charlie_ Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 ##unvote ##vote: cam for threatening to vote me for something bbm did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT075 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 NO U THIS IS FAIR GAME FOR INSULTING MY SPEELING Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 IMO we should just do one lynch today and then see who gets killed at night, because it let's us know who the mafia think is town. Not a randlynch because that's lame, but we play this somewhat as we would play an NOC game, so we get interactions and all da good stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prims Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 I'm town Vanilla. Everybody claimtome. I counterclaim. I seriously think that until scumreads pop up we should start out by using our multiple lynches to just remove people with a meta of being a liability. Best case scenario we hit a scum, worst case they're town but we don't have to worry about misreading them and haven't actually wasted our day. ##Vote: MancerNecro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prims Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Alternately if somebody puts Cam at L-1 I'll hammer him. He's not really a good policy lynch though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prims Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 ftr I think the best way to play is to lynch 3 people today, policy or not. We rob scum of their nightkill either way; only problem is that if the game is 6:3 we lose. BUT if it's 6:3 we are also statistically likely to hit one scum in 3 lynches. So. Right now I mainly just want to hear what people think about turboing Mancer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prims Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 *if the game is 6:3 and we mislynch 3 times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prims Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 also i just wanted to mention that it's Dumb As H*ck that we have a group of ~4 or so players who claim to hate NOC and love OC but then we have OC sign-ups and none of them join it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_ Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 lolprims I could go along with Prims' idea, although I think 3 scum is unlikely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Let's see where this goes ##Vote: Prims Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 derp wrong person ##Unvote, ##Vote: Mancer I should stop thinking about other things while typing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_ Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 ##Unvote ##Vote: Mancer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Everybody should tell me what they think of turbolynching Mancer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MancerNecro Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 I actually wouldn't mind turbolynching myself, so turbolynch away, guys! ##Vote: MancerNecro Seriously speaking though, I think there have been a little way too many vote hops already, even for RVS. This is especially apparent for SB and to a smaller extent, Cam. People normal just stick to voting one player only in RVS and move out of it quickly as soon as a serious vote happens. All their vote hops make me think of opportunistic scum. ##Unvote: MancerNecro, ##Vote: Serious Bagels Prims also catches my attention for pseudo speculation of the number of scum available. He could be scum and thus have that information available. I want to see what he has to say about this. ##Poke: Priam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_ Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Why do people call out joke votehopping in again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_ Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Also Prims' numberspec makes sense since it's working out how many lynches we hqve before we lose majority. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 ##Unvote, ##Vote: SB This is unrelated from Mancer's point. I didn't like how you thought that turbolynching was a good idea but then didn't actually vote to lynch him until after I did. Seems like a way to push off the blame of a possible mislynch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MancerNecro Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 1361140960[/url]' post='2288791']Why do people call out joke votehopping in again? tbh, I think that once you have made a vote, joke or not, RVS or not, it should definitely count as a serious vote or be taken seriously by others in their examination of the facts. "joke" should never be an excuse for any votes made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MancerNecro Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 1361142258[/url]' post='2288815']tbh, I think that once you have made a vote, joke or not, RVS or not, it should definitely count as a serious vote or be taken seriously by others in their examination of the facts. "joke" should never be an excuse for any votes made. or for anything said about the game either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MancerNecro Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 eew, my iPad can't quote properly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_ Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 "no you're not allowed to have fun" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MancerNecro Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 1361143613[/url]' post='2288843']"no you're not allowed to have fun" Exactly! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBM Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 SB what do you have to say wrt what I said? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ema Skye Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 tbh, I think that once you have made a vote, joke or not, RVS or not, it should definitely count as a serious vote or be taken seriously by others in their examination of the facts. "joke" should never be an excuse for any votes made. Aren't RVS votes supposed to be non-serious? ##Unvote: Cam ##Vote: MancerNecro cause anyone who hates fun is obviously scum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_ Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 I actually missed what you said, oops. It was less about turbo lynching and more pushing a reaction, which I haven't liked too much. Something has to get us out of RVS. My vote stays for now: sleeping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.