Frosty Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 Blech... Only a friggin 1... If this was 0 to 10, I'd give myself a 0.5 or 0. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleph Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 haha, if you're a 1 that puts most of you guys in the negative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peener weener Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 haha, if you're a 1 that puts most of you guys in the negative. haha that's including yourself right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleph Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 1010 is positive like how was that not obvious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peener weener Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) 1010 is positive like how was that not obvious well, completely ignoring your previous statement obviously Edited August 27, 2011 by Barioth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) Six and a half. Oh I'm so humble Despite acting like I'm the greatest thing to ever walk on the earth (I do it more IRL than online) I can much more easily find flaws with myself than good things. However, I am fond of myself and if I got the opportunity to drastically change myself, I wouldn't. Edited August 27, 2011 by Darros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) Out of curiosity, why isn't this a public poll with the numbers 1 to 10? oh, and 11, obviously Edited August 27, 2011 by Narga_Rocks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 (edited) Because pi and e wouldn't be included unless OP somehow wants it there. I should just go for pi x e/10. It'd be written as pie and I'd eat it. It's also a higher rating. Edited August 27, 2011 by Luminescent Kitty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frosty Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I'd be posting a wall of text if I had to state my reasons to rate myself at a meager or abysmal score of 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I'd be posting a WALL OF DICKS if I had to state my reasons to rate myself at a meagre or abysmal score of 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riariadne Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 rating oneself is overrated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rothene Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 [(1x(2^3))-4+5-6+7-8+9]/2 out of 10 I'd not go out of my way to stab you, but I'd also not lift a finger to help you if doing so would bring unavoidable harm to me. That justifies as TRUE NEUTRAL alignment! Wait something feels wrong...gah, whatever... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanarkin Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 I got 5.5 out of that whole equation. Now the question is... did i do my bedmas/Pemdas right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleph Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Speaking realistically nobody here is a above a 1, and 0.0000001 is like super great etc. Unless 10 represents at least the best person there is in existence, there will be people who are better, and since you didn't specify I thought 10 meant "absolute best" instead of "relative best" (how uncouth if you intended for it to be the highest rating we could give while simultaneously intending for there to be people who should be rated higher). If you meant the latter then my apologies, but only one person would be a 10 then even so. me All that said 1-10 is too limiting, though we can't get much more specific without being familiar with every single person. If you want a more realistic rating from me then I would say the number of 0s between the radix point and the non zero digits thereafter would take more than a lifetime to enumerate (visual reference: .0~1, in which ~ means "a fuckton of 0s") and yet I would still consider it a higher rating than what any of you would get (except maybe Severian), or in the case of "relative best" I'd give myself an 8. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Shouldn't we just say that 10 is the best person on this board? Also round to the nearest 1 for simplicity, so no decimals, even though a 6.4 would obviously be better than a 5.6 yet both become 6. If you are an 8 on that scale (I would think that would be relative best on this board type of scaling, what I said) then who are the 9s and 10s? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anouleth Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 If you are an 8 on that scale (I would think that would be relative best on this board type of scaling, what I said) then who are the 9s and 10s? All me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Oh, so we are using a reverse scale. Gotcha. I'd have thought Obviam would rate himself better than an 8, then. Like a 3 or 4. And I'll be a 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anouleth Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Oh, so we are using a reverse scale. Hi people! I was curious, if you could rate yourself as a person from a scale of 1-10, with 1 being the lowest and 10 being the highest, what would you give yourself, and perhaps why? Do you think you're great, or terrible? Narga gets a 1 for reading comprehension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narga_Rocks Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Narga gets a 1 for reading comprehension. I was trying to suggest you were changing the scheme all on your own. You get a 1 for reading between the lines ability. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted August 27, 2011 Share Posted August 27, 2011 Since me being a 1 and a 10 has been acknowledged handily and not challenged, I now know that I am, indeed, god of the forest, and Life AKA God of Serenes AKA whatever he is now, must in actuality be the devil. And I forgive him, and welcome him back into heaven into a position equal to mine, knowing full well I can cast him down when necessary despite his equality with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lux Aeterna Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 [(1x(2^3))-4+5-6+7-8+9]/2 out of 10 I'd not go out of my way to stab you, but I'd also not lift a finger to help you if doing so would bring unavoidable harm to me. That justifies as TRUE NEUTRAL alignment! Wait something feels wrong...gah, whatever... 5.5 out of ten? Why not say that? I thought true neutral would earn a perfectly balan-- Oh, I see. 1 to 10, the middle of 1 and 10 is 5.5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleph Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 (edited) Oh, so we are using a reverse scale. Gotcha. I'd have thought Obviam would rate himself better than an 8, then. Like a 3 or 4. And I'll be a 4. You basically just confirmed that you had read and possibly even understood my post which indicated that I was rating myself well, and then you go and assume that I was doing the opposite. No, I would not give myself an 8 using your scale and definitely not using a reversed scale. I would give myself at least a 10, probably higher depending on what the criteria for being associated with this board are. You get a 1 for confusing yourself and picking on Bronouleth, who is easily a 9.99. Edited August 28, 2011 by Obviam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Sage Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 I award myself a 4. I do know I have plenty of faults as a human being. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 [(1x(2^3))-4+5-6+7-8+9]/2 out of 10 Googling the equation brought up a Wikipedia page for a car! Speaking realistically nobody here is a above a 1, and 0.0000001 is like super great etc. Unless 10 represents at least the best person there is in existence, there will be people who are better, and since you didn't specify I thought 10 meant "absolute best" instead of "relative best" (how uncouth if you intended for it to be the highest rating we could give while simultaneously intending for there to be people who should be rated higher). If you meant the latter then my apologies, but only one person would be a 10 then even so. me All that said 1-10 is too limiting, though we can't get much more specific without being familiar with every single person. If you want a more realistic rating from me then I would say the number of 0s between the radix point and the non zero digits thereafter would take more than a lifetime to enumerate (visual reference: .0~1, in which ~ means "a fuckton of 0s") and yet I would still consider it a higher rating than what any of you would get (except maybe Severian), or in the case of "relative best" I'd give myself an 8. Don't overthink things like this, that's really dumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Galenforcer Posted August 28, 2011 Share Posted August 28, 2011 2. Nobody really likes me that much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.