Jump to content

Korath88

Member
  • Posts

    2,070
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Korath88

  1. 11 minutes ago, Landmaster said:

    I'm glad we had this empowering diqussion and came together to agree on Summer Lon'qu and Keaton 2K19~

    Speaking of Forging Bonds, I hope we get good accessories. I only used Celica's and Veronica's from last time and I can never be assed to play enough to get the EX ones. So many of my babies need some goodies~

    Not liking the helmets? Blasphemy.

    Spoiler

    We're getting a maid's headband, Knight's visor, thick rimmed glasses and a star hairpin for the next forging bonds

     

  2. Orb stashes? The last time I saved orbs was in late January for the SS banner. I went into CYL2 with barely any orbs and had to scavenge from quests and events. Getting the units I wanted was nothing short of a miracle.

  3. Since I'm satisfied with my CYL haul, I'm just spending orbs on a whim now.

    Yolo'd an off focus Grima (forgot to check nature before foddering) on the fury banner yesterday, and a full circle roll on the same banner today just got me an off focus Sigurd (+Spd -Atk, same as my current one) and Nephenee (+Res -Def)

    okay then

  4. Character and unit wise, I really don't care about any of them, with conquest still having my least liked cast in all of FE, but in terms of fodder, Silas being the obvious demote is definitely what I'm most excited about. More reposition fodder and 4* accessible steady stance and def wave? Hell yeah.

    As for now I'll patiently wait with my orbs for Atk/Spd solo to be introduced.

  5. 6 minutes ago, Ice Dragon said:

    I'm under the impression that the Emblem Tier lists are not "how units of the movement type compare to each other", but are supposed to be "how units of the movement type would place on the normal tier list if they had full movement-type buffs".

    In which case, all armors are S+ relative to the normal tier list when fully buffed.

     

    Which is why I said it follows the criteria, but because of that, is completely useless to anyone trying to build an armor team. Sometimes it would be better to change a few definitions so as to better account for the slight differences in performance of armors.

    Regarding the other point, rating PP oriented mages on EP builds still isn't a fair way to rate units. And considering that gamepedia is the only tier list to do so, I don't see any reason to back this change.

  6. 8 minutes ago, DehNutCase said:

    I mean, I rather enjoyed how they said 'tiering is about how good a unit is at doing their jobs' and then went and pretended 'all armors are equally good at doing an armor's job.'

     

    @Korath88 The main problem I have with armors, melee armors in particular, is that they don't have real ways to deal with their checks out than just straight up out-scoring them. Dazzle Staffs with strong debuffs isn't something melee armors have tools to solve (ranged armors don't give a damn, though, Bow Jakob can just put on his armored boots and shoot the staff to death).

    This is a lot more visible in PvE content where their lack of tools means that it's pretty damn rare that an armor is the best pick, but low scoring area (where a new player tends to be---and new players need good tier lists the most) also tends to have more of an armor's natural checks.

    But how many healers is an armor team going to encounter at their score range anyways? Especially since the most commonly recommended ones are cavalry healers who have lower BST. I think the most I saw was one Veronica every 10 matches or so. While definitely a threat, it's not one so common that all melee armors should be dropped several tiers.

    Same can be said for the dumb decision to rank mages for EP. Are those specific omnibreaker/wary builds so common that the criteria for mages has to be completely overhauled? Because I'm pretty sure forcing a PP mage to run a niche EP build is only going to kill every other matchup they have just to counter one threat, that should arguably be another unit's job to kill. And if team synergy isn't taken into account, then why is Odin assumed to have +6/6/6/6?

  7. Tier list still looks like a pile of crap to me, but to be fair, I don't give a shit about some of the supposed new "meta" builds *cough* CC mages *cough*

    not to mention how pointless the armor emblem buff list is, since despite following the criteria, completely undermines the point of an emblem specific list.

    Though I don't see as much of a problem with armors at the top of the lists as others, especially after running armor emblem for the past 2 weeks of arena. Positioning with armors isn't really as awful as people make it out to be. The only maps they tend to struggle on are flier biased maps like the lava one, but pretty much any grounded melee unit struggles on that.

  8. 2 hours ago, Diovani Bressan said:

    I believe the only way Ephraim to win this VG is to get multipliers in the last 2 hours. I mean, right now is 27 billion Vs 21 billion. Veronica got a lot from this last multiplier, and I believe Ephraim will took 2 multipliers to reach her.

    Not necessarily. Another possible situation is ending up in same on the second last hour and Veronica barely pushing Ephraim into the 7.5 for the last hour.

    I don't think there's any other possible winning situation outside of these 2, though my past experiences with upsets has shown that this isn't exactly a rare occurrence 

×
×
  • Create New...