Korath88 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) This is why I love this subforum. (Even if it's going way off topic) Spoiler This is probably my favourite subforum on SF, mostly due to the comparative lack of negativity. All the complaint threads on the SoV subforum are really starting to annoy me. I prefer pentagons Edited June 4, 2017 by Korath88 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaden Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Starting to get hungry now with all this pizza talk, but also mildly annoyed as I'm reminded of high level math and chemistry. 1 minute ago, GuiltyLove said: However, that Utada Hikaru song isn't called Complex and Clean! Yeah, but whoever said love with simple? It's always complex. :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcanite Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, GuiltyLove said: However, that Utada Hikaru song isn't called Complex and Clean! You just couldn't let it go eh? Well I guess that means she's a square then :/ Unfortunate, but it's the truth.... Oh well! 1 minute ago, Korath88 said: I prefer pentagons Leave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmokestack Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 17 minutes ago, SatsumaFSoysoy said: Real life is pretty boring. You must be a real killer at parties if the omniprescence of the square in real life doesn't rock you to your core. 11 minutes ago, DarkLordIvy said: Easy! Square shaped pizza is all well and good but once you get to those pieces in the middle it inevitably ends up a total mess! As a naturally messy eater myself squares are never the way to go for pizza. I find it much easier to just steal the whole box if I want more. Dig in, my friend, dig in. No one's going to judge. Said the clean eater to the messy one 6 minutes ago, GuiltyLove said: However, that Utada Hikaru song isn't called Complex and Clean! ^This. Clean is pretty simple, but something dirty can be that way for any number of reasons. 4 minutes ago, Korath88 said: This is why I love this subforum. Even if it's going way off topic. I prefer pentagons I know, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuiltyLove Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 why is no one talking about Jack Black and the octagon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatsumaFSoysoy Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, MrSmokestack said: You must be a real killer at parties if the omniprescence of the square in real life doesn't rock you to your core. The triangle is always the life of the party, man. Two triangles touch tips and the magic begins. Squares with their parallel lines just slide past each other, never connecting. It's sad, really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmokestack Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, SatsumaFSoysoy said: The triangle is always the life of the party, man. Two triangles touch tips and the magic begins. Squares with their parallel lines just slide past each other, never connecting. It's sad, really. Lewd implications aside, Two squares could just split into four triangles and make double the magic happen. We just went over this. And when they're done, they're back to being squares in the morning. Best of both worlds. Anyway, um, topic. Anyone think the effects of the weapon triangle in Heroes are exaggerated? It's essentially glorified RPS unless you're using a -Blade tome. Edited June 4, 2017 by MrSmokestack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatsumaFSoysoy Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, MrSmokestack said: Lewd implications aside, Two squares could just split into four triangles and make double the magic happen. We just went over this. And when they're done, they're back to being squares in the morning. Best of both worlds. But if a square has to become triangles to have fun, what's the point of being a square? So triangles are just better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuiltyLove Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 ANOTHER REASON WHY TRIANGLES ARE GOOD THE TRIANGLE ATTACK too bad it costs HP in SoV :( and isn't a guaranteed crit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmokestack Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, SatsumaFSoysoy said: But if a square has to become triangles to have fun, what's the point of being a square? So triangles are just better? Life can't be fun and games all the time Squares have the flexibility that triangles lack. Also, this: "Wouldn't going with the flow be bliss? But in time, what becomes of such a life?" --Klein Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaximillian Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, GuiltyLove said: too bad it costs HP in SoV :( and isn't a guaranteed crit Worst kind of a remake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korath88 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, GuiltyLove said: ANOTHER REASON WHY TRIANGLES ARE GOOD THE TRIANGLE ATTACK too bad it costs HP in SoV :( and isn't a guaranteed crit But the animation makes up for everything. And don't forget, there's also a reason why we have a weapon triangle and not a weapon square. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatsumaFSoysoy Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, GuiltyLove said: ANOTHER REASON WHY TRIANGLES ARE GOOD THE TRIANGLE ATTACK too bad it costs HP in SoV :( and isn't a guaranteed crit I was touched when I saw the animation it got in Echoes. 2 minutes ago, MrSmokestack said: Life can't be fun and games all the time Squares have the flexibility that triangles lack. Also, this: "Wouldn't going with the flow be bliss? But in time, what becomes of such a life?" --Klein Squares always have to have the same length on each side, no matter their size. Triangles come in all sorts of funky shapes, like right-angled, isosceles, irregular, etc. etc. They can adapt to any situation. Edited June 4, 2017 by SatsumaFSoysoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcanite Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, MrSmokestack said: Squares have the flexibility that triangles lack. Because triangles are too complex to conform to the filthy norms of society Triangle stick to their guns, while squares just stay dull and stupid, wasting what little uniqueness they may have, by keeping in line and being followers as oposed to leaders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmokestack Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Arcanite said: Because triangles are too complex to conform to the filthy norms of society Triangle stick to their guns, while squares just stay dull and stupid, wasting what little uniqueness they may have, by keeping in line and being followers as oposed to leaders. Special snowflakes? Leaders? Don't make me laugh It seems both sides value more the traits that their preferred shape embodies. Agreeing to disagree is perhaps the best recourse. pls stop derailing guys Edited June 4, 2017 by MrSmokestack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcanite Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, MrSmokestack said: It seems both sides value more the traits that their preferred shape embodies. Agreeing to disagree is perhaps the best recourse. I'm not agreeing to do anything until you acknowledge that squares are for squares Yeah let's do that. Enough derailing anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuiltyLove Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, MrSmokestack said: pls stop derailing guys WTA and WTD seem way too exaggerated in this game, but I guess it teaches us more about strategizing and computing numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SatsumaFSoysoy Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 I think the Triangle Attack should be in this game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaskedAmpharos Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 It's Spongebob Squarepants, not Spongebob Trianglepants. I rest my case. Spoiler I am also now convinced that every triangle sympathizer in this thread is with the illuminati. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSND Alter Dragon Boner Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 hour ago, MrSmokestack said: Lewd implications aside, Two squares could just split into four triangles and make double the magic happen. We just went over this. And when they're done, they're back to being squares in the morning. Best of both worlds. Anyway, um, topic. Anyone think the effects of the weapon triangle in Heroes are exaggerated? It's essentially glorified RPS unless you're using a -Blade tome. I still remember when someone said Weapon Triangle of FE heroes is actually much less impactful compared to standard Weapon triangle when your stats is low because affecting your attack by 4 isn't as ridiculous as when your stats is 50 and you get 10 attack swing That was actually so wrong its hilarious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcanite Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 56 minutes ago, SatsumaFSoysoy said: I think the Triangle Attack should be in this game. So are we looking for random things to break the game? Cause I have a few ideas too. What if Ragnarok had Fury 8? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaximillian Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Arcanite said: What if Ragnarok had Fury 8? What if Ragnarok dealt recoil damage before your unit acted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcanite Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, Vaximillian said: What if Ragnarok dealt recoil damage before your unit acted? What if Ragnarok made all out-of-combat damage fatal for attackers and defenders (Poison strike, savage blow Celica would be bonkers)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astellius Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 hour ago, SatsumaFSoysoy said: I think the Triangle Attack should be in this game. I agree! I was thinking the same thing. Est is going to be my next 5* promotion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rezzy Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 10 minutes ago, Arcanite said: So are we looking for random things to break the game? Needing 3 units to take down a single unit wouldn't exactly be game breaking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.