SullyMcGully
-
Posts
486 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by SullyMcGully
-
-
3 minutes ago, Mitsuru Kirijo said:
I can't give a confident read on dunn because he's doing a tell he does as scum and a tell he does as town. (Seems I'll have to rethink those tells)
If I had a gun to my head I'd say town? Not my 'oh my god if you lynch him you're dumb' but town.
I don't want to lynch manga or Dunn todayOK well then whenever you get to my big quotewall with my Dunn read, I'll need you to tell me exactly what you think I'm wrong about if you're going to convince me not to lynch Dunn.
-
-
Claire, my sweet angel! My beloved muse! Oh, dear goddess that granteth the ability to tell night from day and scum from town, will you not bless me with your insight regarding your dear friend, here known as Ichigo, sometimes known as Dunn, who is most assuredly cute if only from having been in your presence, and fill my mind with understanding of how his current behavior stands in the light of his meta?
(Please give me your thoughts on Dunn, Claire.)
-
As for Bartozio vs. Claire, I feel like it's a distraction and Bartozio especially needs to become less focused on his own defense and more focused on reading others. Is Bart still scumreading Claire? I feel like it's time to let that whole thing go, they're still fighting over something that's ancient history now. There are better reads to pursue, and neither of them have substantial wagons, so they could use to be less defense-focused.
-
On reread, Weiner looks a bit wishy-washy. They haven't really committed to any of their reads. And they've pretty much ignored Dunn with like one exception. I feel like with the logic they've been using this game, they should be more interested in Dunn's slot.
-
As for Bartozio, I need some input. I'm noticing that he's been extremely rude and condescending this game, especially when he's defending himself. I know Bart as a friend and he isn't usually like this. So could those of you who've played with Bart more than I have tell me if he's normally this way and if it is at all alignment indicative?
-
Alright, time for another quote wall.
After reading the entire game again, I feel a little bit more knowledgeable about some things. I'm going to let Bart off the hook for now, though I do have some serious annoyances with their slot and questions about their meta because apparently I don't even know how one of my own best friends plays NOC. I'll address those things later though. For now I have a beef with Dunn.
On 12/29/2018 at 11:17 PM, Ichigo said:This train of thought is legit but I don't think it's scummy coming from Claire
Oh dang, I forgot what this post was in response to. I think it was Soup? Pretty sure it was Soup. Anyway, if Dunn were to flip scum then I'd look at Soup as a potential buddy.
On 12/29/2018 at 11:20 PM, Ichigo said:This player came into the thread with an agenda of going along with forming suspicion on Claire and extending it to another slot and trying to gain more echoing opinions
Strikes me as really scummy
BZZZ BZZZ that is the sound of a chainsaw starting. This post has been torn apart enough so far, but defending Claire and attacking Bartozio is definitely what Dunn came here to do. I really don't like Dunn's style, he posts like he expects a single sentence to carry all of the logic a normal player's paragraphs would. I understand that a lot of players (I suppose I myself am guilty of this) can be too wordy at times, but this is the opposite problem.
On 12/29/2018 at 11:22 PM, Ichigo said:Why does that make them town? When does town have strong conviction behind their posts when discussing multiple scumreads on page 3?
Seriously - how does "strong conviction behind their posts" make them more likely town? Can you explain this for me like I'm 5
This was an OK read when it came out and I agreed with it. However, Marth's posting has progressed. Dunn;s read on Marth needs to progress too. He can't just keep scumreading him based off of his first few posts.
On 12/30/2018 at 8:23 AM, Ichigo said:Your post has me feeling worse about Magnificence incarnate than Bartozio now
Saying I'm chainsawing someone is whatever, I was just giving my opinion on something I felt was wrong and then pointing out that someone else had an agenda
And you'll be able to see plenty of me, we've got plenty of time
This is where Dunn starts to sheep my Marth case. All I did was point out some discrepancies I noticed. I didn't say Marth was scum. I find it scummy when a player sheeps a read by radicalizing it beyond the original creator's intentions. It gives them a framework and some logic with which to hunt their prey. They merely provide the bite.
He also promises more content in the lat paragraph. I don't feel like we've seen satisfactory content yet, though.
On 12/30/2018 at 8:38 AM, Ichigo said:...Right, how does that make them town? Don't just explain what they're doing, explain why it's town.
Wanting to solve the game does not equal "and are more confident in what they're trying to do." - this isn't your first game of mafia, you've never seen a town player that was less than confident? You've never seen a scum player that carried themself with confidence? Where are you getting your information?
There are a lot of things wrong with this
First of all you say I fit the bill of someone making safe votes, yet I haven't voted anyone yet. This means that you probably didn't iso me, and just assumed that I must have voted somewhere.
Second of all, according to you, town should want to be more proactive in their approach and solve the game, so why didn't you iso me? I'll argue that failing to iso me and instead voting me based off of something I said is instead reactive play.
Third, there was no 'consensus narrative' on Bart when I was posting, both in terms of where I was replying to the thread and really in general
What Dunn is saying here is that since Marth isn't perfectly well-informed, he's scummy. Shouldn't scum be better informed than town? Dunn bases his case against Marth here on rather nit-picky grounds.
On 12/30/2018 at 8:40 AM, Ichigo said:No it wasn't
This is the kind of answer I hate from Dunn. Did he really expect Via to just take him at his word? It's a cheap answer which is perhaps too obvious for actual scum, but the way I see it, I'm almost inevitably going to end up voting for somebody who is doing a very bad job at not looking scummy.
On 12/30/2018 at 8:44 AM, Ichigo said:Funny (Do I need to mention this is sarcasm?), but the agenda would be to get other players scumread, to get the snowball rolling, I think you understand where I'm coming from so acting like you're oblivious is not helpful
I think he doesn't feel coasty
Explain why Weiner doesn't feel coasty. Don't just contradict everything Via says. If you have reasoning behind your opinions, share them. If you don't, then it's very likely that you're scum.
7 hours ago, Ichigo said:Your argument: "it was really towny"
My argument: "No it wasn't"
Not sure what else you want me to say, as you never explained anything yourself. It wasn't towny because It's something she does and would do as scum, because I've seen her play before
Yes, but could we get some details? And if you had even this much reasoning behind your original response to Via, why didn't you state it then? Why are you giving an almost deliberately small amount of information when Via obviously wants an in-depth explanation?
7 hours ago, Ichigo said:Less sure on Bart, not a townread for me though, I don't care about your stance, I agreed with the following regarding magnificance:
"This post feels off. The bolded part lumps together two players who I feel have been different this game and acts like they're both doing the same thing. And Bart's posts at this point had been very bare-bones, only providing original content when provided. Bart's play up to this point should look scummy in a lot of ways, and people who think Bart is town should be addressing how despite how it looks, it isn't really scummy, instead of pretending there's nothing suspicious there."
And Sully/RADicate are towny
I've disowned this case. I explained why above. Do you still think it has merit? If so, explain why?
7 hours ago, Ichigo said:Let me know when we start lynching people for reasons other than "they need to do more", I'll be on before deadline
Anti-town behavior...
1 hour ago, RADicate said:Hey sully! Ask me a question
RAD, did you know when you ask people to ask you questions instead of coming up with questions to ask them, it makes you look like scum? Could somebody who has played with RAD before let me know if he usually does this as town? I suppose RAD you can look at my Dunn case and give feedback.
-
Oh yeah, just real quick if you're wondering how I feel about Bart: probably just really cocky town early on, for which he is now paying the price. Not entirely OK with him but he doesn't have to be the lynch today. I'll take a look at Dunn later on. I also need to read RAD, Athena, and X(b)nad but I'm unfamiliar with their metas so I have a hard time there.
@Mitsuru Kirijo You know Dunn a lot better than any of us, what's your take on him? What is he usually like as scum?
-
OK I'm getting interrupted by work right now but here's what I've got so far:
On 12/29/2018 at 4:03 AM, Bartozio said:Fair enough.
I'd advice you to make sure your vote is either on who you suspect most or the person you're currently focussing on. That said:
##Unvote
##Vote: @Mitsuru Kirijo
Btw, thoughts on Weiner so far?
Notice the use of the word advice here. Bart giving Amy advice? It feels kinda tongue-in-cheek but it gives off a very cocky vibe. That cocky vibe defines Bart's early game. He's extremely confident.
On 12/29/2018 at 4:55 AM, Bartozio said:K, fair enough. I liked Weiner's play so far, and I think the only agenda he could have for not joining the Claire band wagon is that they're both scum, which is a scenario we might as well consider after lynching Claire.
So let's make Yolo-sempai proud and clap us some Claire I guess?
If by love you mean "I had a great rvs post all thought out, but then the game already got half serious before I arrived and now I don't wanna post it anymore. Oh god, am I getting lynched for going to bed before deadline again", then yes.
Also like... lol, it's rvs, what were you expecting other than easy accusations? It reminded me a bit of Honneybottoms (played by Walrein, which may or may not have been Amphy, I suck at name changes) in CupHeads mafia going an entire phase without moving off an rvs vote, even though they interjected relevant game thoughts (they were scum, and yes it's early D1, but it started similar). Currently, it being probably more personality than allignment driven and their opinions not being bad is giving me a slight townlean there though.
What are your thoughts on Amphy, Weiner and Claire?
He's thinking way too far ahead in the bolded section. Even if the paragraph afterwards is a joke, I find it hard to believe this one is. However, Bart is right. This jump here is so stupid. I'm not sure scum!Bart would be that dumb. But I don't see why town!Bart would do this either, and I think Claire is justified in being defensive in response to this. What Bart is suggesting here is getting an associative read by lynching a player off of an early post which they haven't even defended yet. It definitely sounds like he has an agenda.
On 12/29/2018 at 8:55 AM, Magnificence Incarnate said:Gonna town read the Dutch bros(bart and athena) for having opening posts that seem very gamesolvey. Their tone feels like they have a strong conviction behind their posts.
I thought amph's case on Claire was reasonable but Bart brings up a good point that she did the same thing in the last anon game that she played here as mafia and then suck with the rvs vote so I guess the Claire vote is not telling.
Kinda want a response from Claire before I put my thoughts down on her but I didn't like soup presenting a counterargument to amph without really taking reads in a different direction. This isn't much to go on but ##unvote ##vote: @weinerboy
I actually feel better about this post on reread. The first paragraph feels better to me because I feel like I can see now how Bart seemed to be so confident early on, and I don't have much of an issue with the second one anymore. Which means my case on Marth can probably be laid to rest. Which is what Dunn was leaning on for his case. I already have other issues with Dunn. Maybe when I finish reread I'll vote him.
Also I totally agree with Jester that Bart claiming he "grilled" Amy is a complete mischaracterization. They just had a passing conversation. Bart was a little condescending, but I don't feel like there was any friction there at all.
Will be back before deadline and finish reread.
-
6 hours ago, Shinori said:
You have to vote with the proper syntax.
The above is a quote from refa, not Via. This one line actually is what stood out to me the most. Kinda dislike this.
I may have to sub out but im trying to not do that.
I'm not a fan of this. In all honesty this is now how normal town act but it's how normal bartozio acts. Bart was scum in a recent game though I think and it might be worth the effort to compare some of his gameplay during this game to him during that game. We have less than 24 hours though to go looking through another game, and i don't even remember which game it was exactly...
I do agree that Bart's play so far has been scummy, I just heavily dislike the mentality that came from Sully's last post, specifically what I quoted as it makes bart look worse without factoring in meta.
I most likely missed it but @SullyMcGullyWhat are your thoughts on Claire V Bartozio that happened recently?
OK so I feel like the portion of my post that you quoted is being taken out of context. It was in response to Athena asking me to expand on how I felt like some defenses of Bart weren't townsided. So basically, that's not me saying Bart is scummy. I already said that in other posts. That was me commenting on other player's defenses of Bart. If you want to see me factoring in Bart's meta then look at my other content on him, where I'm actually trying to read him and not just mentioning my case on him in relation to something else.
Will get back to you on Claire vs. Bart after reread.
5 hours ago, Athena_57 said:Hard agree w/ Shinori that that is a terrible attitude to take wrt bart. Your viewpoint is more likely to come from a "treat everyone fairly/equally" than a "discern alignment"- mindset. Reads to me more like scum angry someone gets to be scummy than anything.
Why are you scumreading Marth again? Iirc it was bc you wanted his reads to be better, but I don't really see how he's been less productive than others like amy/shinori for example. What makes him worse?
I have repeated myself on this already. I'm not scumreading Marth. Marth is being Marth, which, as I remember it, generally means having really weak reads at the start of D1 which improve as time goes on. If they didn't improve, he'd be scummy. And it wasn't his production that bothered me, he lives on the other side of the world and I don't expect him to post frequently or anything. It was his actual content. It seemed illogical.
I'm going to reread most of the game and update my opinions.
-
I'm caught up on reading. I'm really exhausted tonight but just a few thoughts:
@Athena_57 when I said some defenses of Bart weren't very townsided I was referring mainly to Marth's which I felt like was sugarcoating Bart's scumminess. This logic of mine is getting a little dated at this point and I'll update it later, but here's what I mean:
Bart is definitely acting scummy.
Anybody who says Bart is town should be saying "I know he looks like scum, but he isn't really." They should not be giving him a pass or acting like this is a normal way for town to act. And IIRC that's what Marth did in his first post regarding Bart. It wasn't until later that Marth started to treat Bart like he actually needed defending.
@Bartozio I'm not saying you're an idiot, sorry if I sounded offensive, but I'm saying that it's not outside of the realm of possibility that you slipped up early on. And then backtracked afterwards when you realized it was a mistake. And the more you post, the more I can see this as being you as frantic town not wanting to be mislynched, but this is all dependent on your meta of being a frequent D1 mislynch. In a vacuum you look scummy. If another player were doing what you're doing they'd look scummy. And I don't feel entirely comfortable with it. I think it was Marth who said they expected you to be lazier as scum, but IMO how lazy/motivated scum is isn't necessarily as tied to an individual player's meta as it is tied to how they fit in/what is required of them by the rest of the scumteam.
My posts are starting to be less grounded in reality and more grounded in reality as I remember it. I'm too tired to be doing this right now. Sometime soon I'm going to do some rereading and get my reads straight. It's gonna be a while before I post again though. I'll probably be back in before DL but in case I'm not, I'm leaving my vote on Bart because he's the player I feel like is most likely to be scum. And if he isn't, at least it gives us a lot of info to work with regarding Claire, Dunn, Marth and some others.
I was actually considering making a case on Marth while I was gone today, but some things in his later posts have given me a better feeling about him. Like I said early on that I expected better from him and it feels like he's improved his reads a bit. There's probably more there if I read into it.
Also interesting fact: the entire game's focus is supposedly on Bart right now but I'm the only one voting him. Yet most of his recent content has been devoted to defending himself. Somebody who isn't sleep-deprived should take a look at that, it could be a townie going above and beyond to clear themselves or reactive scum.
Dunn has been really subpar TBH, but they've only posted minimally and the wagon on them popped up pretty suddenly. Not super comfortable lynching there.
I like Jester's content. If I may address some of the cases on Refa before Jester showed up, somebody called him "unmotivated" and I feel like that's wrong. What we saw in this game wasn't lazy Refa. Lazy Refa is very distinctive and annoying. Refa this game seemed pretty much in-line with their town meta and I know they've been busy with making an EiMM which could explain why their posting was infrequent. I seriously wouldn't have signed up for this while designing an EiMM so I can see why he subbed out.
@Fenrir Aesir I can talk about subouts right? The rules don't say anything about it, but I know that's a rule in some games.
@Jester's Gestures Via plays Mafia high. That's pretty much the only way they play, that's why they're pretty easy to read. Refer to their signature if you want.
Goodnight.
-
@Jester's Gestures do you know me? Should I know you? What site are you from? Is there another username you go under?
-
6 hours ago, Magnificence Incarnate said:
Hmm at this point since the narrative is a scum!Bart tunnel I'd expect scum to add fuel to the fire while maintaining a low presence/making safe votes. I'm confident in my town read on Bart for now so,
##unvote ##vote: @Ichigo
You fit the bill! Also you've got your evidence wrong,
No he didn't, he voted amph for what he perceived to be a shady vote on Claire and then sheeped amph's vote when he got her explanation. This sounds like an argument tailored to suit the consensus narrative on Bart, which is p scummy.
You've got your evidence wrong. Bart's vote on Any wasn't reasonable at all, it was pure RVS. Look at the timestamps if you have to. There wasn't any reasoning behind it, he was just joking.
4 hours ago, XnadrojX said:Why is via locktown?
Have you played with Via before?
3 hours ago, Vi-astra said:shinori is the biggest null in the game for me right now LMAO
##vote: XnadrojX
@SullyMcGully can you explain why you think this dude is town? cuz I'm not really seeing it ATM.
I read whole thread and I'm ready to go retreat into my cave now. until next time fellow water breathers
Because he started pushing a case without reading the entire thread. It's weak, but I feel like scum would have been better informed. That's all that really stood out to me on my first readthrough.
3 hours ago, XnadrojX said:What about Sully's scumread on you?
I thought I said this: I don't have a "scumread" on Marth. At least not yet. Marth is super annoying to read in these games even as town. Their latest posts aren't quite showing the logic and conviction I was hoping for.
Bart made a big post mostly addressed to me. I won't have time to address that for a while. I guess as my final thoughts for the next 12+ hours:
I think this kind of reactive behavior could easily be townie Bart, seeing his N1 mislynch looming again. But if he's scared of getting mislynched, then why is he so confident at first? And Bart's main argument right now is "do you really think I'm that stupid?" I mean, what if I do? What if you are that stupid?
I don't feel like the wagon on Bart is entirely scum-motivated, and I don't feel like the people who are scumreading Bart are tunneling him. People are keeping other reads open. A good many of you need to stop trying to make this out to be the entire game hating on a single poor player and accept that Bart's behavior has raised valid concerns that need addressing. It makes sense to be paranoid about mislynching Bart given his record but stop making it out to be some kind of scum agenda being the only reason he's under pressure.
Overall, I feel better about Bart but some things are still nagging me + some player's defenses of Bart have been very weak and lack town motivation.
I'll take a look at some other people whenever I get done with my other obligations today. I just wanted to reply to the stuff directed at me for now.
-
OK I'm finally in for the night. I did some reading! I actually feel like I might be not-useless this game.
20 hours ago, Ampharos said:why must you hurt me in this way
You may have the wrong impression of my read, so let me enunciate more clearly.
If Claire was legitimately looking to jumpstart the game out of RVS, to the point that she considered faking a scumread on someone, would she really be content to go afk and wait for other people to do the work for her?
There's a sense of impatience I'd be expecting to feel behind her posting if that was the case, and I'm not picking up any.
Ironically, Amy right here is doing the very thing Claire said she wouldn't do: "faking" a scumread. Basically, when Claire made her "fake scumread" post, that was the first post in the game that was even slightly serious. Amy took the golden opportunity to make bank off of that post, which is honestly something I had considered doing (that post came out right before I went to bed.) I don't think it was scummy for her to do so, and it started some good conversation. But I also don't feel like there's supposed to be any conviction behind Amy's posts. She's just starting the conversation, so when Bart comes in later with a serious scumread on Claire acting like he's just sheeping Amy, it feels off to me. Here's what I mean:
18 hours ago, Bartozio said:K, fair enough. I liked Weiner's play so far, and I think the only agenda he could have for not joining the Claire band wagon is that they're both scum, which is a scenario we might as well consider after lynching Claire.
So let's make Yolo-sempai proud and clap us some Claire I guess?
If by love you mean "I had a great rvs post all thought out, but then the game already got half serious before I arrived and now I don't wanna post it anymore. Oh god, am I getting lynched for going to bed before deadline again", then yes.
Also like... lol, it's rvs, what were you expecting other than easy accusations? It reminded me a bit of Honneybottoms (played by Walrein, which may or may not have been Amphy, I suck at name changes) in CupHeads mafia going an entire phase without moving off an rvs vote, even though they interjected relevant game thoughts (they were scum, and yes it's early D1, but it started similar). Currently, it being probably more personality than allignment driven and their opinions not being bad is giving me a slight townlean there though.
What are your thoughts on Amphy, Weiner and Claire?
The bolded is supposed to be a joke? That's what one of his later posts would suggest, but I feel like Bart is moving too fast to make Claire into a lynch target based off of marginal reads. Like I said, we're talking about the first game-related post in the game. It'll always get picked on. Bart is taking this too far. Especially considering that Claire hadn't replied to anything on her yet.
14 hours ago, Magnificence Incarnate said:Gonna town read the Dutch bros(bart and athena) for having opening posts that seem very gamesolvey. Their tone feels like they have a strong conviction behind their posts.
I thought amph's case on Claire was reasonable but Bart brings up a good point that she did the same thing in the last anon game that she played here as mafia and then suck with the rvs vote so I guess the Claire vote is not telling.
Kinda want a response from Claire before I put my thoughts down on her but I didn't like soup presenting a counterargument to amph without really taking reads in a different direction. This isn't much to go on but ##unvote ##vote: @weinerboy
This post feels off. The bolded part lumps together two players who I feel have been different this game and acts like they're both doing the same thing. And Bart's posts at this point had been very bare-bones, only providing original content when provided. Bart's play up to this point should look scummy in a lot of ways, and people who think Bart is town should be addressing how despite how it looks, it isn't really scummy, instead of pretending there's nothing suspicious there.
Also I'm OK with Soup, IMO they're just doing the same thing as Amy and starting the conversation. Like yeah it's a weak conversation, but it's better than no conversation. What's important here is saying "just because Soup participated in the early conversation (generally town behavior) doesn't mean he's town." Keeping an open mind is good. However, saying "Soup participated in this conversation, therefore he is scummy," is jumping the gun a bit.
Can't say for certain that I scumread Marth based off of this as I feel like they've been similar as town in the past, but I expect better reads from them.
13 hours ago, Mitsuru Kirijo said:Ew it's Rad. I guess it can be kinda seen as defensive. I kinda had a 'really?' moment with the whole first part but eh
This feels natural and helps put to rest some concerns of my own about Claire's reactive behavior in her first reply.
13 hours ago, RADicate said:also hi @SullyMcGully we are finally in a game together!
Yeah me too please be town buddy!
12 hours ago, Magnificence Incarnate said:@Shinori not sure what I need to expand upon. Wrt weiner it didn't feel like the convo went anywhere and he could've just not said anything and it would've had the same effect. There isn't much here but I feel like this is a better vote than anything else right now. And with amph well I think her case is reasonable I'm just not sold on it coming from town necessarily.
OK, well you vote people because they're scummy. Not because their behavior doesn't necessarily come from town. Marth feels really weak in these posts, I'll forgive him for now because there's not much content but he needs to get better or else.
4 hours ago, Bartozio said:Even jokes are made with some feeling behind them though? You're not a robot, so your head is never/very rarely going to be completely blank when posting something. Trying to get reads during rvs is basicly trying to read into those. Is that a reliable way to find scum on it's own? no. Does it lead to serious conversation sooner and is it thus better than doing nothing? yes.
The above is more a general statement than applying solely here (although it still aplies), but I feel people often forget/don't realize this when talking about reads during early game and it's starting to piss me off a bit.
Moving on.
Maybe I should explain some things here:
1. I liked Amphies case on you from the start, but the not voting thing was giving me nasty flashbacks. So I decided to grill her a little, and didn't want to muddy the water first.
2. I liked her response to said grilling enough to not have her as a slight scum lean, and I wasn't really finding Weiner sus, so at this point you were the obvious person to push for me (those two were the only people who had posted serious content at the moment, and I didn't see something else worth pushing other than you).
3. At that point, I could have made a post saying: "Gee, I don't really have anything else to push, so I guess I'll just sheep this slight scum lean because it's beats doing nothing", or I could think "I'm gonna vote here anyway, might as well dig in my heels and go balls deep because it's fun and more likely to get reactions. Besides people will realize I don't actually have someone who only made joke comments as lock scum, right?". I went with the later.
Technically correct, my favorite type of correct.These are still coming, right? Or are you still waiting for a different type of response?
Gonna refer to my response to Clair for the meat of this, but the short answer is: She's not actually lock scum. I wanted to make sure to keep things going.
About the exchange, part of it might have been that I did agree with her case but wanted to grill her first. Other than that, I can't really say much more than I'm a calculative person in general.
My read on Weiner went kind of like: Only agenda like thinking I can see from him here would be [AGENDA], but [AGENDA] implies Claire is scum, so there's no reason to go after Weiner before Claire.
Where [AGENDA] = Claire and Weiner are both scum and Weiner is trying to protect Claire.
Read my response to Claire for other stuff I guess.
This feels like a rollback. This is why I assume that bit about "clapping Claire" in that earlier post is a joke. His earlier posts have a lot of confidence, which is even why Marth townread him, but now he's saying "oh I wasn't confident really." And this is after he starts to get flak for his scummy behavior. And what Bart did to Amy's read on Claire isn't sheeping, it takes a simple read and treats it as if it could be a ride-or-die case. This just doesn't feel right.
27 minutes ago, Ichigo said:This player came into the thread with an agenda of going along with forming suspicion on Claire and extending it to another slot and trying to gain more echoing opinions
Strikes me as really scummy
Yeah this. Dunn's posts are a little barebones though and all he's done so far is chainsaw Claire (I think that's the right terminology? What I mean is, he's defending Claire and attacking her attackers.) Looking forward to seeing him interact more.
As for how I feel about Claire, I agree with Soup. Claire is really good at mafia, tonereading her is pointless, if we are to lynch her it will be on a later day with associatives to help us. All of the attention Claire has garnered so far is just what you get for making the first serious post in an NOC mafia game.
I'm scumreading Bart. He could fix this by posting some good responses to the points being laid against him, but right now everything he's done feels rather opportunistic. It's almost obviously so, which makes it seem too bold of a move for scum to make. But honestly my faith in Bart's scum ability isn't strong enough for me to think he's beyond drawing too much attention to himself as scum. We'll see how things develop. I'm putting my vote there.
##Vote: @BartozioAs for reads on other players, I feel like I need to go back and reread Shinori, RAD, and Athena. Especially Athena, there was something about his posts that felt off to me and I need to double-check and see if said suspicion actually exists. Refa could be town, could be scum, but at least he isn't being lazy! Amy and Soup both feel town based off of early interactions, but aren't confirmed yet. Something about Xnad's posts rubbed me as townie, looking forward to seeing more from him. Via is probably town based off of meta. I need to see more from Dunn. You guys know how I feel about Marth, Bart, and Claire, so I think that's everyone!
It's very late here, but I'll stay up for 30 more minutes in case any of you have anything to say regarding my wallpost. I'm going to be gone most of tomorrow unfortunately, so if you have anything else for me, let me know soon.
-
Hey I'm gonna be at a wedding all day. Talk to you all later.
-
-
Go ahead Claire. In fact, skip the whole game. I'll carry you.
-
There. Does this make it all better?
-
-
19 minutes ago, Magnificence Incarnate said:
Needs better boobs
That's no way to talk about a lady, boy.
##Vote: @Magnificence Incarnate -
1 hour ago, Mitsuru Kirijo said:
Cutie <3
Even cuter <3
-
I meant politically. I'm a patriot who loves America, but I disagree with... just about everybody with any sort of leadership position in the country.
-
Try not to sneeze...
-
...to put trash in their yard.
The proper way to throw your video game controller at a TV screen is...
Arctic Mafia (Game Thread)
in Mafia
Posted
It's D1. We'll be lucky if we find something particularly damning. I just want you to tell me if there's something you think I should know about Dunn that would change my read on him.