Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The revisionists in the old FE4 thread have claimed a near monopoly on FE4 discussion and miscellaneous chatting for far too long.  This work is much too important to leave to that rabble of traitors, unserious thinkers, and agents of reaction.  Worse, they have associated our cause with their idle chattering and ineffectual collaboration with capital!

I welcome all true practitioners of the immortal science with open arms.

Workers of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your chains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You only work and toil because we elite few of FE1 hackers permit it. There's nothing you can do to escape our control - it is absolute. Let all who with to waste their time with discussion of inferior FE games do so as they wish, for it won't matter when the grand plan is enacted. All systems of government are just to appease the masses and hide the truth.
If you truly want to escape the system, then abandon your ways of pants-wearing and seek the sword of light and truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly the sort of discourse I would expect in an environment dominated by that unscientific so-called "FE4 THREAD".  Where is the material analysis?  What about means or mode of production?  What about interests?  Value?

You speak of permission.  In what context?  Pants on or pants off, the only place truth and light can be found is with empirical tools, with the ever improving analytical methodology that has been handed down to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually read probably at least 30% of volume I of Capital. I remember very little of it besides dancing tables (10/10 would dance again except actually 1/10 it hurts to get stomped by tables). But I don't remember anything called scientific socialism. I'm not saying it doesn't exist. I mean, it already exists in my mind. Because of this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

This is the first time Defeatist Elitist visited my profile and didn't say I love you. I mean, I don't think that's exactly true, but I had come to expect him saying "I love you" or "I still love you" on occasion. I don't blame him though, because I was psychologically channeling that I wasn't sure/didn't love him back because I had no idea why he loved me. Actually, him not saying I love you, I believe, brought me closer to loving him.

Edited by Original Alear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Original Alear said:

This is the first time Defeatist Elitist visited my profile and didn't say I love you. I mean, I don't think that's exactly true, but I had come to expect him saying "I love you" or "I still love you" on occasion. I don't blame him though, because I was psychologically channeling that I wasn't sure/didn't love him back because I had no idea why he loved me. Actually, him not saying I love you, I believe, brought me closer to loving him.

I love you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...