Jump to content

Most polarising or divisive characters


lenticular
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is inspired by the Camilla thread. It's no surprise to anyone who's spent more than 3 seconds around the fandom that Camilla is a divisive character. She is undeniably popular, but she is also undeniably widely hated. So I was thinking, which other Fire Emblem characters fit that same pattern? Who else do you fear to even mention in case it derails the conversation and turns into a flame war? I'm thinking that Edelgard and Rhea fall into the same category, as do all avatar characters. I'm sure I'm missing some, though. Who else is there? Who's the most polarising character from each game?

(Note: this is not the thread for talking about why these characters are the best/the worst, and is definitely not the thread for talking about how the people who hate them/love them are objectively terrible people. This is the thread for acknowledging that some characters are simultaneously both popular and unpopular and it's right and good that different people are able to have different opinions. Be respectful!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Micaiah's character might have been in the past as well (), but I wouldn't have been there in RD's heyday. I've seen a fair few dislike RD!Ike's prominence in said game but don't know for sure if that's sufficient to be counted here.

I'd also second the other avatars as well, moreso Corrin and Byleth considering their popularity in the fandom while others take issue with them (It's me, I'm one of those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Corrin themselves would count as divisive. I'm sure they have their fans in regards to whether or not they like the character, but I think its mostly common agreement that they're not a well written main character. 

Edelgard, Dimitri and Rhea are good picks for divisive characters given the rather heated discussions about them. Edelgard in particular. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Armchair General said:

With Engage, it's Alear's character design, but that died out.

Nah. It's still the worst part of an otherwise phenomenal game.

 

Anyway liking or disliking Rhea, Edelgard, Dimitri and (which version of) Claude is basically a political alignment test. Hilda, Bernadetta, and Sylvain are also pretty divisive. 

 

For other games, Corrin and Shinon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Punished Dayni said:

I feel like Micaiah's character might have been in the past as well (), but I wouldn't have been there in RD's heyday.

Oh, good call. I think she's probably still pretty divisive, but Radiant Dawn is sufficiently old and established that it's not likely to inspire hot takes and active flame wars any more.

3 hours ago, Scaramuccia said:

Engage is a bit too early to judge as the game itself is very polarizing, but I think Hortenzia and Goldmary have big polarizing potential.

I could easily see that being the case, yeah. Especially with Hortensia. I'm not a fan myself, but I can see why she might appeal to others.  She's very turned up to 11.

1 hour ago, Etrurian emperor said:

I don't think Corrin themselves would count as divisive. I'm sure they have their fans in regards to whether or not they like the character, but I think its mostly common agreement that they're not a well written main character. 

I mean, female Corrin did just win CYL recently, so she obviously has a pretty sizable fanbase.

19 minutes ago, Fabulously Olivier said:

For other games, Corrin and Shinon.

Really? Huh. Interesting. I don't think I've seen much in the way of disagreement about Shinon. The consensus that I normally tend to see is that he's a scumbag but that he's well written in that role. Are there other prevailing views on him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Fabulously Olivier said:

Anyway liking or disliking Rhea, Edelgard, Dimitri and (which version of) Claude is basically a political alignment test.

To most of those that's indeed the case but I think Edelgard's politics are a bit too divisive to be a trustworthy political alignment test. Rhea is very easily picked as a conservative, just as easily as Claude is an open border liberal. But opinions towards Edelgard's politics range from everything from her being far left, or a fascist. Lots of people support Edelgard for being progressive while others despise her for being a ''fascist''.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Etrurian emperor said:

To most of those that's indeed the case but I think Edelgard's politics are a bit too divisive to be a trustworthy political alignment test. Rhea is very easily picked as a conservative, just as easily as Claude is an open border liberal. But opinions towards Edelgard's politics range from everything from her being far left, or a fascist. Lots of people support Edelgard for being progressive while others despise her for being a ''fascist''.

Edelgard, Claude, Dimitri, and Rhea fall pretty cleanly into Authoritarian Left, Libertarian Left, Libertarian Right, and Authoritarian Right, and I'm not about to slam Edelgard for being fascist when Rhea is a theocratic fascist with a light dollop of Izuka.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is Makalov even popular enough to count?

otherwise yeah, i don't think there are many "camillla-tier" divisive FE characters aside from Edelgard, Rhea and a few more i've seen being mentioned

Edited by Yexin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say Rhea, Edelgard, Camilla, and Tharja top the list. For the former two, it's moreso due to the "dual role" each plays - sometimes a hero, other times a villain. For Tharja, it's a combination of design and personality. And for Camilla, both are true.

I do wonder if female characters are more likely to be controversial - or to be seen as controversial - than their male counterparts. Ideally, this wouldn't be the case, but I could see any number of factors potentially playing into this.

5 hours ago, Fabulously Olivier said:

Anyway liking or disliking Rhea, Edelgard, Dimitri and (which version of) Claude is basically a political alignment test. Hilda, Bernadetta, and Sylvain are also pretty divisive. 

Hilda is? I've not heard that one before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Shanty Pete's 1st Mate said:

Hilda is? I've not heard that one before.

Yes, she is. Underneath the cute pink haired girl exterior, she's still an unintentionally racist character from a slave owning family, who doesn't really even develop into seeing how screwed up the latter is. She's basically a modern Claire (who was unintentionally and humerously classist). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Etrurian emperor said:

I mean....isn't he more universally despised rather than polarizing? Seems everyone is pretty much in agreement about him.

i mean yeah, he kinda is
for a moment i forgot the topic was "divisive" characters and just thought about controversial ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ike ought to be perhaps a little more divisive than he is. Not hugely so but at least a little bit. Ike's known as a pretty open minded guy which isn't entirely the case. Ike's definitely not a racist. But he's certainly a classist. A classist against the upper class rather than the lower, but a classist all the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Etrurian emperor said:

I think Ike ought to be perhaps a little more divisive than he is. Not hugely so but at least a little bit. Ike's known as a pretty open minded guy which isn't entirely the case. Ike's definitely not a racist. But he's certainly a classist. A classist against the upper class rather than the lower, but a classist all the same. 

Given what Tellius' upper class is like, can you even blame him?

 

Anyway, Ike is divisive specifically because a bunch of people weirdly think Nintendo wrote a homosexual protagonist all the way back in 2005, in the same game series that was still using gay stereotypes for humor. And then people get really angry on both sides of that non-issue for no good reason. I think we all know that if PoR/RD got a remake, Ike would officially join the franchise's growing list of bi characters, and people would briefly be toxic about it, before it eventually gets largely accepted as good for the franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fabulously Olivier said:

Given what Tellius' upper class is like, can you even blame him?

 

Anyway, Ike is divisive specifically because a bunch of people weirdly think Nintendo wrote a homosexual protagonist all the way back in 2005, in the same game series that was still using gay stereotypes for humor. And then people get really angry on both sides of that non-issue for no good reason. I think we all know that if PoR/RD got a remake, Ike would officially join the franchise's growing list of bi characters, and people would briefly be toxic about it, before it eventually gets largely accepted as good for the franchise.

Engage is already preparing us for that possibility; I didn't think I could see discussions about Ike's sexuality becoming something again in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to think of specifically male divisive characters, and while @Fabulously Olivier has mentioned Sylvain already, I'll add that most characters who fit into the general "womaniser/flirt/philanderer/lady's man" character archetype tend to be at least somewhat divisive. So Gatrie, Virion, etc. Not anywhere near the level of some of the other names in this thread, but it's there.

I'll also add joke characters as another broader category. Oliver is the one that's really coming to mind for me, but there are probably others too. With joke characters, the big bone of contention is always going to be whether the joke lands for you or not. If you find Oliver's schtick funny, then he's a fun comic relief character. If you don't find it funny then he's just an objectively terrible person who's getting the world's least earned redemption arc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Fabulously Olivier said:

Given what Tellius' upper class is like, can you even blame him?

I dunno. There's hardly much wrong with Bastian, Sigrun, Lucia, or Goffrey. Even the snobby Sanaki's much better than she appears to be. There's a scene midway through where they theorize the Begnion Senate is the true embodiment of nobility and that Elincia and Kurth are different only because she was raised in secret and he's a Laguz, but after meeting Sigrun and Elincia's retainers that line of thinking loses a lot of its ground, yet when RD rolls around Ike and co pretend as if they never met all those decent nobles. 

In Crimea its even a plot point that the upper class are vastly more open minded towards Laguz than the lower classes. The upper classes makes alliance with the laguz, the lower classes try to lynch them for the lulz. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Fabulously Olivier said:

Anyway liking or disliking Rhea, Edelgard, Dimitri and (which version of) Claude is basically a political alignment test.

Don't judge people on what characters/fiction they like, that's pure idiocy.

Fiction is fiction and reality is reality.

Not to mention context of the story matters alot as well, and how people view characters is different.

Edited by Shrimpy -Limited Edition-
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...