A thing is a thing, you are arguing a tautology. That thing only has value if it offers some kind of reward. Serious discussion without resolution is serious discussion. I never disputed that.
But it's worthless.
The point of serious discussion is resolution. Without achieving the end goal, there is no point. It is a waste of time unless you get off on telling other people they are wrong ad infinitum.
What does my belief have to do with whether they get resolved or not? People want arguments to get resolved whether that is a realistic expectation or not.
In seriousness (haha) I don't think that is the issue. They do not like the types of people that thrive there on argument itself, who seek no resolution and only argue because it's fun.