Esau of Isaac Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 I want to say too serious, but people say I should be less serious. Yeah Makaze lighten up man That's a polite way for them to tell you to eat a dick. :V Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) Yeah Makaze lighten up man That's a polite way for them to tell you to eat a dick. :V What?! My life has been a lie. Edited May 16, 2014 by Makaze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MercyWalk Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 People serious tend to get the job done well, so i'll go with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamanoir Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) I tend to be generally too laid back, and then decide to be too serious about an inconsequential matter. I tend to proscratinate far too much and at the end no one trust me for good reason. So... Yeah, being too serious is better. People may hate you, but at least you'll get the job done. That's the most important. Edited May 16, 2014 by shytende Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 i'd rather err on the side of not serious enough (says mr. stop having fun) since the question isn't 'take nothing seriously at all or take everything way too seriously' i think it's generally better to give everything an honest try but not to get too wrapped up in the details of the thing and just relax about it a little you'll live longer and, in my experience, probably do a better job of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Not serious. Though living as the LORD intended and taking the middle path, I've never had the reputation for either so I wouldn't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jiodi Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 I always took the not serious enough path, but realized it's probably better in the long run to be more serious than necessary. Just so you don't end up seeming unreliable to everyone around you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Specta Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) I think I'd rather be not serious. Obviously any extreme is a no-no, but as far as those two go I'd lean towards the too easygoing side of things. Edited May 16, 2014 by Specta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizenberg Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 not serious enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randoman Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Better to be too serious IMO, since you're less likely to offend people and the consequences of being too serious aren't as bad as the consequences of not being serious enough, to me. I already deal with the consequences of being too serious quite often, and I don't find it that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darros Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 I'd rather be not serious enough ((oop thats me IRL)) because you're not going to make any worthwhile friends if you have a reputation as being stuffy. I'd rather be known for being a fun guy than someone stuffy. But ultimately it's about a balance. That's whats important. But If I had to pick an extreme, not serious wins hands down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaMonkey Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 I'm always serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aleph Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 I am super cereal all the time and I can proudly exclaim that being completely srs is the right thing to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Alear Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) Not serious. Not serious at all. This is a very serious issue though. Edited May 16, 2014 by SeverIan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tryhard Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 I'm serious about not being serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knight Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 There are times to be serious, there are times to be silly, I wish to be recognized as the man who can determine these times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted May 17, 2014 Author Share Posted May 17, 2014 There are times to be serious, there are times to be silly, I wish to be recognized as the man who can determine these times. that's not really in the spirit of the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 I have the true answer to this question. Examples of non-serious people: i'd rather err on the side of not serious enough (says mr. stop having fun) Not serious. I think I'd rather be not serious. Not serious. Not serious at all. Examples of serious people: I'm always serious. I am super cereal all the time and I can proudly exclaim that being completely srs is the right thing to do Checkmate atheists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Specta Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 oh snap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrhesia Posted May 17, 2014 Author Share Posted May 17, 2014 Question 275. Would you rather live in the underground or in a city in the sky? like all my most SPECTAcular questions i cannot take credit for this (i wish i could) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 (edited) City in the sky! The view be wonderful and the thinner air would increase endurance. Edited May 17, 2014 by Makaze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Odinson Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 (edited) Oh man this is hard Pros (Air): The view is fucking great Pros (Underground): Probably cooler in the summer: see basements -- I fucking hate the heat Tornado-proof Cons (Air): Dead if I fall offEasy target for lightning Not Tornado-proof Cons (Underground): Damp as fuck Earthquakes The wifi is probably worse As a person who works primarily with electronics and tech, I think I may have to give up the spectacular view even if the wifi's gonna suck That is, unless there's also technology that just turns all the lightning that hits my house into electricity I can use later in which case hell yeah great view great wifi too Edited May 17, 2014 by Thor Odinson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmare Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 CITY IN THE SKYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY OH MAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaMonkey Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 (edited) Living in the sky sounds better to me than becoming mole people, so... On a related note, do we get loftwings? Edited May 17, 2014 by NinjaMonkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaze Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 Oh man this is hard Pros (Air): The view is fucking great Pros (Underground): Probably cooler in the summer: see basements -- I fucking hate the heat Tornado-proof Cons (Air): Dead if I fall off Easy target for lightning Not Tornado-proof Cons (Underground): Damp as fuck Earthquakes The wifi is probably worse As a person who works primarily with electronics and tech, I think I may have to give up the spectacular view even if the wifi's gonna suck That is, unless there's also technology that just turns all the lightning that hits my house into electricity I can use later in which case hell yeah great view great wifi too Wouldn't a city in the sky be the most technologically advanced place? How would it stay afloat otherwise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts