is it really 'dickish'? I, for one, feel as though it is the natural way of a forum for the strong to assert their dominance over the weak. The question is, why did you once associate yourself with this trait? Does it speak of some primal self-loathing, some introspective Madonna/whore complex (or, should we instead say, an 'anime/troll' complex)? Do you aspire to become that which you despise?

The conclusion we can draw from this is that you should think before you speak.

1. M, Z. (2016). FFTF member archetypes: 2016 edition, revised and cleaner. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=60329

[Shin]

but..but I'm a special snowflake

If all snowflakes are unique, does that really make them all special? I believe an ordinary snowflake would be more unusual!

[ZemZem]

The traits of the Experienced archetype are, in simplified terms;

- Age. Not immutable, given the use of the word 'often', but out of high school and often into university suggests at least 19 or 20. Judging by your profile, you are 18.

- Refined music tastes; I don't know your music tastes.

- Dislikes anime. You've conceded that you don't fit this.

- Outspoken dislike of stupidity. This isn't a trait I've particularly noticed with you - in fact, mostly you've been on the receiving end.

Having placed yourself in this group despite, at most, 1 (unproven) out of the 4 criteria, you say that you, in fact, are not because you aren't 'a dick' (ZM, 2016) implies that the sticking point of the matter was that you regard one or more of the prerequisites as immoral. Presumably, we can discount age from that, and since you aren't Tipper Gore, we can probably discount music tastes from that as well (especially as this is the only criterion you could possibly fit). A dislike of cartoons is, again, a matter of taste. I could perhaps see the dislike of people who take their love of cartoons to a level deemed excessive by society at large as a point of principle, but I don't think it holds up, either. Which leaves only the last point, the tendency to lash out at stupidity. It's true that this can be an unattractive tendency when taken to extremes, such as writing a faux-academic response to one badly-thought out statement from a day and a half ago, but is it really 'dickish'? I, for one, feel as though it is the natural way of a forum for the strong to assert their dominance over the weak. The question is, why did you once associate yourself with this trait? Does it speak of some primal self-loathing, some introspective Madonna/whore complex (or, should we instead say, an 'anime/troll' complex)? Do you aspire to become that which you despise?

The conclusion we can draw from this is that you should think before you speak.

1. M, Z. (2016). FFTF member archetypes: 2016 edition, revised and cleaner. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=60329

...Yeah, you're right.

Edited February 7, 2016 by ZM.

[Makaze]

The traits of the Experienced archetype are, in simplified terms;

- Age. Not immutable, given the use of the word 'often', but out of high school and often into university suggests at least 19 or 20. Judging by your profile, you are 18.

- Refined music tastes; I don't know your music tastes.

- Dislikes anime. You've conceded that you don't fit this.

- Outspoken dislike of stupidity. This isn't a trait I've particularly noticed with you - in fact, mostly you've been on the receiving end.

Having placed yourself in this group despite, at most, 1 (unproven) out of the 4 criteria, you say that you, in fact, are not because you aren't 'a dick' (ZM, 2016) implies that the sticking point of the matter was that you regard one or more of the prerequisites as immoral. Presumably, we can discount age from that, and since you aren't Tipper Gore, we can probably discount music tastes from that as well (especially as this is the only criterion you could possibly fit). A dislike of cartoons is, again, a matter of taste. I could perhaps see the dislike of people who take their love of cartoons to a level deemed excessive by society at large as a point of principle, but I don't think it holds up, either. Which leaves only the last point, the tendency to lash out at stupidity. It's true that this can be an unattractive tendency when taken to extremes, such as writing a faux-academic response to one badly-thought out statement from a day and a half ago, but is it really 'dickish'? I, for one, feel as though it is the natural way of a forum for the strong to assert their dominance over the weak. The question is, why did you once associate yourself with this trait? Does it speak of some primal self-loathing, some introspective Madonna/whore complex (or, should we instead say, an 'anime/troll' complex)? Do you aspire to become that which you despise?

The conclusion we can draw from this is that you should think before you speak.

1. M, Z. (2016). FFTF member archetypes: 2016 edition, revised and cleaner. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=60329

Application denied.

[maybe]

If all snowflakes are unique, does that really make them all special? I believe an ordinary snowflake would be more unusual!

but if all snowflakes are unique... what is an ordinary snowflake?

[Chen]

maybe it's a special snowflake that looks boring?

also lmao that was fucking gold parrhesia

Edited February 7, 2016 by Chen

[peener weener]

The traits of the Experienced archetype are, in simplified terms;

- Age. Not immutable, given the use of the word 'often', but out of high school and often into university suggests at least 19 or 20. Judging by your profile, you are 18.

- Refined music tastes; I don't know your music tastes.

- Dislikes anime. You've conceded that you don't fit this.

- Outspoken dislike of stupidity. This isn't a trait I've particularly noticed with you - in fact, mostly you've been on the receiving end.

Having placed yourself in this group despite, at most, 1 (unproven) out of the 4 criteria, you say that you, in fact, are not because you aren't 'a dick' (ZM, 2016) implies that the sticking point of the matter was that you regard one or more of the prerequisites as immoral. Presumably, we can discount age from that, and since you aren't Tipper Gore, we can probably discount music tastes from that as well (especially as this is the only criterion you could possibly fit). A dislike of cartoons is, again, a matter of taste. I could perhaps see the dislike of people who take their love of cartoons to a level deemed excessive by society at large as a point of principle, but I don't think it holds up, either. Which leaves only the last point, the tendency to lash out at stupidity. It's true that this can be an unattractive tendency when taken to extremes, such as writing a faux-academic response to one badly-thought out statement from a day and a half ago, but is it really 'dickish'? I, for one, feel as though it is the natural way of a forum for the strong to assert their dominance over the weak. The question is, why did you once associate yourself with this trait? Does it speak of some primal self-loathing, some introspective Madonna/whore complex (or, should we instead say, an 'anime/troll' complex)? Do you aspire to become that which you despise?

The conclusion we can draw from this is that you should think before you speak.

1. M, Z. (2016). FFTF member archetypes: 2016 edition, revised and cleaner. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=60329

i keep re-reading this post i love it

[Elieson]

The traits of the Experienced archetype are, in simplified terms;

- Age. Not immutable, given the use of the word 'often', but out of high school and often into university suggests at least 19 or 20. Judging by your profile, you are 18.

- Refined music tastes; I don't know your music tastes.

- Dislikes anime. You've conceded that you don't fit this.

- Outspoken dislike of stupidity. This isn't a trait I've particularly noticed with you - in fact, mostly you've been on the receiving end.

Having placed yourself in this group despite, at most, 1 (unproven) out of the 4 criteria, you say that you, in fact, are not because you aren't 'a dick' (ZM, 2016) implies that the sticking point of the matter was that you regard one or more of the prerequisites as immoral. Presumably, we can discount age from that, and since you aren't Tipper Gore, we can probably discount music tastes from that as well (especially as this is the only criterion you could possibly fit). A dislike of cartoons is, again, a matter of taste. I could perhaps see the dislike of people who take their love of cartoons to a level deemed excessive by society at large as a point of principle, but I don't think it holds up, either. Which leaves only the last point, the tendency to lash out at stupidity. It's true that this can be an unattractive tendency when taken to extremes, such as writing a faux-academic response to one badly-thought out statement from a day and a half ago, but is it really 'dickish'? I, for one, feel as though it is the natural way of a forum for the strong to assert their dominance over the weak. The question is, why did you once associate yourself with this trait? Does it speak of some primal self-loathing, some introspective Madonna/whore complex (or, should we instead say, an 'anime/troll' complex)? Do you aspire to become that which you despise?

The conclusion we can draw from this is that you should think before you speak.

1. M, Z. (2016). FFTF member archetypes: 2016 edition, revised and cleaner. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=60329

But the real loser here is Parrhesia for putting more than 0 effort into this thread

[Ansem]

The traits of the Experienced archetype are, in simplified terms;

- Age. Not immutable, given the use of the word 'often', but out of high school and often into university suggests at least 19 or 20. Judging by your profile, you are 18.

- Refined music tastes; I don't know your music tastes.

- Dislikes anime. You've conceded that you don't fit this.

- Outspoken dislike of stupidity. This isn't a trait I've particularly noticed with you - in fact, mostly you've been on the receiving end.

Having placed yourself in this group despite, at most, 1 (unproven) out of the 4 criteria, you say that you, in fact, are not because you aren't 'a dick' (ZM, 2016) implies that the sticking point of the matter was that you regard one or more of the prerequisites as immoral. Presumably, we can discount age from that, and since you aren't Tipper Gore, we can probably discount music tastes from that as well (especially as this is the only criterion you could possibly fit). A dislike of cartoons is, again, a matter of taste. I could perhaps see the dislike of people who take their love of cartoons to a level deemed excessive by society at large as a point of principle, but I don't think it holds up, either. Which leaves only the last point, the tendency to lash out at stupidity. It's true that this can be an unattractive tendency when taken to extremes, such as writing a faux-academic response to one badly-thought out statement from a day and a half ago, but is it really 'dickish'? I, for one, feel as though it is the natural way of a forum for the strong to assert their dominance over the weak. The question is, why did you once associate yourself with this trait? Does it speak of some primal self-loathing, some introspective Madonna/whore complex (or, should we instead say, an 'anime/troll' complex)? Do you aspire to become that which you despise?

The conclusion we can draw from this is that you should think before you speak.

1. M, Z. (2016). FFTF member archetypes: 2016 edition, revised and cleaner. Retrieved February 7, 2016, from http://serenesforest.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=60329

yo damn i love you

you did the effort post so i didnt have to

[eclipse]

There's a time when one feels they have to show their strength. . .and then there's a time beyond that, when one knows their strength, and thus doesn't have to assert it unless they encounter someone who's so very self-unaware and wrong that they lash out and hurt others due to their extraordinary lack of self-awareness and intellectual honesty (which happens far too often for my tastes outside of this lovely board). Hobbies are whatever is fun, appealing, and non-malicious (in other words, swatting people isn't a hobby, and neither is looking up kiddy porn), and the rest of the world can take it or leave it. Labels slowly lose meaning.

In other words, what the fuck did I just post?

[Chen]

There's a time when one feels they have to show their strength. . .and then there's a time beyond that, when one knows their strength, and thus doesn't have to assert it unless they encounter someone who's so very self-unaware and wrong that they lash out and hurt others due to their extraordinary lack of self-awareness and intellectual honesty (which happens far too often for my tastes outside of this lovely board). Hobbies are whatever is fun, appealing, and non-malicious (in other words, swatting people isn't a hobby, and neither is looking up kiddy porn), and the rest of the world can take it or leave it. Labels slowly lose meaning.

In other words, what the fuck did I just post?

dude, now we need an anti-label thread