Elieson Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Obligatory. I vote Yes. Edited June 13, 2012 by Elieson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ein Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 If he gets to be the Draft section mod I get to be the Forum Games section mod. It's only fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunwoo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 **waves flag that says, "Go Integrity!"** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZemZem Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I may not know Integ very well, but I agree that he should be the draft section mod. Voted yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciarre Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 YES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jedi Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 In the couple days I've been here now I do not have much of a say in regards to this, but after looking through alot of the drafts and that rule thread, Integrity clearly has the passion for the section so I say yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacLovin Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Yes, I support this. If ANYONE else gets to be the draft forums mod, there will be SFers with torches and pitchforks marching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Horace Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I hate to be a party pooper but Do we really need one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ciarre Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) herp derp Edited June 14, 2012 by Executioner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunwoo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Well, if we need one, that is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacLovin Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Well, then we need people to shut down those threads where people get butthurt. Like the RNG abuse one. I think INteg was mad in that Edited June 13, 2012 by Folgore Green Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerine Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Your prayers have been answered, noble denizens! Integrity is now section mod of the Pokemon sub-forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunwoo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 You're so great, Tangerine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZemZem Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Integrity is now section mod of the Pokemon sub-forum! Hey, at least he's a sectional mod! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacLovin Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Haha. Don't be trolling the man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerine Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Well, I was actually joking about that to tease you guys, but I'll think about the request for sure :P. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ein Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 What about the "Ein gets to be the Forum Games mod" clause Tangy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uguu Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 What about the "Ein gets to be the Forum Games mod" clause Tangy? well, that section certainly needs to be moderated a lot, but you're part of the problem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ein Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 well, that section certainly needs to be moderated a lot, but you're part of the problem Naysayer you be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rehab Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 this occasion provides enough context for an image post right Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rewjeo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 anyone with integrity is deserves a position of power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerine Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 this occasion provides enough context for an image post right Moved to FFTF so you could keep the thumbs up thumbin' up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Integrity is great, and from what I've seen on the drafting forum, he's obviously hugely important in rule compilation, if not formulation and standardization. Naturally I only said this to ingratiate myself as "one of the chums" before attempting to undermine this whole project. That being said, I think he can get a bit too riled up about things. I also remember that he made a topic once calling out members to stop making drafts because it was "bad for completions" as though that mattered for shit. A completion should really only matter to the person completing the run, and MAYBE to the people in the draft; if Integrity wasn't in the drafts, what business of his was it (and what business of mine is this topic?). It's fine if he criticizes people for not finishing drafts, and for making drafts with rules that are stupid, and possibly for cheating, or criticizing people who get too upset about cheating, or whatever. But I don't think any of these things are things which should be enforced by a section moderator. The creator of a draft topic, or the members participating in a draft, should be the one to enforce anything. If a creator, who lays out the rules, seems to be involved in cheating - specifically by breaking their own rules, maybe a pinned list of allegations/proofs (as in links to relevant rules and proof of violation, or summaries and links, not just summaries) could be kept so people can decide whether to shun a draft creator's threads. At best, warns should be given out if someone who is booted out of a draft or told to operate in a different manner clogs the topic with complaints or whatever. And has that really occurred often enough for a section mod to be necessary? Only one example has actually been given - presumably, people could 1: not give a shit or 2: ask any mod for intervention, not just a section mod. I grant I don't play drafts, and may be completely ignorant of circumstances that make Integrity a promising candidate. Anyway, being uninvolved, if the Hebrews wish a king, should I gainsay Saul; should I gainsay a heron, if the frogs wish a king? Edited June 13, 2012 by Hawkeye Hank Hatfield Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Hell, I'd be happy to see him be an administrator. Not so certain that HE would want that :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ein Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Hell, I'd be happy to see him be an administrator. Not so certain that HE would want that :p We should ask him first before we go around saying he'd be the best damn Admin ever even though that's impossible because Nightmare exists. I'd be a better Admin anyway. Haha. Tyranny..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.