Vince777

I never miss on any content, always complete every single quest and yet I only have 4 units with maxed HMs, Reinhardt, Olivia, Brave Lyn & Xander. I don't have a single unit with 0 HMs though. Shigure has the smallest amount with 9 and that was enough to get him to Lv 40.

There's also the fact that Heroes OC units don't have many other units to compete with from their respective game. It's also the one FE game that all the FEH players have played. You click on the game on the CYL voting page and basically all the characters are there with no scrolling that has to be done to find a particular unit.

Not exactly a unit type, but I like to invest my orbs in Heroes OCs and characters from older games that you couldn't ever use yourself. The only one I'm missing is Mikoto and I'm currently just spending into colourless in the current banner in an attempt to get her as well.

Has there been a seasonal unit yet that's received a refinement? They might not be doing them.

Every new game mode has brought on new orbs along with them so it feels silly to me to complain about IS removing a few of them. They can't just give them like candy or it wouldn't work as a gacha game.

Loved that you asked based on appearance and personality rather than performance.

So I watched this trailer because the 3 starters are the one thing I wanted spoiled for myself so I can decide in advance but I will not watch a single trailer after that until release so I can discover the new pokémon as I play the game. I managed to do this much for the 6th and 7th generation and it made them so enjoyable.

Manaketes Tiki / Myrrh / Fae roughly need no investment as they crap over most things from the get-go.

My insane luck continues. Got the unit I wanted from the four golden orbs in Legendary Azura and then got my 7th free pull 5* in one month and a half with Female Morgan on the voting gauntlet banner. I'm really overdue for a months long drought now.

He's the legend's grandson and this is the sort of moral boost the nearly defeated rebellion needed at this point. Sort of like how Joan of Arc led troops because she was thought to have had visions so that's at least one instance in which something like that happened in real life. I still agree it is silly that he was appointed the actual leader and the game addresses that a bit with Fernand defecting. It seems Clive thought it a good idea after they've endured defeat after defeat and only started to win again after Alm had joined.

Most are too humble and empathetic to be actual priviledged nobles. They would normally be pretty conceited assholes. Generally the same sort of dick most villains in the series are portrayed as. I'd say Alm is the most realistic, since he would know nothing of that and wasn't raised in nobility. Perhaps Ike and Lyn as well.

Unless this handicaps me too much and cannot be done without, I plan to play without class changing so canon classes for the characters would be appreciated. It's just a feature I've always much disliked in Fire Emblem. It makes no sense to me that an archer would suddently try out riding a wyvern or that an axe wielding fighter would suddenly try his hand at a little magic. I don't know, it kind of messes with my immersion into the story.

She seems God-like in power. Largely more powerful than any unit in the game (super weakness to Binding Blade notwithstanding). She's a last boss, larger than life, and only compares to Grima if put on a banner. Grima probably would have made a Mythic Heroes banner as well, had they been there at the time. I don't think they literally need to be "gods" or be seen as gods (as even Duma isn't actually one). Even some legend like Athos I feel would belong on a Mythic hero banner. There aren't that many 'gods' in the series.

Aren't those weird names for Hoshido natives though? I think you should take look at the list of generic names the game does have for capturable units. Here's a partial list: Males: Jin Jinpei Kazuki Kenosha Masahiko Nobu Ren Saburo Takanori Tamaki Tomihiko Yamato Yohei Females: Asuka Kasumi Koromo Mikasa Momiji

Well he's riding the dragon so they'll make him another rider. He doesn't attack with it in the game he's in. Plus he's got his own sword, the Gurgurant and it would be kind of silly in my opinion to miss on that. Pretty much a lock as a sword flier. Tellius has many dragons of it's own to introduce anyway. :) I suppose the Soni/yas have traits they share and I like them both as characters a lot. Sonia has always intrigued me though. She's a morph, must be aware of it deep inside, but she's lied to herself enough that she doesn't consider herself one and looks at other morphs with contempt.

Murdock seems like the highest profile pick to me and he appears in both the Elibe games. That'd be my guess but I'd basically love just anyone amongst those proposed heroes (although would rather Idunn be kept for Mystic hero banner).

Sonia Petrine Limstella Raydrik Vaida Just overall very strong women, Thracia's primary antagonist (and Limstella, if we're to question it's gender). Raydrik would have his proof Loptyr Sword, Petrine her flame lance and hopefully they can give Vaida something that reflects how ridiculous her spear was in Blazing Sword.

No, that's the mistake. 'on' is a sound in itself and the 'n' is silent.

You could say basically the same thing about 90% of the units not yet in the game. At this point, most would join in unit types we already have a lot of. I’d rather Marcus makes the game in his Blazing Sword form though.

I really wish we’d get Anri at some point as a Mythic hero just to see what he’s like. Did he ever get Cipher art or something, at any point?

First of all, I certainly didn't say that sex was a requirement to be in a relationship or love someone, so chill. I also happen to define sex beyond only straight copulation. If you want close contact, if you want warmth, if you want to kiss, that is to me just as much a part of the deal. Second, I was always under the impression that being asexual meant having no desire for any intimate relationship at all for either gender so if I'm wrong about that, I apologize. That's assuming your definition of asexuality is indeed objectively what you just provided. Last, it appeared to me you were calling yourself that because you don't find a "bulge" on men to be attractive. I'm pretty sure that most women probably feel this way.

What does asexual mean to you? These sentences seem pretty contradictory to me.

I'm happy to see that most people seem to value personality over performance considering I'm pretty tired to be told I'm throwing myself down a "pitfall" if I happen to play Fire Emblem with a team that does not consist entirely of cavaliers and fliers. I certainly don't use Bastian because he is a world beater. I do so because he's just an awesome character with one of the most entertaining dialogues in the series.

FE2/FE15 is much a world in itself that's quite distinct from Archanea though so I would feel uncomfortable pairing them together in the same manner FE1&3, FE4&5, FE6&7 and FE9&10 go together. Even more uncomfortable adding Awakening to it. I'd put Gaiden/Echoes, Awakening and Sacred Stones amongst the outliers.

Gotcha. There seems to be at least one exception to that though: https://fireemblem.fandom.com/wiki/Omozu Poor guy. I would recruit anyone with it's own non-generic face if I could.