The_Purple_Knight Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 What type of classes do you want to see in this game ? The same old same old myrmidons ,paladins etc or some exciting new classes ? I personally would prefer alot more variety in magic units radiant dawn /por really disappointed me in that regarde,not even any Mage knights . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rothene Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 PLAYABLE BARON! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Light Lord Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 New units would gladly be welcomed, but I can't think of something to expect at all. As long as a few of them get better caps or new weapon possibilities that would be could. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stark Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 (edited) Master Knights. Have at me, balance lovers. I'd love to see barons and queens playable as well. /wistful thinking/ Honestly odds are against seeing much, besides maybe a light mage ala RD. That would actually be pretty cool. Edited November 30, 2011 by Overlord Zetta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Replica Model Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I would like to see all the classes from Gaiden in there. Yes even the "Slayer" class, and the playable Baron(I prefer the name Baron over Marshall). Even though they replaced it with the Swordmaster. I also wonder if the bows are going to have a great of range like in Gaiden. . . What? These are just thoughts. . . . You can get a Baron in Gaiden you know. You just need the patience to train a Armor Knight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celice Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I want to see more playable dragons. Not mamkutes, but actual dragons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewjeo Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 Mounted mages. Male pegasus riders. If it can be implemented well, classes that use both weapons and magic. Maybe new weapon combinations, or more customizable, i.e. FE9's promotion choices. Make each class actually worthwhile. A lot of the time, Hero>SM, although cases with specific characters go against that, and it would be nice if SMs had an advantage to make up for no 1-2 range and no WTC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epic Fail Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 How about a customisable class (obviously you'd have to use a pre-existing sprite/battle animation/etc)? Like MU, only it gives you total freedom (well, more anyway, not that I think the FE12 MU system was in any way restrictive). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rothene Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 When I mentioned barons...I was thinking of armoured mages... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Purple_Knight Posted November 30, 2011 Author Share Posted November 30, 2011 PLAYABLE BARON! Hell yeah maybe a pre armor class that specializes in magic that could class into one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawman Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I am still a proponent of heavily armored, high defense magic units. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Purple_Knight Posted November 30, 2011 Author Share Posted November 30, 2011 I am still a proponent of heavily armored, high defense magic units. Even with crappy res ,and speed they can still only take on physically units in that case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethereal Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 (edited) More desirable magic users. Flying mages, mounted shamans, not having crappy move/being replaced easily by hand axes/javelins. Anything to make the casters more interesting and balanced. Edited November 30, 2011 by Aethereal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwdYeti Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 Magic tier 2s that don't have staves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewjeo Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 On the topic of magic, maybe try and balance out the different kinds? Like maybe have some classes follow the whole one magic type+staves style, but then maybe have one that uses multiple types of magic and have it be worth using the new one(s). Maybe do what FE9 did with Paladins and let you choose what new magic/staves your sage gets? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrashGordon94 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I want male versions of female-only classes and vice versa. Also, I'd like mounted healers to be taken out because they cripple game balance by totally outclassing normal Bishops in the eyes of efficiency drones and even many casual or ordinary players. Mounted mages are an excellent idea though, they should get magic and Swords just like in FE4/5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cysx Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 Ninjas!! Or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Refa Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 Male pegasus riders. NO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive Account Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 NO whyever not? Also nthing mage knights, those were fun when they existed. Would add the corollary "that don't suck" to any suggestion of a unit of a given gender whose class usually only contains the opposite gender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 (edited) NO You realise that in Greek mythology, the first pegasus rider was a dude? It makes no sense to make Pegriders female only. Edited November 30, 2011 by Luminescent Blade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bottlegnomes Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 You realise that in Greek mythology, the first pegasus rider was a dude? It makes no sense to make Pegriders female only. It kinda does in the context of the story, because Pegasus became afraid of humans afterwards and women are generally considered gentler so pegasi would be more willing to trust them. That said, it is stupid that there are no male pegasus knights. A badass female hero, like Echidna, and good assassins, along with the male pegasus knights. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anouleth Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 This thread is for discussing classes, not what genitalia you want those classes to have, or how good you want those classes to be. I just want the usual back. Paladins and Falcoknights. They can have penises or vaginas or a mass of writhing tentacles at their crotch, I don't care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethereal Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Also, I'd like mounted healers to be taken out because they cripple game balance by totally outclassing normal Bishops in the eyes of efficiency drones and even many casual or ordinary players. This is only a problem in that Bishops are a bad class, not that troubadours/valks are too good. Bishops generally have really low movement, overkill resistance, and a weak weapon type. Making it worse, a lot of bishops promote from staff-locked tier 1 classes, so will be behind in level, and have bad weapon ranks. This isn't always true, but the exceptions to the rule are generally not bad units. They can have penises or vaginas or a mass of writhing tentacles at their crotch, I don't care. I feel this would make all the mounts uncomfortable. And me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bottlegnomes Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 This thread is for discussing classes, not what genitalia you want those classes to have, or how good you want those classes to be. I just want the usual back. Paladins and Falcoknights. They can have penises or vaginas or a mass of writhing tentacles at their crotch, I don't care. I did say I wanted assassins. It just happened to be between two gender specified classes. Anyway, not sure what they'd be called, but a sword using unit that focuses on strength instead of skill, so basically a berserker with swords, and an axe using class that's the opposite, like a SM with axes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inactive Account Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 I could see strength-focused sword units, but skill-focused axe units strike me as a little weird (the whole point of axes being they are big and unwieldy and heavy enough to really hurt if they do hit). Not that it technically has to make sense, I suppose... and I'm sufficiently out of touch with FE that I can't really comment on what it would or wouldn't do for game balance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.