Jump to content

Lord Raven

Member
  • Posts

    9,206
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lord Raven

  1. Which pretty much nullifies the point of defense and HP in Lorenz's case.

    I was saying that as a Hero he wouldn't be too bad, though. He isn't doubling that often, though, but he's at least avoiding doubling from the majority of NM enemies.

  2. Ah i see

    Anyways how is Ike v. Bk disappointing?

    Hey, Ike can double the shit out of you and kill you in like three rounds! Take that!

    How can you find that epic? Especially since the AI is a crapshoot and attacks you when you're on a +10 defense tile.

    Yeah but IIRC Ike tells the BK that his Dad didn't use swords anymore. Besides in the first part Greil was using a wooden sword to train ike.
    Wooden sword or not, it's still a sword.

    What makes a big axe any different than a sword anyway?

  3. no clue, his base stats are actually fine (aside from speed) if you give him the Hero class, but his Speed tends to grow anyway (as a Hero)... but his defense REALLY suffers (his entire defense growth as a General is because of his class; he has 0% base defense growth!)

    so yeah, I should think before I post because I actually agree with bottom tier.

  4. What I am saying is that #2 is part of a character's usefulness, and is just one factor of an overall picture. It is also part of the gameplay, which is why I heavily disagree with ignoring it completely. This has absolutely nothing to do with bias (and I've stated repeatedly to penalize them both to prevent said bias).
    Well then, I'm actually starting to agree that a mutual penalty is about right.
  5. I'm aware that it's not changing much on the tier list, if at all. Yet you are still should be unable to assume things and get away with it. That's precisely what I'm trying to say. The entire idea behind everything I'm arguing is on the principle behind judging tiers.

    You keep crying double standard, but even when you apply fair judgement, the better units are still going to be higher on the tier list, and even with applying fair judgement, the choice between two characters that have a large gap in quality is going to cause a bigger tier list gap than two characters that don't. That's just how it is.
    The choice between two characters is/should be irrelevant, though.

    Better units higher on a tier list is precisely the point. I actually don't see what point you're trying to make here; it seems to be

    - Better characters will always be higher on a tier list

    - Choice between two characters will make someone else lower and someone else higher

    in which case, #1 is a given and #2 I disagree with. Not fully, since there is always bias and subjectivity.

    And really? To make tiers less complicated, there's always getting rid of the ordering within tiers. It'll cause less debate and allow us to be in a more full accordance with what the general tiers should be like.

  6. Surely the few black people that you know are the counter examples to black people being rude and obnoxious, no?

    Every race has its fair share of rude, obnoxious people. Not like it's the fact that they're black or white or yellow that's relevant - it's the personality that matters in the end.

  7. Zelgius is the Black Knight

    I'll be honest, someone's a bit slow on the uptaking. If you looked at his in-game data (on the site as well), you'd pretty much see the proof.

    Micaiah is the apostle

    I forget how, but I figured it out without reading any dialogue that was even relevant.
    Spirits can move anywhere on the map
    D:
  8. I loved 2-E, actually. I was just playing it and had to restart a couple times (due to experiments on top of anything, battle saves are a boon) - Haar with Hand Axe, Short Axe, a bunch of BEXP, a Hammer, and a speedwing RAPES the chapter. With support from a physic stuff. On normal mode.

    1-E was a burnout to me.

×
×
  • Create New...