Peppy Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Dat Rules (borrowed/stolen from Integrity) - Ratings are assumed to be on Hard 1 Mode. - Votes need some explanation regarding their gameplay performance to be counted. If somebody else said what you want to already, quote them explicitly. +/- ≤1 point extra regarding personality/appearance is encouraged, but no more. If you exercise your bias privileges, please do so explicitly. Also, if your vote is already a 10/10 or greater than 9 and you give a full point of bias, The score may not exceed 10! - Numerical votes out of 10, or something proportional to it. Make it easy to calculate for my sake. - Every ranking phase ends from 2100 to 2200 EST. Every ranking phase starts from 2200 EST to 2300 EST. Do the math if you are in another timezone! - I will insist you do not use the "Not X" reason on any character, where X is another unit. If you do, your vote will be thrown out. - "Recruits X" or "takes you to X chapter" arguments are explicitly banned. C'mon, people, this shouldn't need to be a rule. That's not gameplay performance. - Assume that the character in question is being recruited. - Similar to the "Recruits X" rule, do not use "He Comes with a Free Ridersbane" as an argument. - Rate the character based on his/her performance without the Rainbow Potion, Maturity Drop or Bond Drop - I withhold the privilege to tell you your rating is bogus and demand you revise it if it breaks any of the above. I will not throw out votes anonymously, you will be informed and given a chance to revise. Averages: Yubello: 1.52 Bantu: 1.61 Norne: 2.28 Rickard: 2.72 Samto: 2.90 Wrys: 3.00 Bord: 3.25 Matthis: 3.60 Radd: 3.64 Horace: 3.78 Dice: 3.80 Cord: 3.83 Jeorge: 4.10 Maris: 4.25 Warren: 4.35 Ellerean: 4.81 Caesar: 4.87 Roger: 5.20 Castor: 5.62 Merric: 6.25 Linde: 6.27 Gordin: 6.33 Navarre: 6.50 Arran: 6.62 Frey: 6.87 Cain: 6.91 Cecil: 7.21 Minerva: 7.50 Ryan: 7.71 Wendell: 7.83 Barst: 7.87 Julian: 7.95 Draug: 8.14 : 8.15Yumina: 8.20 Etzel: 8.33 Rody: 8.43 Luke: 8.56 Marth: 8.70 Ogma: 9.00 Sirius: 9.31 Malliesia: 9.50 Feena: 9.53 Catria: 9.73 Palla: 9.86 My Unit: 9.99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ema Skye Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 His growths are incredibly high. It's too bad he's promoted with rather bad bases, but said growths will end those bases eventually. 5/10 - He's not really contributing beyond killing stuff, but he's not slowing you down either. Neutral utility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKL Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 (edited) Hes pretty good. Those bases stink but his weapon ranks are nice. He has 100 spd growth as a zerker/sniper and will normally proc 4 stats in arena levels with a good chance of 5. He comes early enough to be useful. He can snipe wyverns or go zerker for base arena (if you can spare the money) then reclass into another dracoknight. 6/10 Edited May 31, 2012 by PKL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclipse Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Another resource sink, but his Speed will always rock. Having natural axe/bow rank isn't a bad thing, with the flying enemies of doom coming up. 6/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShinRPGamer Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Hes pretty good. Those bases stink but his weapon ranks are nice. He has 100 spd growth as a zerker/sniper and will normally proc 4 stats in arena levels with a good chance of 5. He comes early enough to be useful. He can snipe wyverns or go zerker for base arena (if you can spare the money) then reclass into another dracoknight. 6/10 This, but score is 6.5/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedoom Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Another resource sink, but his Speed will always rock. Having natural axe/bow rank isn't a bad thing, with the flying enemies of doom coming up. 6/10 + bias= 7/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enex Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Hes pretty good. Those bases stink but his weapon ranks are nice. He has 100 spd growth as a zerker/sniper and will normally proc 4 stats in arena levels with a good chance of 5. He comes early enough to be useful. He can snipe wyverns or go zerker for base arena (if you can spare the money) then reclass into another dracoknight. 6/10 The same thing... Score: 6/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcus90 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 A rare case where growhts compensate for stinky bases. 6.6/10 Usable as a good filler unit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Barely see the hype in him to be honest. His biggest flaw is that he's strictly a promoted growth unit. Starting in Bows is okay, but enemies don't attack in 1-2 range like they did in Lunatic Mode. Axes aren't bad to specialize in, either, since it means going to Swordmaster isn't an issue. It just sucks that with 19 Spd he won't double Flying Dragons in Chapter 12. I think Sniper even fails to double the Bandits, too. I guess he has potential to grow, but in a game where Warpskipping could happen pretty soon, I barely see his potential. Ignoring Warpskip, he might turn out fine and dandy. He just needs some attention that's kind of comparable to Roger and co. 5/10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dondon151 Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Hes pretty good. Those bases stink but his weapon ranks are nice. He has 100 spd growth as a zerker/sniper and will normally proc 4 stats in arena levels with a good chance of 5. He comes early enough to be useful. He can snipe wyverns or go zerker for base arena (if you can spare the money) then reclass into another dracoknight. 6/10 ok wait, how does this make sense if wendell sucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 ok wait, how does this make sense if wendell sucks It's simple dondon Wendell has no growths ololololololololol. He gave Etzel an 8/10 too, which I secretly found fucking hilarious when he mentioned that Excalibur is useless with Wendell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKL Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 (edited) I dont think I ever said wendell sucks. People were overrating him too much. I would understand the ratings he was being given if it were FE11. In 12? not so much unless its H3. Not giving him a 9/10 like others were =/= saying he sucks. Edited May 31, 2012 by PKL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 7-8/10 is considered overrated for Wendell? Are you fucking kidding me right meow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKL Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 (edited) There were 9/10s. Quite a few actually. And yes, i find that overrating him. He sure is good, but not 9/10 worthy to me. And i probably should not have rated etzel. Ive never actually used him...i just went with what I had heard. Edited May 31, 2012 by PKL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 (edited) There were 9/10s. Quite a few actually. And yes, i find that overrating him. He sure is good, but not 9/10 worthy to me. I count 2. And it was through fucking bias. Lumi and me gave him a 9/10. You also had Wen. who was a complete retard and gave him 2/10. Edited May 31, 2012 by Colonel M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKL Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 U mad brah? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 U mad brah? Well no, since I merely tossed the vote like it was made by someone that was born with Purple Knight's brain. So no. I'm not really mad at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKL Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Ok. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colonel M Posted May 31, 2012 Share Posted May 31, 2012 Ok. But next time learn to count. 2 votes isn't significant for a 9/10, with bias. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.